Ripple wins U.S. trust bank charter as Garlinghouse hits back at banking lobby

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-12Last updated on 2025-12-12

Abstract

Ripple has received conditional approval from the OCC to form Ripple National Trust Bank, marking a major U.S. regulatory breakthrough for a crypto-native company. This charter, part of a broader approval for five digital-asset firms, allows Ripple to operate within the federal banking system, reducing barriers to institutional partnerships. CEO Brad Garlinghouse criticized traditional banking lobby efforts to delay crypto integration, emphasizing compliance under OCC supervision. Ripple’s stablecoin, RLUSD, will now operate under dual OCC and NYDFS oversight, positioning it among the most regulated stablecoins and enabling competition with USDC and PYUSD. The approvals signal a federal shift toward integrating blockchain infrastructure into traditional finance.

Ripple has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency [OCC] to form Ripple National Trust Bank. This marks one of the most significant regulatory breakthroughs for a crypto-native company in the United States.

The approval, announced on 12 December, is part of a broader OCC release confirming five new national trust bank charters for digital-asset firms.

In a statement accompanying the approvals, Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould said,

“New entrants into the federal banking sector are good for consumers, the banking industry and the economy... The OCC will continue to provide a path for both traditional and innovative approaches to financial services to ensure the federal banking system keeps pace with the evolution of finance.”

Ripple now joins BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos as newly chartered national trust banks.

However, Ripple stands out due to its expanding stablecoin business and the regulatory implications for RLUSD.

Ripple’s Garlinghouse fires back at banking lobby

Reacting to the approval, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse took aim at traditional banking interests. He stated that they had sought to delay the integration of crypto into regulated finance.

“You’ve complained that crypto isn’t playing by the same rules, but here’s the crypto industry — directly under the OCC’s supervision and standards,”

Garlinghouse wrote. “What are you so afraid of?”

The response underscores the broader tension between incumbent institutions and blockchain firms seeking regulatory parity.

With this charter, Ripple gains a formal entry point into the U.S. banking system. Also, it reduces a persistent barrier to institutional partnerships and payments licensing.

What this means for RLUSD

Ripple’s stablecoin, RLUSD, now becomes the first major U.S. tokenized dollar to operate under dual oversight:

  • OCC supervision through Ripple National Trust Bank
  • NYDFS standards through Ripple’s existing compliance obligations

This framework positions RLUSD alongside the highest-regulated stablecoins in the market. Also, it enables Ripple to challenge leaders such as USDC and PYUSD.

Current CoinMarketCap data shows RLUSD maintaining a tight peg at $0.9999, supported by a circulating supply of 1.02 billion tokens.

While intraday volatility produces occasional spikes and dips, peg stability remains intact.

The new bank charter may allow Ripple to offer improved issuance controls, reserve transparency, and settlement guarantees, potentially accelerating RLUSD adoption in U.S. markets where regulatory clarity has been a sticking point.

A turning point for crypto banking in the U.S.

The OCC’s simultaneous approval of five digital-asset trust banks signals a notable shift in the federal approach to crypto supervision.

By bringing stablecoin issuers and custody platforms into the national banking perimeter, regulators appear more willing to integrate blockchain infrastructure rather than isolate it.

Also, for Ripple, the move provides a direct path into U.S. financial services — something years of regulatory battles had stalled.

Additionally, for the crypto industry, it represents one of the clearest signs yet that federal regulators are preparing for an economy where tokenized assets and stablecoins operate alongside traditional banking products.


Final Thoughts

  • Ripple’s new charter brings RLUSD under one of the strongest regulatory frameworks in the stablecoin market, setting a precedent competitors may be forced to follow.
  • The OCC’s approvals highlight a maturing federal stance on digital assets, positioning blockchain firms to operate inside, not outside, the U.S. banking system.

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalised services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalisation of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualisation of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasises these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalised Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

152 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.06Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片