# Depeg Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Depeg", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Lightning Fast Five-Whip Combo! Strategy's Self-Rescue Plan Officially Released

Strategy, amidst the STRC de-pegging crisis, has unveiled its "Digital Credit Capital Framework" self-rescue plan. The five-part framework includes: 1) **Cash Reserves**: Management of ~$2.55B in USD reserves, dedicated solely to covering ~17.4 months of preferred stock dividends and debt interest, with a 12-month minimum coverage floor. 2) **Dividend Policy**: STRC's dividend yield rises to 12% from July 1st, with monthly reviews. Strategy clarifies de-pegging does not automatically trigger further hikes. 3) **Preferred Stock Buyback**: A $1B authorization, prioritizing STRC repurchases to support its price, reduce future dividend obligations, and signal commitment, using funds separate from dividend reserves. 4) **Common Stock Buyback**: A separate $1B authorization for MSTR stock, aimed at creating shareholder value when the stock is deemed undervalued, establishing a two-way capital management mechanism. 5) **Bitcoin Monetization**: Formal authorization to sell BTC (up to $1.25B earmarked) to build USD reserves, cover dividends/interest, or fund buybacks, marking a strategic shift where BTC becomes a managed asset rather than a strictly "hold-only" reserve. Market reaction saw MSTR and STRC shares rise pre-market, while BTC remained stable. The plan aims to restore confidence in STRC, ensure dividend sustainability, and reopen Strategy's funding channels.

Odaily星球日报06/29 13:18

Lightning Fast Five-Whip Combo! Strategy's Self-Rescue Plan Officially Released

Odaily星球日报06/29 13:18

Spicy Review|Is the "Most Emotionally Valuable" Post Here? Could STRC Be the Next LUNA?

Here is an English summary of the article (under 1500 characters): This article from the spicy commentary series "LaPing" covers three key stories in the crypto world for the week. First, during a sharp market downturn in June where BTC fell over 20%, a Reddit post on r/Cryptocurrency rallying against "Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)" went viral. The comment section became a hub for retail traders to share memes and encouragement, with many advocating holding (HODLing) through the volatility, embodying the "be fearful when others are greedy" mantra. Second, it examines the situation with STRG (Strategy's perpetual preferred stock), which has "de-pegged," trading around $76 vs. its $100 face value, a ~25% discount. The concern is whether Michael Saylor's company, MicroStrategy, can sustain the $1.2 billion annual dividend payment, given its ~$1.4 billion cash reserve. While analysts note STRG is fundamentally different from the catastrophic LUNA collapse—as Saylor isn't obligated to pay the dividend—risks remain. If MicroStrategy's (MSTR) common stock investors feel their capital is being prioritized for STRG dividends, it could hurt MSTR demand. Third, the article analyzes the online persona of "Chuan Mu," a trader famous for turning $500 into $1 million during the 2023 ORDI inscription boom and again with short positions in 2025. An analysis of his 1,828 tweets reveals his success stems from a top-down analytical framework, asking systemic questions like "Where will the bottleneck be in the AI supply chain?" rather than chasing individual pumps. His investments migrated from crypto-linked stocks to AI infrastructure plays like SK Hynix and Samsung. However, the piece also notes criticism that he has occasionally "pumped" assets and sold positions without notifying followers, creating a contradictory public image. The weekly recap highlights themes of community sentiment during bear markets, financial instrument risks, and the complex realities of following influential online traders.

Foresight News06/26 10:38

Spicy Review|Is the "Most Emotionally Valuable" Post Here? Could STRC Be the Next LUNA?

Foresight News06/26 10:38

STRC Breaks Below $95: Why Does It Continue to Depeg? Is There Default Risk?

"STRC Falls Below $95: Why the Persistent Depegging and Is There Default Risk?" The article discusses the recent decline in the price of STRC, a perpetual preferred stock issued by Strategy (MSTR) designed to trade around a $100 par value. As of publication, STRC traded at $94.65, raising market concerns. STRC is described as a high-yield cash flow product, offering an 11.50% annual dividend paid monthly. Its "preferred" status grants it priority over common stock for dividends and in liquidation. Key reasons cited for the price depegging include: 1. **Bitcoin's Price Drop:** MSTR's assets are heavily tied to Bitcoin (BTC), which fell over 21% from its recent high, pressuring all Strategy-related products. 2. **Competitive Pressure:** Rival Strive Asset Management's similar product, SATA, offers daily dividends and has maintained its $100 par value with a ~13% yield. In response, Strategy has proposed changing STRC's dividend frequency from monthly to bi-weekly, pending shareholder vote. 3. **Technical Selling:** A break below $100 may have triggered algorithmic selling and stop-losses, exacerbating the decline. Regarding default risk, the analysis suggests it is currently low. Strategy founder Michael Saylor confirmed the June 2026 dividend rate remains at 11.50% with no cuts or suspensions. The company's massive reserve of 843,706 BTC provides a significant backstop for its obligations. Industry opinions are mixed. Some analysts view the BTC holdings as reliable support for dividends, while critics like Peter Schiff warn of potential dividend cuts leading to price crashes and lawsuits. Others highlight inflation risk and the company's ability to reduce dividends without a formal default. In summary, STRC's drop is attributed to BTC volatility, competition, and technical factors. While immediate default risk appears contained, the product faces challenges from market conditions and competitive dynamics.

marsbit06/04 08:13

STRC Breaks Below $95: Why Does It Continue to Depeg? Is There Default Risk?

marsbit06/04 08:13

Old Case Resurfaces: The 1011 Crash Sparks a Mixed Battle of Public Opinion Between Exchanges and Ecosystems

"Old Case Resurfaces: The 1011 Crash Sparks a Public Opinion Battle Between Exchanges and Ecosystems" Over the weekend, a wave of criticism targeting Binance reignited on X (formerly Twitter), centered on revisiting the "1011 Event" from October 11, 2023. The controversy was sparked by ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood, who suggested in an interview that the crypto market's recent stagnation was an aftershock of a $28 billion leverage liquidation event caused by a system glitch on Binance. The 1011 Event was a major market crash where the global crypto market lost over $500 billion in value, with leverage liquidations surpassing $19 billion. Critics point to a liquidity anomaly on Binance during the crash, which triggered its Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism and caused massive, cascading liquidations. The exchange's high-yield USDe promotion was also cited as a contributing risk factor. Binance later paid approximately $283 million in compensation to affected users but maintained the sell-off was driven by broader market conditions. The criticism has evolved into a broader industry debate. A key figure in the accusatory camp is Leonidas, a founder in the Bitcoin Ordinals ecosystem, who has long criticized Binance's listing practices, alleging the exchange demands high token allocation fees from projects. More significantly, OKX founder Star (Xu Mingxing) entered the fray, arguing the 1011 crash fundamentally altered the market's microstructure. He claimed Binance's USDe promotion, which offered 12% APY and was treated as collateral, introduced massive systemic risk akin to a "tokenized hedge fund," not a stablecoin. The conflict also revealed underlying public chain competition. CZ unfollowed Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko (Toly) after he shared Xu's critical post, hinting at the rivalry between Binance's BSC chain and Solana for meme coin liquidity. In Binance's defense, some analysts offered more neutral perspectives. Trader Benson and Dragonfly's Haseeb Qureshi argued that while Binance had some responsibility, the "USDe caused the crash" narrative doesn't align with the timeline, as the market bottomed before USDe depegged on Binance. They suggested a confluence of factors—including Trump's tariff comments, API issues preventing market makers from hedging, and a lack of circuit breakers—led to the crash. Amid the FUD, Binance announced it would convert the assets in its $1 billion SAFU insurance fund from stablecoins to Bitcoin. The article concludes that the intense scrutiny on Binance stems from its dominant size, meaning any structural industry problem will manifest there first. The core of the debate is not just assigning blame for one event, but whether the leading exchange will assume a higher responsibility for market stability.

marsbit02/02 03:20

Old Case Resurfaces: The 1011 Crash Sparks a Mixed Battle of Public Opinion Between Exchanges and Ecosystems

marsbit02/02 03:20

活动图片