Solana: Why SOL risks a 30% drop after losing KEY support

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-30Last updated on 2026-01-30

Abstract

The crypto market faced a slump, intensifying selling pressure on Solana (SOL) as sentiment turned bearish. SOL lost a key support level at $118, which it had held since March 2024. A whale deposited 2M USDC on Hyperliquid DEX and opened a $6.15M SOL short position. U.S. Solana spot ETFs also saw outflows of $2.22M. SOL dropped 6.65% to $115, with trading volume surging 105%. Technical analysis suggests a potential 30% decline to $78 if SOL remains below $118. The 50-day EMA and ADX support the bearish outlook. Derivatives data shows significant leveraged short positions, reflecting trader expectations of further downside.

The crypto market faced a slump, intensifying selling pressure on Solana [SOL] as trader and investor sentiment turned increasingly bearish.

Within this broader sell‐off, SOL was hit the hardest. It lost a key support level at $118, which it had successfully defended since March 2024.

Adding to the bearish outlook, a newly created wallet deposited 2 million USDC on the Hyperliquid DEX and opened multiple short positions. This reflects the current market outlook, according to the crypto tracker Onchain Lens.

Further analysis of the whale’s activity shows that it has opened a massive SOL short position worth $6.15 million at the $122.91 level.

This sell-off is not limited to the crypto market alone; it has also been observed on Wall Street.

According to on-chain analytics platform SoSoValue, U.S.–based Solana spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded a significant outflow of $2.22 million. This suggests that investors and institutions are withdrawing capital from the underlying asset.

Both developments highlight market sentiment toward Solana, and their impact is reflected in the asset’s price.

Solana price action and key levels

At press time, SOL plunged 6.65% over the past 24 hours and was trading near $115.

Despite the price decline, market participation surged significantly, with SOL’s trading volume jumping 105% to $7.60 billion during the same period. This indicates strong interest from traders and investors, leading to heavy market participation.

Looking at the price charts, it appears that SOL has lost one of its strongest key support levels at $118, which it had been holding since March 2024.

On the weekly chart, the asset had previously rebounded from this support more than ten times, but SOL has now failed to hold it.

On the daily chart, price action suggests that SOL could see a strong downside move, potentially declining by 30% and reaching the $78 level in the coming days.

However, this outlook would only be validated if the asset remains below or closes a daily candle under the $118 level.

Technical indicators, including the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) and the Average Directional Index (ADX), support SOL’s bearish outlook.

Notably, SOL was trading below the 50 EMA, indicating that the asset is bearish in the short term.

Meanwhile, the ADX, which measures the strength of the current trend, had risen to 33, above the key threshold of 25, suggesting that SOL is experiencing a strong directional trend.

Traders eye short-leveraged positions

From a derivatives perspective, traders appear to be strongly positioned on the bearish side.

According to CoinGlass data, intraday traders are closely monitoring two critical price levels. On the downside, the focus is on $112.8, while on the upside, attention centers around $120.2.

At these levels, traders have established significant leveraged positions. Short‐leveraged positions total $55.15 million, while long‐leveraged positions are far larger, amounting to $241 million.

This positioning highlights the market’s current tension, with traders preparing for sharp moves in either direction.

This positioning clearly reflects how intraday traders are viewing SOL at the moment.


Final Thoughts

  • Bearish activity from market participants has strengthened Solana’s negative outlook.
  • Price action suggests that another 30% drop in SOL could be on the cards if the asset remains below the $118 level.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat key support level did Solana (SOL) lose, and why is it significant?

ASolana lost the key support level at $118, which it had successfully defended since March 2024. This level is significant because the price had rebounded from it more than ten times on the weekly chart, making it a historically strong support. Losing it suggests a potential shift in market structure and opens the door for further downside.

QWhat on-chain and institutional activities are contributing to SOL's bearish pressure?

AA newly created wallet deposited 2 million USDC on Hyperliquid DEX and opened a massive $6.15 million SOL short position. Additionally, U.S.-based Solana spot ETFs recorded a significant outflow of $2.22 million, indicating that both large traders and institutional investors are withdrawing capital or betting against the asset.

QAccording to the price chart analysis, what is the potential downside target for SOL?

AThe price action on the daily chart suggests that SOL could see a strong downside move, potentially declining by 30% from its current level to reach the $78 level in the coming days, provided it remains below the $118 support.

QWhat do the technical indicators (50-day EMA and ADX) reveal about SOL's current trend?

ASOL was trading below the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), indicating a bearish short-term trend. The Average Directional Index (ADX) had risen to 33, which is above the key threshold of 25, suggesting that the current downtrend is strong and has significant momentum.

QHow are derivatives traders positioned regarding SOL, and what does it indicate?

ADerivatives data shows that intraday traders are focused on the $112.8 (downside) and $120.2 (upside) price levels. There are $55.15 million in short-leveraged positions and a much larger $241 million in long-leveraged positions. This creates significant market tension and indicates that traders are preparing for a sharp price move in either direction, with a large number of long positions at risk if the price falls further.

Related Reads

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit5m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit5m ago

Claude's Major New Feature: Screen Recording + Voice, Distilling Your Skills into AI Tasks in One Click

Claude has introduced a major new feature called "Record a Skill," available for Pro, Max, and Team users. This function, found in the Claude desktop app's CoWork menu, allows users to create reusable AI skills simply by recording their screen and providing voice narration while performing a task. Claude then automatically analyzes the recording and generates a functional Skill. A hands-on test confirmed the feature works seamlessly. Users start recording via the Skills manager, perform their workflow while verbally explaining the steps and logic, and avoid including sensitive information. After recording, Claude processes the content and creates the Skill, which can be saved and later invoked with a slash command (/). This eliminates the need for manual adjustments or writing complex instruction files. The innovation goes beyond mere efficiency. Previously, creating a Skill required writing a detailed SKILL.md file in Markdown—a significant barrier for non-technical users. "Record a Skill" bypasses this by directly capturing both actions and the implicit reasoning shared in the narration. This lowers the barrier to knowledge transfer and automation, addressing a core challenge in corporate knowledge management: the difficulty of getting experts to write and maintain documentation. However, the feature also highlights a shift in the nature of work. A case study from March 2026 showed a freelancer whose five-year client relationship was effectively replaced by a hand-coded Claude Skill automating their content workflow. With the even lower barrier of screen recording, the ability to distill personal expertise into automatable skills accelerates this trend. The "moat" for work is moving from simply knowing how to do a task to mastering tasks that are difficult or impossible to automate.

marsbit9m ago

Claude's Major New Feature: Screen Recording + Voice, Distilling Your Skills into AI Tasks in One Click

marsbit9m ago

Feeding AI "Noise" Can Also Boost Scores, This Work Enables Positive Transfer with Noise

Feeding "Noise" to AI Can Improve Performance: A Method Enables Positive Transfer from Noise This work, Semi-Supervised Noise Adaptation (SSNA), introduces a Noise Adaptation Framework (NAF) that challenges traditional transfer learning. Instead of requiring a labeled source domain of real data (e.g., images, text), NAF uses randomly generated Gaussian noise as the source. For a target task with C classes, it constructs C noise clusters by sampling from Gaussian distributions. Although this synthetic noise contains no semantic meaning, NAF trains it to form a discriminative class structure in a shared representation space—clustering same-class noise and separating different classes. The key is aligning this learned structure from the noise domain to the real, sparsely labeled target domain. A small number of target labels are still essential to establish the correspondence between noise clusters and actual classes. The training objective combines: 1) supervised loss on the few labeled target samples, 2) classification loss for the noise to build its structure, and 3) a distribution alignment loss (using Negative Domain Similarity) to minimize the gap between the noise and target domains in the shared space. Experiments show significant gains in few-label settings. With just 4 labels per class, NAF with a ResNet-18 backbone improves accuracy over a standard supervised baseline (ERM) by +12.35% on CIFAR-10, +7.61% on CIFAR-100, +4.38% on DTD-47, and +2.74% on Caltech-101. It also benefits fine-grained datasets and scales to ImageNet-1K (with 100 labels/class) and text classification (AG News). NAF can be integrated into existing semi-supervised methods like FixMatch for further gains. Ablation studies confirm the transferred benefit comes from the discriminative structure of the noise, not randomness itself. Collapsing all noise into a single point causes negative transfer, while increasing separation between noise cluster centers improves performance. The amount of noise per class is less critical once a basic structure forms. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that for positive transfer, the semantic content of source data may not be necessary. What can be effectively transferred is the *organizational structure* of categories within a representation space. This offers a promising alternative for scenarios where real source data is unavailable due to privacy, copyright, or procurement constraints.

marsbit11m ago

Feeding AI "Noise" Can Also Boost Scores, This Work Enables Positive Transfer with Noise

marsbit11m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片