Solana vs Ethereum – $4.4T traded, RWA holders flipped – But who wins?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-08Last updated on 2026-03-08

Abstract

Solana's trading activity has surged over three years, accumulating $4.4 trillion in total volume. Weekly trading, once below $10 billion, grew significantly in 2024, often reaching $20–40 billion and briefly spiking to $120–130 billion during memecoin-driven speculation. It has since stabilized around $12–15 billion, reflecting sustained retail demand due to its low-fee structure. In Real World Assets (RWA), Solana surpassed Ethereum in holder count (154,942 vs. 153,592), indicating broader retail accessibility. However, Ethereum leads in RWA value ($15.45B vs. $1.79B), maintaining its role as the institutional hub. Despite high trading volume, Solana's liquidity is thinner (0.4 liquidity-to-volume ratio vs. Ethereum’s 4.57), making it efficient for small trades but challenging for large orders. It benefits from $15.4B in stablecoin supply and high throughput with minimal fees. Ethereum retains a structural advantage with deeper liquidity and institutional settlement capabilities.

Solana’s trading activity has expanded sharply over the past three years, accumulating roughly $4.4 trillion in total token trading volume.

Early periods showed modest weekly activity, often remaining below $10 billion. This phase reflected the network’s early adoption stage.

However, momentum accelerated through 2024 as weekly turnover climbed steadily. Activity frequently moved into the $20–$40 billion range.

That shift signaled rising participation across decentralized trading venues and memecoin ecosystems built on Solana.

Later, volatility intensified as several weeks recorded dramatic surges. At the peak, trading volume briefly reached about $120–$130 billion.

These spikes aligned with speculative bursts and memecoin-driven liquidity cycles across the Solana ecosystem.

Yet the surge proved temporary, and activity cooled afterward. Weekly volumes gradually compressed, indicating that speculative enthusiasm faded while core usage persisted.

As of press time, the network generated roughly $12–$15 billion in weekly trading volume. This level remains significantly higher than early-cycle activity.

Thus, the trajectory reveals a hybrid structure.

Speculative spikes amplify short-term volume, while stabilized baselines suggest that Solana’s low-fee architecture continues attracting persistent retail trading demand.

Solana overtakes Ethereum in RWA holders

As Solana’s [SOL] trading activity expands, tokenized RWAs provide another lens into how its ecosystem is evolving beyond speculative markets.

Participation data begins to reveal shifting adoption dynamics across major networks.

Ethereum [ETH] still leads in capital concentration, securing roughly $15.45 billion in RWAs across 675 assets. This scale reflects strong institutional issuance and established financial integrations.

However, wallet distribution presents a different perspective.

Solana recorded roughly 154,942 RWA holders, slightly exceeding Ethereum’s 153,592 holders. This crossover suggested broader retail accessibility within Solana’s infrastructure.

At the same time, Solana’s total RWA value remained lower at around $1.79 billion, indicating an earlier stage of capital deployment.

Elsewhere, participation declines sharply.

BNB Chain [BNB] hosts roughly 39,218 holders, while Polygon records about 15,482 users.

Taken together, the structure suggests Ethereum remains the institutional hub, while Solana increasingly functions as a retail gateway for tokenized financial assets.

Volume surge test Solana’s liquidity resilience

Solana’s trading surge signals strong activity, yet underlying liquidity reveals a more complex structure.

DeFiLlama data showed $6.53 billion in TVL supporting $14.96 billion in weekly DEX volume. This produces a 0.4 liquidity-to-volume ratio, far thinner than Ethereum’s 4.57 benchmark.

As a result, smaller trades execute with minimal slippage, reinforcing Solana’s appeal among retail traders.

However, larger orders still encounter shallow depth, where price impact rises quickly during demand spikes.

On top of that, roughly $15.4 billion in stablecoin supply supported more than 60% of trading pairs.

This stablecoin liquidity helped maintain continuous market activity across Solana-based exchanges.

Meanwhile, the network processed roughly 3.4K transactions per second while Average Transaction Fees stayed below $0.00025.

Yet Ethereum preserves a structural edge through $160 billion in stablecoins and expanding RWA liquidity, suggesting a layered market where Solana drives trading velocity while Ethereum anchors institutional settlement.


Final Summary

  • Solana continues attracting strong retail trading activity as weekly volumes stabilize near $15 billion, though liquidity depth remains thinner than Ethereum’s institutional capital base.
  • Ethereum retains structural dominance through deeper stablecoin and RWA liquidity.

Related Questions

QWhat was the peak weekly trading volume reached on Solana, and what was the primary driver behind such spikes?

AThe peak weekly trading volume on Solana briefly reached about $120–$130 billion. These spikes aligned with speculative bursts and memecoin-driven liquidity cycles across the Solana ecosystem.

QWhich blockchain currently has more holders of Real World Assets (RWA), and what does this suggest about its user base?

ASolana currently has more RWA holders with roughly 154,942, slightly exceeding Ethereum's 153,592. This suggests broader retail accessibility within Solana’s infrastructure, while Ethereum remains the institutional hub.

QHow does Solana's liquidity-to-volume ratio compare to Ethereum's, and what are the implications for traders?

ASolana has a liquidity-to-volume ratio of 0.4, which is far thinner than Ethereum’s benchmark of 4.57. This means smaller trades on Solana execute with minimal slippage, appealing to retail traders, but larger orders encounter shallow depth and greater price impact during demand spikes.

QWhat is the current approximate weekly trading volume on Solana, and how does it compare to its early activity?

AAs of press time, Solana generates roughly $12–$15 billion in weekly trading volume. This level remains significantly higher than its early-cycle activity, which often remained below $10 billion weekly.

QWhat key advantage does Ethereum maintain over Solana according to the final summary of the article?

AAccording to the final summary, Ethereum retains structural dominance through deeper stablecoin and RWA liquidity, anchoring institutional settlement.

Related Reads

Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

In a recent interview, Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, addresses the central anxiety of the AI era. He argues the primary risk isn't AI's intelligence, but human passivity—ceding decisions, privacy, and agency to centralized systems or "super AIs" for a sense of "disempowering safety." His solution is not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies." These are optional, non-totalizing spaces that protect users while preserving their sovereignty and privacy. Ethereum is presented as a prime example, offering a parallel financial system one can freely choose, not a fix for the old one. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik notes the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years. To keep up, individuals must actively pilot their lives, not be passive passengers. He stresses that active learning vastly outperforms passive learning, even with equal time invested. His practical advice for builders and individuals in the AI age includes: periodically forcing oneself to do tasks manually to keep the mind engaged; prioritizing active learning and verification over outsourcing answers; building tools that help retain human agency; not outsourcing all strategic thinking to AI; and preserving serendipity through real-world interactions. Ultimately, Buterin redefines Ethereum/crypto's role: not to win against or fix the old world, but to provide a free, optional alternative. The core message is that as AI grows more powerful, the truly scarce resource will be proactive humans who retain their sovereignty, privacy, and capacity for independent thought. The era demands not less tool use, but more intentional and active use of technology.

链捕手2h ago

Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

链捕手2h ago

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

**Summary: Inside Anthropic's Massive, Opaque Secondary Market** In a revealing interview, Patagon founder Dio Casares pulls back the curtain on the booming, high-risk secondary market for shares in companies like Anthropic. This private market, fueled by companies staying private longer and massive funding rounds, is estimated to involve hundreds of billions of dollars. Casares distinguishes between two types of "secondary" trading: 1. **Company-approved SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) sales:** Where new capital flows into the company, often facilitated by select private equity firms. Anthropic supports this to manage liquidity and pre-IPO selling pressure. 2. **The "gray" market:** Platforms like Hive and Forge that match buyers and sellers, often creating pricing confusion and competing with official funding rounds. These intermediaries are widely disliked by companies. The market structure is complex and fragmented, relying heavily on personal connections. Brokers connect buyers and sellers, often layering multiple SPVs to pool capital, with single transaction fees as high as 10%. Strikingly, some finance professionals earn more from this trading than from their primary investment roles. **Key risks highlighted include:** * **High Fraud Rates:** An estimated 10-20% of transactions involve fake stock certificates or sellers who take payment without having the shares. * **Complex, Risky Structures:** Nested SPVs, "forward contracts" on employee equity, and tokenized private equity create layers of opacity. This is exemplified by a recent incident where an xAI employee's shares were revoked after an espionage allegation, leaving buyers empty-handed. * **Post-IPO "Settlement Hell":** After an IPO, delays in distributing shares through multiple SPV layers and decisions by fund managers to hold onto shares could trigger years of lawsuits as downstream investors are locked out. **For small investors** holding positions through tokenized vehicles or layered SPVs, it's often impossible to verify the underlying asset. Casares advises caution: if the investment feels wrong, consider exiting. As the private market now surpasses IPO fundraising, this "wild west" ecosystem faces a looming reckoning. While it will likely professionalize, the post-IPO period for a company like Anthropic could unleash a wave of disputes, exposing the vulnerabilities built into this frenzied, largely unregulated marketplace.

marsbit4h ago

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片