Solana Tries To Turn Fear Into FOMO — Can STRIDE Really Stop The Next $300M Rug?

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-04-07Last updated on 2026-04-07

Abstract

The Solana Foundation has launched a new security initiative called STRIDE (Solana Trust, Resilience and Infrastructure for DeFi Enterprises) in collaboration with Asymmetric Research. This framework is designed to continuously assess and oversee the security of projects built on Solana through an eight-pillar system, with results made public. Alongside STRIDE, the Solana Incident Response Network (SIRN) was introduced—a coalition of security firms focused on threat intelligence and coordinated responses to hacks. These efforts follow a recent $286 million exploit on the Drift Protocol and represent a shift toward continuous, foundation-funded security monitoring rather than one-time audits. While these measures may help restore trust, new exploits on unaudited protocols could still face severe market reactions.

The Solana Foundation has unveiled new security initiatives framed as a “new wave” of ecosystem security.

Solana Attempts To Rebuild The Trust

This Monday, the Solana Foundation announced on a blog post the launching, in collaboration with Asymmetric Research, of the STRIDE (Solana Trust, Resilience and Infrastructure for DeFi Enterprises) program. STRIDE is an organized framework designed to continuously assess and oversee the security of projects built on the ecosystem.

According to Assymetric Research’s own blog post, STRIDE works as an eight‐pillar security framework that will carry out independent reviews of ecosystem protocols to verify they comply with it. The results of these assessments will be released publicly, giving users and investors clear visibility into the safety of the platforms they use.

In parallel to STRIDE, the foundation also released the Solana Incident Response Network (SIRN), a member‐driven coalition of security companies and researchers focused exclusively on the Solana ecosystem. According to the blog post, founding participants of the membership-based network include Asymmetric Research, OtterSec, Neodyme, Squads, and ZeroShadow. SIRN is the “war room”, sharing threat intel and coordinating live hack responses across the ecosystem.

The new initiatives sit on top of existing tools like Hypernative, Range, Riverguard, Sec3, and AuditWare, which are offered free to builders to harden code from day one. This is a core shift away from one‐off audits toward continuous, foundation‐funded monitoring, public security reports and coordinated incident response.

A Shift In Security Protocols, But A Shift In Sentiment?

These moves directly follow the April 1st $286 million attack on the Solana-based Drift Protocol that ended up being attributed to North Korean hackers.

The blog post, however, makes no mention of the attack. Despite that, it does spell out the need to strengthen the security services the foundation offers.

Solana was built for security. And as the ecosystem scales, the stakes scale with it (...) Solana Foundation has a long history of dedicating resources to ensure that security services and tools are available to the ecosystem.

While it is true that security headlines and follow‐through on STRIDE/SIRN may help repair sentiment after the Drift shock, any new exploit on an unevaluated protocol could be punished harder.

At the moment of writing, SOL trades for exactly $80 on the daily chart. Source: SOLUSD on Tradingview.

Cover image from Perplexity. SOLUSD chart from Tradingview.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the name of the new security program launched by the Solana Foundation and Asymmetric Research?

AThe new security program is called STRIDE, which stands for Solana Trust, Resilience and Infrastructure for DeFi Enterprises.

QWhat is the primary function of the Solana Incident Response Network (SIRN)?

ASIRN is a member-driven coalition of security companies and researchers that acts as a 'war room', sharing threat intelligence and coordinating live hack responses across the Solana ecosystem.

QWhich major security incident on the Solana ecosystem preceded the announcement of these new security initiatives?

AThe initiatives directly follow the April 1st $286 million attack on the Solana-based Drift Protocol, which was attributed to North Korean hackers.

QHow does the STRIDE program aim to improve security for users and investors?

ASTRIDE conducts independent reviews of ecosystem protocols and publicly releases the results of these assessments, giving users and investors clear visibility into the safety of the platforms they use.

QWhat core shift in security approach do these new initiatives represent?

AThey represent a core shift away from one-off audits toward continuous, foundation-funded monitoring, public security reports, and coordinated incident response.

Related Reads

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News8m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News8m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit25m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit25m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手37m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手37m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit52m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片