Strategy CEO says, ‘STRC is our iPhone moment’ after $5B revenue in 7 months

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-08Last updated on 2026-04-08

Abstract

Strategy CEO Phong Le has described the company’s Stretch (STRC) preferred stock product as its “iPhone moment,” following $5 billion in cumulative revenue generated within just seven months of its launch. STRC, a monthly variable yield-paying product, currently offers an 11.5% yield and is the firm’s fastest-growing offering, second only to BlackRock’s IBIT in terms of growth speed. Retail investors dominate STRC ownership at 80%, attracted by its relatively low volatility and steady returns, while the more volatile common stock MSTR is primarily held by institutional investors. A significant portion of STRC proceeds is used to purchase Bitcoin, with nearly 70% of a recent 4,800 BTC acquisition funded through the product. Year-to-date, Strategy has acquired 94,000 BTC, more than double the amount of Bitcoin mined during the same period.

Strategy has accelerated its Bitcoin buys in the past few months, thanks to its highly sought-after preferred stock, Stretch [STRC]. In a recent interview, Strategy CEO Phong Le billed the viral STRC product as the treasury firm’s ‘iPhone moment.’

$STRC is our iPhone moment. $5B in cumulative revenue in 7 months, faster than virtually any product, including the iPhone.

For the uninitiated, Strategy has four types of preferred stocks in its lineup alongside the main common stock, MSTR. All of these are part of its capital structure, aimed at raising funds for its BTC buys.

So far, STRC, a monthly variable yield-paying product, has been most successful. It currently offers an 11.5% yield. As stated by Le, the product debuted last July and has crossed $5B in proceeds.

For Le, Stretch is the ‘fastest growing product’ and only second to BlackRock’s IBIT.

It took Apple iPhone two years to get to $5B in cumulative revenue. Google Ads took 4 years. The gold ETF took 5 years to get $5B in net assets. But it took two months for BlackRock’s IBIT to hit $5B. So, the only product that has grown faster than Stretch is IBIT.

Why 80% retail dominates STRC

On the massive 80% market share of retail in STRC, Le explained that this stock is less volatile compared to MSTR. As such, retail is comfortable with the 10%-12% monthly return with low volatility that STRC offers.

In contrast, MSTR can be 2x more volatile than BTC. Only institutional investors can stomach the wild swings, plus the potential for higher risk-adjusted returns for long-term holding, Phong Le noted. In fact, MSTR ownership is dominated by institutional investors at 60%.

Put differently, the products serve different markets with divergent risk tolerance, and Strategy has been able to capitalize on both sides.

Source: Bitcoin Treasuries

That said, most of the proceeds from STRC sales end up buying BTC. On Tuesday, the 7th of April, STRC helped fund 936 BTC from a $64.3 million sale.

Separately, Strategy announced a 4.8K BTC purchase, bringing its overall holdings to 766,970 BTC. STRC funded nearly 70% of this latest buy. On a year-to-date (YTD) basis, Strategy has acquired 94K BTC, or 2.2x mined BTC.

Source: Strategy

Meanwhile, MSTR was up 5.6% and traded at $130 after Tuesday’s market hours. This followed BTC’s 6% surge to over $72K after the U.S.-Iran ceasefire deal.


Final Summary

  • Strategy CEO hails STRC as its fastest-growing product, calling it their ‘iPhone moment’ after record $5B proceeds in 7 months.
  • According to Phong Le, STRC is 80% dominated by retail because it is less volatile with a moderate monthly yield of over 10%.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat did Strategy CEO Phong Le call the STRC product, and why?

APhong Le called STRC the company's 'iPhone moment' because it generated $5 billion in cumulative revenue in just 7 months, a growth rate faster than virtually any other product, including the iPhone.

QHow does the risk profile and investor base of STRC differ from that of MSTR?

ASTRC is less volatile and offers a stable 10-12% monthly yield, making it predominantly to retail investors (80%). In contrast, MSTR is twice as volatile as Bitcoin and is primarily held by institutional investors (60%) who can tolerate its higher risk for potential long-term returns.

QWhat was the primary use of the proceeds from the sales of the STRC preferred stock?

AThe primary use of the proceeds from STRC sales was to purchase Bitcoin. For example, a recent $64.3 million sale funded the purchase of 936 BTC, and STRC funded nearly 70% of the firm's latest 4,800 BTC acquisition.

QHow does the growth of STRC's revenue compare to other major products like the iPhone and BlackRock's IBIT?

ASTRC reached $5 billion in cumulative revenue in 7 months. This was faster than the iPhone, which took 2 years, Google Ads (4 years), and a gold ETF (5 years). The only product that grew faster was BlackRock's IBIT, which hit the same milestone in just 2 months.

QWhat was the impact of the U.S.-Iran ceasefire deal on MSTR's stock price and Bitcoin?

AFollowing the U.S.-Iran ceasefire deal, Bitcoin's price surged by 6% to over $72,000. This positive movement in BTC subsequently led to a 5.6% increase in the price of MSTR, which traded at $130 after Tuesday's market hours.

Related Reads

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News2m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News2m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit19m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit19m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手31m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手31m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit46m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit46m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

956 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片