Solana dips below $120 as activity cools – Yet THIS group leans in, why?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-20Last updated on 2025-12-20

Abstract

Despite short-term volatility and declining activity metrics, Solana (SOL) demonstrated resilience as its price dipped below $120. While retail participation waned amid market fear, on-chain data revealed significant whale accumulation during the price weakness. A specific wallet purchased 41,000 SOL worth $5 million, following a historical pattern of profitable accumulation. Furthermore, Solana ETFs recorded $11 million in net inflows, indicating sustained institutional demand that counterbalanced spot selling pressure. Technically, SOL found support between $117-$122, with improving momentum indicators suggesting a potential reversal. The price action underscores a divergence between short-term fear and long-term conviction, with strategic investors showing confidence during the downturn.

Strong networks continued attracting capital despite short-term volatility across digital asset markets, even as some chain activity weakened and key support levels gave way.

Market fear reduced retail participation across crypto, pressuring usage metrics without erasing long-term network relevance. Solana remained one of the more resilient Layer-1 chains as risk appetite deteriorated.

Solana’s [SOL] network Revenue peaked sharply in January before declining to the lowest levels of the year.

The pullback erased earlier gains as trading activity slowed across decentralized applications. That contraction aligned with extreme fear conditions rather than signs of structural deterioration.

Weekly Active Addresses also trended lower during the same period. The decline reflected risk-off behavior and reduced retail participation across crypto markets.

Activity stabilized near recent lows as volatility compressed.

Solana whale accumulation emerges below $120

As Solana dropped back below $120 on the 18th of December, whale accumulation intensified across several wallets.

Wallet G6gemN bought 41,000 SOL worth approximately $5 million during the dip. The buying suggested strategic positioning into weakness rather than reactive selling.

Historical behavior added context to the move.

About eight months earlier, the same wallet accumulated 24,528 SOL near $122. It was later sold for around $175, realizing roughly $1.28 million in profit.

The renewed accumulation followed a familiar pattern. Price weakness attracted capital instead of triggering broad distribution. Whale behavior pointed toward confidence during periods of elevated fear.

SOL ETF inflows offset spot selling pressure

Spot Solana ETFs recorded $11 million in Net Inflows on the 18th of December. Institutional products continued absorbing supply even as spot prices weakened.

ETF demand counterbalanced selling pressure during the pullback.

Flows suggested positioning during fear-driven declines. Institutions appeared willing to accumulate amid heightened volatility. ETF activity reinforced demand beneath short-term weakness.

Support holds as momentum steadies

From a technical perspective, Solana traded near $124 at press time, after dipping from $122 to $117.

Bulls defended that zone, pushing price back into the broader $122–$145 accumulation range. Price action held around support, signaling absorption rather than continuation lower.

Momentum indicators also improved. MACD showed a developing bullish crossover, while RSI printed a bullish divergence as selling pressure faded near recent lows. Momentum improved as Solana remained within its established accumulation range.

That setup left traders focused on whether support could hold as broader sentiment stabilized.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s recent price action highlighted a growing divide between short-term participation and longer-term conviction.
  • While fear weighed on activity metrics, accumulation beneath support hinted at confidence during uncertainty.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the key price level that triggered increased whale accumulation for Solana?

AThe key price level that triggered increased whale accumulation was below $120, specifically on the 18th of December.

QHow did Solana ETF flows behave during the market dip and what was their significance?

ASolana ETFs recorded $11 million in net inflows on December 18th, which helped counterbalance spot selling pressure and indicated institutional accumulation during the fear-driven decline.

QWhat technical indicators showed improvement for Solana's price momentum near the support level?

AThe MACD showed a developing bullish crossover and the RSI printed a bullish divergence, indicating improving momentum as selling pressure faded near recent lows.

QHow did the activity on the Solana network, such as Weekly Active Addresses and Revenue, change during this period?

ASolana's network revenue declined to its lowest levels of the year, and Weekly Active Addresses also trended lower, reflecting reduced retail participation and risk-off behavior in the crypto markets.

QWhat does the behavior of 'Wallet G6gemN' suggest about large investors' strategy during the price dip?

AThe behavior of Wallet G6gemN, which bought 41,000 SOL during the dip, suggests a strategy of strategic positioning into weakness and accumulation during periods of elevated fear, rather than reactive selling.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit23m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit23m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit42m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit42m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit51m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit51m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片