Solana: How $30B in staked SOL unlocks new DeFi liquidity

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-18Last updated on 2026-02-18

Abstract

Over $30 billion in staked Solana (SOL) can now be used as collateral on Jupiter Lend without needing to unstake, unlocking significant liquidity for DeFi. This improves capital efficiency and may boost borrowing and trading activity across Solana. On-chain data shows cooling trading volumes are starting to stabilize, with active addresses flattening and whale activity increasing. SOL is testing a key support level around $80. If liquidity expands and whale participation continues, this zone could serve as a reversal point. Solana is at a critical inflection point, with improving fundamentals and a potential price reversal.

Over $30 billion worth of Solana [SOL] is currently staked, earning yield. Until now, however, that capital has been largely excluded from DeFi activity.

Notably, Jupiter, Solana’s leading DEX aggregator, has launched native staking as collateral. The feature is now live on Jupiter Lend, unlocking a significant pool of capital

Liquidity expansion enters a new phase

Staked SOL can now be used as collateral without the need to unstake, improving capital efficiency. By collateralizing staked tokens, yield remains intact while fresh liquidity enters the market.

This development could significantly increase available liquidity across the Solana ecosystem. More collateral means more borrowing, and more borrowing means more trading activity.

Solana may be on the verge of reigniting cooling volumes. According to the recent Volume Bubble Map data, Sol trading activity was flashing cooling signals.

Network activity is slowly reacting

The impact is already visible on Solana on-chain metrics.

Over the last few hours, the recent sharp drop in the number of Active Addresses has started to flatten. Participation is gaining momentum, and traders are returning.

Liquidity typically drives engagement, and in turn, engagement fuels volatility. This sequence now appears to be unfolding in real time.”

Whales position early

Order distribution data shows a large share of activity coming from SOL whales.

That detail matters. When large players position ahead of structural liquidity changes, it often signals strategic intent. Whales move early. Retail follows later.

Their dominance increases the probability of momentum expansion.

$80 demand zone faces the test

On the daily chart, SOL is testing a key demand zone around $80. That level aligns with pennant support. The confluence strengthens its importance.

If liquidity expands and whale activity persists, the $80 zone could act as a reversal platform. However, if it fails, the structure could weaken and create more room for a further bearish run.

Therefore, Solana’s fundamentals and positioning are improving. The token price is consolidating, and liquidity is being unlocked. Solana now stands at a critical inflection point, with a reversal appearing increasingly likely


Final Summary

  • Jupiter enables native staked SOL as collateral, unlocking $30 billion in capital.
  • Whale orders and active addresses surge as SOL tests $80 support.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat major feature did Jupiter launch on Jupiter Lend to unlock staked SOL for DeFi?

AJupiter launched native staking as collateral, allowing staked SOL to be used without unstaking it.

QHow much value of Solana (SOL) is currently staked and being unlocked for DeFi liquidity?

AOver $30 billion worth of Solana (SOL) is currently staked.

QWhat key price level is SOL testing on the daily chart, and why is it significant?

ASOL is testing the $80 demand zone, which aligns with pennant support, making it a critical level for potential reversal or further decline.

QHow has the recent development affected on-chain metrics like active addresses?

AThe recent sharp drop in active addresses has started to flatten, and participation is gaining momentum as traders return.

QWhy is the activity from SOL whales considered significant in the context of liquidity changes?

AWhales positioning early often signals strategic intent, and their dominance increases the probability of momentum expansion, with retail investors typically following later.

Related Reads

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit6m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit6m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手18m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手18m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit33m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit33m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手36m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手36m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片