Solana processes 8x transactions more than BNB Chain – Details

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

While the broader crypto market moved sideways in February 2026, Solana's on-chain activity surged, processing 3.4 billion transactions—an 11% increase from January. This volume was eight times greater than that of the next largest network, BNB Chain, which handled 424 million transactions. Although Ethereum's mainnet saw only 62 million transactions, its Layer-2 networks like Base and Arbitrum absorbed significant activity. Solana also saw strong institutional support with nearly $950 million in net inflows into its ETFs. Despite a 12% monthly price decline to around $90, realized loss data suggests the worst of the selling pressure may be over, with the market entering a more stable phase.

While the broader crypto market spent February 2026 moving sideways amid global uncertainty, one ecosystem seemed to follow a different path.

New data from DeFi Dev Corp. (DFDV) shows that Solana [SOL] processed over 3.4 billion transactions in February, marking an 11% increase compared to January.

This is noteworthy because during the same period, major networks like Ethereum [ETH] and Bitcoin [BTC] saw activity slow down as market sentiment weakened.

How are other chains performing?

Following behind Solana is the second-largest network, BNB Chain, which handled around 424 million transactions.

This means that Solana processed about eight times more activity than its closest competitor, dwarfing other networks’ on-chain activity.

The data also reveals an important trend within the Ethereum ecosystem wherein Ethereum’s main network recorded only 62 million transactions, placing it near the bottom of the list.

Is Ethereum in trouble?

Even though Ethereum’s main network saw significantly fewer transactions, this does not mean the ecosystem as a whole is declining.

Instead, much of the activity has moved to Layer-2 networks, which offer lower costs and faster transactions.

For example, Base, the Layer-2 network backed by Coinbase, processed 316 million transactions, showing strong retail activity. Meanwhile, Arbitrum recorded 123 million, and Optimism recorded 68 million, and continued to see stable usage.

This suggests that Ethereum’s biggest competitor may not be another Layer-1 chain. Instead, its own scaling networks are gradually absorbing most of the activity, though even these networks still fall far behind Solana’s transaction volume.

Solana witnsses strong institutional push

Beyond network activity, Solana also saw strong support from institutional investors.

Since their launch, Spot Solana ETFs have attracted around $950 million in net inflows with mostly inflow streaks, according to data from Farside Investors.

Meanwhile, on the price front, like many assets that struggled to find direction in February, SOL too witnessed a monthly decline of over 12%, but at press time, it traded around $90.09, rising 7.46% within 24 hours.

Moreover, this coincided with AMBCrypto’s report about Solana holding ~53% of the $15.34 billion USDC supply, making it one of the largest hubs for stablecoin activity.

What is the data saying?

According to Santiment data, Solana’s Net Realized Profit/Loss remained largely negative throughout late January and February, with most bars turning red. This signals that many holders were selling their tokens at a loss as prices declined.

Furthermore, a major spike in early February shows losses nearing $1.3 billion, suggesting a wave of panic selling as SOL dropped sharply from around $140 to below $90.

Since then, the size of the loss bars has gradually decreased, indicating that selling pressure is easing as the price stabilizes between $80 and $90.

This trend suggests that much of the forced selling may already have occurred, with the market entering a more stable phase.

Yet, despite the strong numbers, an important question remains: can this momentum continue in the months ahead, or will market conditions begin to slow it down?


Final Summary

  • Processing 3.4 billion transactions in a single month places Solana far ahead of competing blockchains in raw activity.
  • Realized loss data shows that much of the panic selling may have already occurred, with selling pressure gradually easing as the price stabilizes.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow many transactions did Solana process in February 2026, and what was the percentage increase compared to January?

ASolana processed over 3.4 billion transactions in February 2026, marking an 11% increase compared to January.

QAccording to the article, how many more transactions did Solana process than its closest competitor, BNB Chain?

ASolana processed about eight times more transactions than BNB Chain, handling over 3.4 billion compared to BNB Chain's 424 million.

QWhat reason is given for Ethereum's mainnet having relatively low transaction numbers, and which Layer-2 networks are mentioned as handling significant volume?

AThe article states that much of Ethereum's activity has moved to Layer-2 networks, which offer lower costs and faster transactions. The Layer-2 networks mentioned are Base (316M transactions), Arbitrum (123M), and Optimism (68M).

QWhat was the net inflow amount for Spot Solana ETFs since their launch, according to data from Farside Investors?

ASince their launch, Spot Solana ETFs attracted around $950 million in net inflows.

QWhat does the negative Net Realized Profit/Loss data for Solana signal, and what does the decreasing size of the loss bars indicate?

AThe negative Net Realized Profit/Loss data signals that many holders were selling their SOL tokens at a loss as prices declined. The decreasing size of the loss bars indicates that selling pressure is easing as the price stabilizes.

Related Reads

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit11m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit11m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit20m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit20m ago

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

Bank of America (BofA) is making strategic moves in digital assets, appointing senior leaders to advance a platform covering stablecoins, tokenized deposits, custody, and crypto settlement. This comes amid a broader discussion about the potential migration of trillions in bank deposits to stablecoins. A cited TBAC report estimated up to $6.6 trillion in transactional deposits could be at risk of moving to stablecoins long-term, a point BofA's CEO previously conditioned on stablecoins being allowed to pay interest. The regulatory landscape is evolving, with the GENIUS Act setting a final implementation deadline for January 2027. Major banks, however, are not waiting; JPMorgan, Citi, BofA, and others are already developing tokenized deposit networks and services. Industry observers note that while retail crypto trading is sluggish, institutional adoption of stablecoins for real-world use cases is driving growth. Despite the activity, some analysts remain cautious, noting banks have a long history of blockchain announcements and that true structural change is slow. The stablecoin market itself has seen a recent dip from its peak. Optimistic projections, however, foresee significant growth, with stablecoin settlement volume already reaching $33 trillion in 2025. The race is on for the post-January 2027 landscape, where regulatory clarity is expected to accelerate the fusion of traditional finance and crypto.

marsbit25m ago

Bank of America Quietly Positions: Could $6 Trillion in Bank Deposits Flow into Stablecoins?

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片