Solana’s quiet takeover – Can SOL profit from the FUD around Ethereum?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-08Last updated on 2026-02-08

Abstract

Amidst significant market volatility, Solana (SOL) is demonstrating notable outperformance against Ethereum (ETH) across several key metrics, suggesting a potential capital rotation. SOL's perpetual trading volume recently reached $12.1 billion, surpassing ETH's $9.6 billion. Furthermore, Solana's institutional outflows were significantly lower, and its stablecoin market capitalization grew by 8.5% this week, heavily fueled by new USDC minting, while Ethereum's remained nearly flat. This divergence occurs as large Ethereum holders, like Trend Research, have been offloading substantial positions at a loss. The SOL/ETH ratio is holding near a critical support level of 0.04, which historically preceded a major rally. This confluence of factors—strong on-chain activity, lighter FUD, and a favorable technical setup—positions Solana as a potentially attractive risk-reward alternative, indicating its recent strength may be more than a coincidence.

Nothing in the market right now is just “coincidence.”

Volatility is hitting risk assets hard. After three days of outflows pushed major top-cap assets below key support, the market saw a sharp single-day move of over 10% on 06 February. This caught many off guard.

In this kind of environment, investors are naturally cautious, relying more on data than luck. So, when Solana [SOL] starts outpacing Ethereum [ETH] across key metrics, it clearly signals more than just short-term momentum.

One example is perpetuals trading volume. Solana recently posted $12.1 billion compared to Ethereum’s $9.6 billion, roughly 26% higher. Higher perps volume here implies stronger trading activity and market interest.

Backing this momentum, Solana’s institutional FUD is relatively lighter, with ETFs posting about $18 million in net outflows over the past three days, compared to Ethereum’s $180 million over the same period.

Meanwhile, on the DeFi side, the divergence is clear – Solana’s stablecoin market is up 8.5% this week, while Ethereum’s is nearly flat at 0.2%. The former has been fueled by $2.75 billion in USDC minted on Solana over the same period.

Together, these metrics may be evidence of growing activity rotating towards SOL. However, as AMBCrypto noted previously, in the current market, nothing happens by chance. So, could this rotation be a sign of something deeper?

Solana gains traction as SOL/ETH holds near support

For Ethereum, the past few days have been rough.

As LookOnChain flagged, Trend Research has nearly sold all of its ETH. They withdrew 792,532 ETH at $3,267, and later deposited 772,865 ETH back to Binance at $2,326, resulting in a total loss of roughly $747 million.

In this context, the SOL/ETH ratio trading in a tight range near the support starts to make sense. At the time of writing, the ratio was around 0.04 – A level that sparked a 35% rebound during the Q3 2025 rally. Hence, this could allude to similar upside potential.

Couple this with Solana outperforming Ethereum across key metrics and the ongoing FUD around ETH as big players offload their holdings, and the setup looks like a potential rotation of capital towards SOL.

In short, the SOL/ETH ratio chopping sideways isn’t just a “coincidence.”

Instead, if this trend holds over the next few days, it could set the stage for another SOL rally. This could involve rotational flows, strong on-chain activity, and market sentiment, making Solana a relatively attractive risk-reward play.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana is outperforming Ethereum across key metrics, indicating growing capital rotation towards SOL.
  • The SOL/ETH ratio has been holding near 0.04 – A historically strong support level.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, which key metric did Solana recently outperform Ethereum in, and by what margin?

ASolana recently outperformed Ethereum in perpetuals trading volume, posting $12.1 billion compared to Ethereum's $9.6 billion, which is roughly 26% higher.

QWhat does the article suggest is the significance of the SOL/ETH ratio holding near the 0.04 level?

AThe article suggests that the 0.04 level is a historically strong support level that sparked a 35% rebound during a previous rally, alluding to similar upside potential for SOL.

QWhat was the difference in net ETF outflows between Ethereum and Solana over the past three days mentioned in the article?

AEthereum's ETFs posted about $180 million in net outflows, while Solana's were relatively lighter at about $18 million over the same three-day period.

QHow does the article describe the performance of Solana's stablecoin market compared to Ethereum's this week?

ASolana's stablecoin market was up 8.5% this week, while Ethereum's was nearly flat at 0.2% growth.

QWhat major event involving Trend Research contributed to the FUD around Ethereum, as cited in the article?

ATrend Research nearly sold all of its ETH, withdrawing it at a higher price and depositing it back to an exchange at a lower price, resulting in a total loss of roughly $747 million.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit9m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit9m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片