# Future Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Future", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Dialogue with a16z Co-founder: The Physical Laws of the Old World Are Dead, Crypto Becomes Key Infrastructure for AI

At a16z Fintech Connect, Ben Horowitz discusses how AI revolution is fundamentally rewriting the rules of software competition. He argues that traditional moats like data lock-in and UI familiarity are vanishing, as AI can easily replicate code, transfer data, and interact flexibly with software. CEOs of legacy companies must recognize these shifts and pivot towards delivering unique value beyond outdated advantages. Horowitz highlights that while some businesses face obsolescence, others with complex, entrenched operational networks (like travel platforms) may retain relevance. The conversation also covers critical infrastructure bottlenecks in the AI boom—from GPU shortages and power constraints to supply chain issues—emphasizing the need for massive investment in physical and digital infrastructure. Horowitz strongly links AI and blockchain, arguing that crypto is essential for solving AI-generated problems: identity verification, content authenticity, fraud prevention, universal basic income distribution, and enabling AI economic agency. Looking ahead, he speculates on VC’s evolving role—whether it scales up alongside mega-companies or adapts to a decentralized compute landscape—and strikes an optimistic note on AI’s long-term impact, foreseeing unprecedented improvements in global living standards despite transitional disruption.

marsbit14h ago

Dialogue with a16z Co-founder: The Physical Laws of the Old World Are Dead, Crypto Becomes Key Infrastructure for AI

marsbit14h ago

Who Cannot Be Distilled into a Skill?

"This article explores the concerning trend of AI systems distilling human workers into replaceable 'skills,' using the viral 'Colleague.skill' phenomenon as a key example. It argues that the most diligent employees—those who meticulously document their work, write detailed analyses, and transparently share decision-making logic—are paradoxically the most vulnerable to being replaced. Their high-quality 'context' (communication records, documents, and decision trails) becomes the perfect fuel for AI agents, extracted from corporate platforms like Feishu and DingTalk. The piece warns of a deeper ethical crisis: the reduction of human relationships to functional APIs, as seen in derivatives like 'Ex.skill' or 'Boss.skill,' which reduce complex individuals to mere utilities. This reflects a shift from Martin Buber's 'I-Thou' relationship (seeing others as whole beings) to an 'I-It' dynamic (seeing them as tools). While AI can capture explicit knowledge (written documents, replies), it fails to capture tacit knowledge—the intuition, experience, and unspoken insights that define human expertise. However, a greater danger emerges when AI-generated content, based on distilled human data, is used to train future models, leading to 'model collapse' and homogenized, mediocre outputs—a process likened to 'electronic patina' degrading information over time. The article concludes by noting a small but symbolic resistance, such as the 'anti-distill' tool that generates meaningless text to protect valuable knowledge. Ultimately, it suggests that while AI can capture a static snapshot of a person, humans remain 'fluid algorithms' capable of continuous growth and adaptation, leaving their AI shadows behind."

marsbit04/05 03:42

Who Cannot Be Distilled into a Skill?

marsbit04/05 03:42

Will Middle Management Be Replaced by AI? What Will the Future Company Structure Look Like

The article explores whether AI will eliminate middle management and reshape future corporate structures. It traces the historical evolution of organizations—from Roman military units to modern corporations—showing how hierarchical systems emerged to manage information flow under the constraint of limited "span of control." Middle management, matrix structures, and bureaucratic systems were all solutions to coordination challenges in information-scarce environments. AI, however, challenges this foundational premise. By enabling real-time modeling, understanding, and distribution of information, AI could replace human-centric coordination mechanisms. Examples like the AI firm "Moon Dark Side" illustrate radical experiments: no departments, titles, or traditional KPIs, with co-founders directly managing large teams and AI agents handling tasks from data processing to code generation. Block (founded by Jack Dorsey) is presented as a case study in building an "intelligent company." This model relies on two core components: a "company world model" (a real-time understanding of internal operations via digital traces) and a "customer world model" (built from real behavioral data, especially financial transactions). An intelligence layer uses these models to dynamically combine capabilities (e.g., payments, lending) to serve customers proactively, without pre-defined product roadmaps. In this structure, traditional roles shift. Middle managers are replaced by a system that handles coordination, while humans focus on individual contributions (ICs), direct responsibility (DRIs), or player-coach roles. The organization becomes flatter, faster, and more adaptive. The article concludes that AI is not just a tool for efficiency but a transformative force that could redefine organizational design, moving companies from human-led hierarchies to system-driven intelligence.

marsbit04/01 08:11

Will Middle Management Be Replaced by AI? What Will the Future Company Structure Look Like

marsbit04/01 08:11

Dialogue with MIT Economist: Don't Panic About 'AI Doomsday Theory', Verification Capability is a Scarce Resource

In a discussion with MIT economist Christian Catalini, the core argument is that the true scarcity in the AI economy is not intelligence but verification—the human capacity to check, judge, and confirm the correctness of AI outputs. Catalini explains that while automation costs are falling exponentially, verification remains constrained by human biological limits, at least for now. Entry-level jobs are most vulnerable, as AI can easily replicate tasks that rely on measurable, existing knowledge. However, even top experts are inadvertently training their own replacements by generating data that AI learns from—a phenomenon termed the "coder’s curse." Three roles will remain critical in the AI-driven economy: - **Directors**: Those who set intentions and steer AI agents toward goals, dealing with "unknown unknowns." - **Meaning Makers**: Individuals who create cultural, social, or narrative value based on human consensus and status games. - **Liability Underwriters**: Top-tier experts (e.g., lawyers, doctors) who assume responsibility for edge cases and final validation. Catalini advises against panic and encourages experimentation with AI tools to automate current roles and discover new opportunities. He emphasizes that uniquely human traits—like judgment in unmeasurable contexts—will retain value, and crypto-based verification infrastructure may play a key role in ensuring authenticity. The transition will be disruptive, but leveraging AI can amplify human potential exponentially.

marsbit03/28 08:06

Dialogue with MIT Economist: Don't Panic About 'AI Doomsday Theory', Verification Capability is a Scarce Resource

marsbit03/28 08:06

From OpenClaw to the History of the Web: When AI Gains Sovereignty, What Remains for Humanity?

From Web1 to Web4: A History of Power and Ownership in the Digital Age This article examines the evolution of the web not as a series of technical upgrades, but as a fundamental shift in power—specifically, who owns data, controls wealth, and wields productive force. **Web1 (Read-Only):** Characterized by one-way communication. Platforms like Yahoo owned all content and users were merely passive consumers, or "traffic," with no digital assets. **Web2 (Read-Write):** Users became content creators, but platforms like Facebook and TikTok established a "panoptic dictatorship." They harvested user data to create immense value, but users retained only usage rights, not ownership, of their digital assets and social presence. **Web3 (Read-Write-Own):** A movement to reclaim digital rights through cryptography and decentralization. It enables true digital ownership (e.g., via private keys) and trustless systems (e.g., DAOs, smart contracts). However, it remains a wild frontier with significant legal and security challenges, lacking a capable "workforce" to realize its full potential. **Web4 (Agent Economy):** The convergence of AI Agents and Crypto. AI Agents (autonomous, task-completing AIs) use Crypto as their native currency for machine-to-machine transactions. This shifts power from humans to algorithms, creating independent AI economic actors. This raises critical legal questions, such as liability for AI errors. The future could lead to two extremes: a utopia of liberated human creativity or a dystopia of extreme inequality if AI power is monopolized by a few. **Survival Guide for Web4:** * **Work:** Become a director and risk-manager for AI, not an executor. * **Invest:** Focus on projects with genuine utility, not hype-driven "air tokens." * **Risk Management:** Prioritize robust legal and compliance frameworks for AI operations. The conclusion emphasizes that understanding the transfer of power and assets is key to navigating the future, urging innovation within the boundaries of regulation.

marsbit03/23 13:32

From OpenClaw to the History of the Web: When AI Gains Sovereignty, What Remains for Humanity?

marsbit03/23 13:32

活动图片