Solana vs. Ethereum heats up – Is the ‘ETH killer’ narrative finally real?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-20Last updated on 2025-12-20

Abstract

The competition between Solana and Ethereum intensifies as Solana demonstrates significant on-chain growth, positioning it to potentially surpass Ethereum in annual revenue for the first time with $1.4 billion. This surge is largely driven by Solana's dominance in the Real World Asset (RWA) sector, which has grown 372% compared to Ethereum's 198%, attracting substantial capital inflows. Despite a bearish SOL/ETH price ratio in 2025, Solana has shown relative strength with a higher high on the 12-month chart. Its scalability and increasing network activity suggest that its on-chain dominance may soon reflect in price performance, making it a key competitor to watch.

The competition between L1s has never been this tight.

As blockchain adoption grows, L1s are upgrading their infrastructure to attract more real-world use cases. In 2025, the pace of back-to-back upgrades has accelerated, pushing mainstream adoption even further.

Notably, Solana and Ethereum remain at the center of this rivalry. Over the years, both L1s have gone head-to-head.

However, it looks like Solana [SOL] might finally be living up to its “Ethereum-killer” narrative.

Solana set to overtake Ethereum in annual revenue

Over time, L1s have seriously widened their playbook.

In other words, each chain is branching into new sectors. Take the RWA (Real World Asset) space, which is a standout.

According to RWA.xyz, it has added around $14 billion in value this year alone, up 240% in 2025.

From a revenue perspective, that’s a big deal as network activity ramps up. Notably, Solana seems to be leaning into this strategy, putting it on track to surpass Ethereum [ETH] for the first time with $1.4 billion in Annual Revenue.

Naturally, it shows Solana’s on-chain usage is firing.

According to the chart above, Solana’s revenue has jumped from a measly $28 million in 2021 to $2.5 billion YTD in 2025, while Ethereum has slid from $5 billion+ peaks to $1.4 billion. But is this reflected on-chain?

Looking at RWA growth, it’s clear: Solana’s up 372%, Ethereum 198%.

Technically, that’s 2× more RWA capital flowing into Solana, which lines up with its growing revenue lead. In short, SOL’s scalability is proving its edge.

Solana’s surge shakes up the SOL/ETH balance

No doubt, SOL’s on-chain dominance hasn’t yet translated into price action.

From a technical perspective, the SOL/ETH ratio has experienced a fully bearish 2025, erasing all of the 27% rally it posted in 2024. Consequently, this has left Solana relatively weaker in terms of holding support.

However, when we zoom in, a notable divergence shows up.

Despite the overall drawdown, the SOL/ETH ratio still managed to post a higher high on the 12-month candle, reaching as high as 0.93 in mid-January.

In plain terms, Solana has shown pockets of relative strength this year.

From an investor’s perspective, that could be enough to keep SOL in the race to compete with (or even overtake) ETH in the next rally, with the SOL/ETH ratio chopping sideways around 0.042 on the weekly.

Add in Solana’s growing dominance, and its revenue lead becomes no fluke.

At this pace, it seems like only a matter of time before this resilience starts showing in price, making SOL one to watch heading into 2026.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s on-chain growth is driving a revenue surge, putting it on track to surpass Ethereum for the first time.
  • Despite a bearish SOL/ETH price ratio in 2025, Solana shows pockets of strength, suggesting its on-chain dominance could soon translate into price action.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报57m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报57m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片