Stablecoin payments below $200 can go tax-free: If Congress agrees

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-21Last updated on 2025-12-21

Abstract

In a renewed bipartisan effort, U.S. lawmakers Max Miller and Steven Horsford have proposed a tax exemption for stablecoin transactions valued at $200 or below, aiming to provide clarity and consumer protection. This follows a previous failed attempt by Senator Cynthia Lummis in 2025 to introduce a similar exemption. Currently, the IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, subjecting it to capital gains tax. Meanwhile, banking lobbyists oppose the high yields offered by crypto exchanges on stablecoin deposits, arguing it threatens traditional banks. Industry leaders, including Gemini's co-founder, are defending the GENIUS Act against what they call anti-competitive overreach by banks. The outcome of both the tax proposal and the stablecoin yield debate remains uncertain.

The U.S. Congress is making another attempt at tax relief for low stablecoin transfers and crypto staking.

In a recent House proposal, lawmakers Max Miller (Ohio) and Steven Horsford (Nevada) sought tax exemptions for stablecoins valued at $200 or below.

Part of the draft read,

“The provision is intended to establish a per-transaction de minimis threshold of $200, consistent with the foreign currency transaction exception under section 988.”

In a statement, Rep. Miller said that the legislation was a “bipartisan effort” to ensure consumer protection.

“This bill would protect consumers making everyday purchases, ensure the rules are clear for innovators and investors, and strengthen compliance so everyone plays by the same rules.”

However, this was not the first time Congress had tried to push for U.S. crypto tax clarity.

Senator Lummis’ failed crypto tax plan

In July 2025, pro-Bitcoin Senator Cynthia Lummis floated a similar tax proposal that included a $300 exemption for small transactions.

She also advocated for tax deferral for staking and mining rewards during the amendment process of President Donald Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. The exemption was to have an annual cap of $5,000 on crypto gains to avoid abuse.

However, the provisions didn’t make it to the final version of the bill after failing to reach the voting threshold. Some Democrats also opposed the proposal, arguing that it would result in a loss of government revenue.

Currently, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) treats cryptocurrency as property, which can attract capital gains tax rates ranging from 10% to 37%.

For long-term investors, the tax rates are relatively favorable, ranging from 0% to 20%.

It remains to be seen whether the latest tax proposals will be included in the crypto market structure bill.

Stablecoin yield fight

Even so, the stablecoin yield paid out by crypto exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase, among others, continues to be opposed by the banking lobby.

According to them, it threatens community banks. They argued that deposit capital will shift to stablecoins in search of the 3%-4% rewards, rather than banks’ less than 1% yield on average checking accounts.

However, Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss and other industry players are also pushing back against the banksters’ anti-competitive ‘overreach.’

Reacting to a collective industry letter to Congress to defend the stablecoin law GENIUS Act, Winklevoss stated,

“We are not going to let them (banks) get away with this. That’s why we signed onto this letter with 125+ other companies to defend the GENIUS Act as it is written.”


Final Thoughts

  • Congress has revived the crypto tax exemptions for low stablecoin transfers.
  • However, the fight against stablecoin rewards issued by exchanges continues.

Related Questions

QWhat is the proposed de minimis threshold for tax exemptions on stablecoin transfers in the recent House proposal?

AThe proposed de minimis threshold is $200 or below for stablecoin transfers.

QWhich two lawmakers are behind the recent proposal for tax exemptions on small stablecoin transactions?

AThe lawmakers are Max Miller from Ohio and Steven Horsford from Nevada.

QWhat was the outcome of Senator Cynthia Lummis's similar crypto tax proposal in July 2025?

ASenator Lummis's proposal, which included a $300 exemption for small transactions and tax deferral for staking and mining rewards, failed to reach the voting threshold and was not included in the final version of the bill.

QWhy are banking lobbies opposing the stablecoin yields offered by exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase?

ABanking lobbies argue that stablecoin yields threaten community banks because deposit capital may shift to stablecoins seeking 3%-4% rewards, compared to banks' average checking account yields of less than 1%.

QHow does the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) currently treat cryptocurrency for tax purposes?

AThe IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, which can attract capital gains tax rates ranging from 10% to 37% for short-term gains and 0% to 20% for long-term gains.

Related Reads

NVIDIA Begins Adding Soap to the Bubble

NVIDIA is taking on a dual role: not just as a leading chip supplier, but as a massive capital allocator across the entire AI supply chain. In 2026, the company has committed over $40 billion in investments within five months, targeting everything from optical fiber manufacturing and data center operations to foundational AI model development. This investment spree, described as a systematic "sprinkler" approach, primarily funds companies that are major buyers of NVIDIA's own GPUs. Critics, including analysts from Goldman Sachs, label this a "circular revenue" loop—comparable to a supplier financing a customer to buy more of its products. A prominent example is NVIDIA's investment in OpenAI, which is expected to generate around $13 billion in revenue for NVIDIA, much of which may be reinvested back into OpenAI. While CEO Jensen Huang dismisses the "circular financing" critique as "absurd," arguing the investments are confidence votes in long-term generational shifts, some analysts express discomfort. They note that while investments in critical supply chain components like optics are strategically sound, funding new cloud providers like CoreWeave feels like "pre-paying for your own GPUs." The strategy carries significant risks. If the AI investment cycle turns, the market may question how much demand is genuine versus artificially sustained by NVIDIA's own balance sheet. Despite posting record-breaking earnings—$215.9 billion in annual revenue and $120 billion in net profit for FY2026—NVIDIA's stock fell after its report, signaling that "beating expectations" may no longer be enough to assure investors about the duration of the AI spending boom. The article concludes that while a bubble isn't necessarily a fraud, NVIDIA's actions resemble adding soap to a bubble—making it appear more robust and durable. This creates a complex scenario requiring extreme冷静 from investors to distinguish between real structural growth and financial engineering.

marsbit13m ago

NVIDIA Begins Adding Soap to the Bubble

marsbit13m ago

Short Positions Have Been Squeezed Out: Will the Next Leg of the U.S. Stock AI Rally Continue in Seoul?

"Short Squeeze Exhausted: Will the Next Leg of the AI Rally Continue in Seoul?" A Nomura report suggests the US AI stock rally, which saw the S&P 500 rise ~16.6% in 28 days largely driven by 10 key stocks, may be pausing. The fuel from short covering, CTA fund positioning, and volatility-control strategies is nearing its limit. For the rally to continue, new momentum from retail and sentiment-driven FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) is needed. South Korea's market provided a potential answer on the very day the report was published. The KOSPI index surged 4.32%, triggering a buy-side circuit breaker, led by massive gains in chip giants SK Hynix (+11.98%) and Samsung. This surge is characterized by retail "hynix FOMO" and overseas funds precisely buying into AI themes via chip-focused ETFs, shifting from broad Korean market ETFs. The Korean rally is a high-beta extension of the US AI capital expenditure story, as major cloud providers plan massive infrastructure spending, directly benefiting memory chip leaders. However, this linkage also implies vulnerability. The sustainability of this next leg depends on whether US tech stocks correct, the trajectory of US inflation (with upcoming CPI data key), and geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. Seoul has emerged as the new epicenter of the AI trade, but its fate remains tied to these broader macro and market dynamics.

marsbit18m ago

Short Positions Have Been Squeezed Out: Will the Next Leg of the U.S. Stock AI Rally Continue in Seoul?

marsbit18m ago

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbit1h ago

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片