‘Silver and gold have topped’ – Is capital rotating into crypto next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-03Last updated on 2026-01-03

Abstract

Bitcoin has recently underperformed traditional safe-havens like gold and silver, which recently reached all-time highs. Analysts suggested that a metals correction could benefit crypto. Garret Bullish, a prominent trader known as the "White House whale," claimed capital is rotating from metals into cryptocurrencies, citing market movements and his own substantial long positions in BTC, ETH, and SOL. While data shows a short-term shift with rising BTC ETF inflows and declining gold ETF flows, the trend's sustainability remains uncertain. Key events like the Fed rate decision and potential MSCI delisting of BTC treasuries may determine Bitcoin's next price direction.

Bitcoin [BTC] has lagged behind metals or perceived traditional safe-haven assets like gold and silver. The recent explosive silver rally to a new all-time high (ATH) of $83 was marked by an extended price range for BTC below $90K.

Analysts had previously stated that the metals surge was capping BTC’s rebound, and a correction could offer relief for the cryptocurrency.

The White House whale, also known as Garret Bullish, has been the most bullish analyst on crypto, citing potential correction on silver and gold.

Now that metals have given back their recent gains, Garret projected that silver and gold had topped out, and capital was moving to crypto.

“At today’s market open, capital has already started rotating into crypto. Even with equities selling off after the open, crypto kept pushing higher.”

He added that a Bitcoin short-squeeze could drive crypto prices without a pullback.

Whale bets big on crypto rebound

For the unfamiliar, Garret Bullish is the White House whale who made a $160 million profit by shorting BTC before Donald Trump’s China tariff in October.

Some claimed he was an insider who traded on policy moves before they were made public.

In fact, in his latest projection, he was putting the money on the line too. Arkham data showed that he controls $10 billion and is up $70 million on the long positions opened across BTC, Ethereum [ETH], and Solana [SOL].

His largest position was ETH with a whopping $634 million and was almost at break-even at the current ETH level of $3K.

In fact, in a similar silver and gold correction in October, BTC rallied 7%. Given Garrett’s access to information on the policy front, his analyses are always hard to ignore.

Will capital rotation extend?

That said, correlation doesn’t necessarily mean causation. Yes, it was true that there was a slight uptick in BTC ETF inflows ($458 million demand in the week of Dec. 28-Jan. 2).

Over the same period, gold ETF inflows continued to ease further. So, there was indeed a slight capital rotation from gold to BTC, as Garrett stated.

However, both assets have experienced a consistent decline in inflows since November.

Additionally, a week was a limited period to conclusively determine whether the trend would persist and lift BTC and the rest of the crypto market. At press time, BTC traded at $89.9K, up 2% in 2026.

Perhaps the potential MSCI delisting of BTC treasuries and the Fed rate decision, scheduled for 15th and 28th of January, respectively, will trigger the next direction of BTC.


Final Thoughts

  • White House insider projected that the crypto market could rally as silver and gold retreated
  • Despite the bullish outlook, the upcoming MSCI index decision and the Fed could affect the market

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what did analysts suggest was capping Bitcoin's rebound before the recent metals correction?

AAnalysts suggested that the surge in metals like gold and silver was capping Bitcoin's rebound.

QWho is Garret Bullish, and why is his analysis considered significant in the crypto market?

AGarret Bullish, also known as the White House whale, is a prominent analyst who made a $160 million profit by shorting BTC before a major policy move. His analysis is considered significant due to his alleged insider access to policy information and his large capital influence.

QWhat evidence does the article provide to support the claim that capital is rotating from gold to Bitcoin?

AThe article cites a slight uptick in Bitcoin ETF inflows ($458 million demand in the week of Dec. 28-Jan. 2) while gold ETF inflows continued to ease further during the same period.

QWhat are the two major events in January that the article mentions could trigger the next direction for Bitcoin's price?

AThe potential MSCI delisting of BTC treasuries (scheduled for January 15th) and the Fed rate decision (scheduled for January 28th).

QWhat was Garret Bullish's largest cryptocurrency position, and what was its approximate value?

AGarret Bullish's largest position was in Ethereum (ETH), with a value of approximately $634 million.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit2m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit2m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit17m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit17m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

969 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片