Solana gains institutional access in Brazil – But why is SOL still stuck?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

Valour's Solana ETP (VSOL) received approval for listing on Brazil's B3 exchange, expanding regulated, BRL-denominated institutional access to SOL. Despite this development and continued ETF inflows of $3.64M daily, SOL's price remained range-bound between $122-$145, showing fragile and directionless action. Key factors include Bitcoin's market-wide weakness weighing on sentiment, SOL tokens leaving exchanges (reducing sell-side supply), and a dense liquidity cluster at $123 posing a downside risk. Technical indicators like RSI at 44.03 and a compressed MACD showed weak demand. A bullish reversal requires a break above $145 to target $170, but near-term direction remains tied to broader market risk sentiment.

Valour’s B3 approval expanded institutional access to Solana, while ETF inflows continued. Even so, price action remained fragile.

Institutional investors often gravitate toward growing ecosystems, and Solana drew attention despite lagging prices amid market weakness. Bitcoin’s repeated dips weighed on sentiment and spilled into major altcoins.

Despite expanding institutional access, Solana remained cautious and directionless. At press time, Solana [SOL] hovered near $128, trading inside the $122–$145 range.

Sideways movement suggested consolidation rather than a decisive trend.

Institutional access widens in Brazil

Valour received approval to list Valour Solana [VSOL] on Brazil’s B3 exchange on the 16th of December. The listing expanded BRL-denominated, regulated access to Solana through traditional brokerage and custody rails.

The move placed Solana alongside Bitcoin [BTC], Ethereum [ETH], Ripple [XRP], and Sui [SUI] on B3. By adding SOL to its Brazilian lineup, Valour increased Solana’s institutional visibility in a key Latin American market.

ETF inflows continued as exchange supply fell

Data from the SoSoValue dashboard showed Solana Spot ETFs continued to record Net Inflows. Daily inflows stood near $3.64 million, while total Net Assets remained close to $926.33 million.

The steady inflows coincided with SOL’s sideways price action inside its established range.

At the same time, SOL tokens continued leaving exchanges, immediately reducing available sell-side supply. This divergence pointed to accumulation behavior rather than aggressive short-term positioning.

Liquidity clusters kept downside risks active

Binance Liquidation Heatmap highlighted dense liquidity clusters around the $123 level. That zone increased the probability of a short-term sweep during continued weakness.

If Bitcoin extended its decline, SOL could lose range support and slide toward the $95 zone. Such a move would likely be driven by broader market weakness rather than SOL-specific selling.

Can bulls reclaim higher supply?

On the chart, Solana traded in the mid ranges, with buyers still lacking clear momentum.

RSI printed 44.03, showing demand remained weak and below the neutral 50 line. MACD stayed compressed, suggesting bearish pressure was fading but not fully reversed.

Solana needed to break above $145 to reclaim $170 so as to push through to the range highs. A stronger recovery could then open the path toward the $200 supply zone.

Despite ecosystem growth, those upside paths depended on risk sentiment stabilizing.


Final Thoughts

  • Valour’s B3 approval underscored growing institutional confidence in Solana’s ecosystem.
  • Liquidity risks and Bitcoin-led weakness continued to shape SOL’s near-term direction.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit17m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit17m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit26m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit26m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片