SOL struggles as Solana TVL slides and memecoin demand fades

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-12Last updated on 2025-12-12

Abstract

SOL, the native token of the Solana blockchain, has struggled to maintain prices above $145 amid declining network activity and reduced demand for decentralized applications. The total value locked (TVL) on Solana has dropped by over $10 billion from its September peak, while weekly DApp revenues fell from $37 million to $26 million. Memecoin demand, a key driver for Solana, has weakened significantly since October’s market crash, contributing to a 67% drop in decentralized exchange volumes. Although Solana’s transaction count increased by 6%, network fees declined by 21%. SOL’s funding rates indicate low bullish leverage demand, reflecting weakened trader confidence after a 46% price decline over three months. Despite positive developments like the Firedancer mainnet launch and new products from Kamino, a sustained recovery to previous highs remains uncertain.

Key takeaways:

  • SOL funding rates signal low bullish conviction after a 46% price drop, despite Firedancer’s launch and rising Solana network transactions.

  • Solana DApp revenues and DEX activity have weakened sharply, suggesting broader market fatigue even as Solana’s ecosystem grows.

Solana’s native token, SOL (SOL), has failed to sustain prices above $145 for the past four weeks. A decline in network activity amid reduced demand for decentralized applications has negatively impacted SOL’s outlook.

With Solana’s TVL now down more than $10 billion from its September peak, onchain metrics are flashing signs that user participation is cooling faster than expected.

Solana TVL (left) vs. 7-day DApp revenues (right), USD. Source: DefiLlama

The total value locked (TVL) on Solana has been in decline since reaching its all-time high of $15 billion in September. Falling smart contract deposits increase the immediately available SOL supply for sale. Meanwhile, revenues from decentralized applications (DApps) on Solana dropped to $26 million per week, down from $37 million two months earlier.

Traders’ appetite for memecoins has also weakened since the cryptocurrency market flash crash on Oct. 10, an event that exposed critical flaws in leveraged positions and the overall liquidity of smaller altcoins. Regardless of whether derivatives markets amplified the move, traders became less comfortable with DEX platforms following the $19 billion liquidation event.

Memecoin market capitalization, USD. Source: TradingView

Memecoins have been a major driver for SOL, especially after the Official Trump (TRUMP) launch in January, which pushed decentralized exchange (DEX) volumes on Solana to $313.3 billion that month. According to DefiLlama data, this activity has since dropped by 67%, partly explaining the softer revenue trends across Solana DApps.

Still, the reduced demand for blockchain-based applications may reflect a broader market slowdown rather than a specific weakness in Solana.

Blockchains ranked by 30-day network fees. Source: Nansen

Solana network fees fell by 21% over the past 30 days, yet competing blockchains experienced steeper declines. Fees on the BNB Chain dropped 67%, while Ethereum saw a 41% decrease over the same period, according to Nansen data. Additionally, the number of transactions on Solana increased by 6%, while activity on the BNB Chain decreased by 42%.

SOL long leverage demand vanishes

SOL perpetual futures can provide a useful gauge of traders’ sentiment, as exchanges charge either buyers (longs) or sellers (shorts) based on leverage demand. In neutral conditions, the funding rate typically ranges between 6% and 12% per year, with longs paying to keep their positions open given the cost of capital. Conversely, a negative funding rate signals broader bearish sentiment.

SOL perpetual futures 8-hour funding rate. Source: CoinGlass

SOL’s annualized funding rate stood at 6% on Friday, showing weak demand for bullish leverage. The unusual 11% negative reading on Thursday should not be interpreted as heavy demand for bearish positions, as market makers moved quickly to stabilize imbalances. Still, it may take time for bulls to rebuild conviction after SOL’s 46% price decline over three months.

Several recent developments in the Solana ecosystem are expected to draw renewed investor interest, including Friday’s mainnet launch of Firedancer, a new validator client designed to expand processing capacity. The project took more than three years to build under the guidance of Jump Trading, one of the industry’s top market makers. Developers reported a strong response after the validator node re-synced in under two minutes.

Related: J.P. Morgan taps Solana for Galaxy’s tokenized corporate bond issuance

Kamino, the second-largest Solana DApp by TVL, also announced new products on Friday, including fixed-rate and fixed-term borrowing, offchain collateral, private credit and an onchain Bitcoin-backed institutional credit line. Kamino’s $69 million in annualized fees and an average 10% annualized yield on deposits offer a clear indication of the ecosystem’s expansion.

Whether SOL can reclaim the $190 level last seen two months ago remains uncertain, and it is unlikely that improved validation software or expanded DApp offerings alone will restore the confidence needed to support a sustainable bullish trend.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as, legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报39m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报39m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News57m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News57m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片