Pump.fun-Linked Wallet Sends $148M Stablecoins to Kraken Again

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-13Last updated on 2026-01-13

Abstract

An on-chain analyst reported that a wallet linked to Pump.fun transferred approximately $148 million in USDC and USDT to Kraken, continuing a pattern of large transfers observed over the past two months. These funds originated from Pump.fun's mid-2025 token sale. Since November 15, a total of $753 million in stablecoins from the PUMP ICO proceeds has been moved to Kraken. Pump.fun has previously stated these are routine treasury operations for diversification and reinvestment, not liquidations. The latest transfer occurs amid increased scrutiny of the platform's fee structure and slowing revenue growth. Neither Pump.fun nor Kraken has publicly commented.

EmberCN, an on-chain analyst, revealed today that a wallet linked with Pump.fun has deposited around $148 million in stablecoins to Kraken. This transaction sees a continuing pattern of huge exchange-bound transfers seen in the last two months.

The data also reveals that the recent deposit included USDC and USDT shifted to Kraken in a short time span. It is noteworthy that the funds were initiated from wallets associated with the Pump.fun’s token sale occurred in mid-2025.

After this transfer, the total amount sent to Kraken since Nov. 15 is around $753 million in stablecoins. All the funds find their origin in proceeds from the PUMP initial coin offering, based on publicly visible wallet activity.

The same movements have been witnessed at regular intervals since late 2025, mostly consisting of nine-figure sums. Sometimes, stablecoins deposited to Kraken were then observed titting toward Circle-associated addresses, indicating probable redemptions or internal treasury operations.

No Public Comments Have Been Made

Both Pump.fun and Kraken have chosen not to comment publicly on the matter of the recent transfer. The pace and consistency of these deposits have captivated the attention of crypto markets, mainly Pump.fun’s crucial role in the memecoin economy of Solana.

Before this, Pump.fun has opposed claims that these transfers show cash-outs or liquidation activity. Team members have reported that past movements are routine treasury management, adding diversification, operational spending and preparation for reinvestment.

Still, the timing has ignited debate once again. The most recent transfer has come at a time of increased scrutiny of the platform, including complaints regarding its last creator fee structure and reduced revenue growth as contrasted to periods of peak memecoin trading.

The co-founder of the firm, Alon Cohen, accepted the flaws in the last fee model earlier this month. He gave out a new strategy that would move incentives away from volume-influenced token launches and toward traders and liquidity.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

UK Lawmakers Push to Ban Crypto Donations Over Transparency and Foreign Influence Risks

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist13m ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist13m ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit25m ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit25m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit38m ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit38m ago

Weekly Token Unlock: XPL to Release Millions in Token Value

Weekly Token Unlocks: XPL and SoSoValue Tokens Worth Over $10 Million Set for Release This week sees significant token unlocks for two projects. SoSoValue, an AI-powered crypto investment research platform, will unlock 13.03 million tokens, valued at approximately $3.87 million. The project aims to merge CeFi efficiency with DeFi transparency. Separately, Plasma, a Layer 1 blockchain designed for global stablecoin payments, will unlock 110 million tokens worth about $10.42 million. The network focuses on high throughput, stablecoin-native features, and full EVM compatibility. Both projects have provided their detailed token release schedules.

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Token Unlock: XPL to Release Millions in Token Value

marsbit1h ago

Bitcoin Must Hold $60K Or Risk Major Breakdown, TradingView Analyst Warns

Bitcoin has reached a critical juncture around the $60,000 level, which analysts view as a major technical and psychological support zone. According to a TradingView analysis, a successful hold above this demand area could pave the way for a recovery toward $81,000. However, the warning is clear: a decisive and sustained break below $60,000 would invalidate the bullish outlook, likely triggering stop losses and a deeper market correction. The current setup is described as a binary test—maintaining support keeps the recovery narrative alive, while losing it would signal a shift toward a more significant downturn.

bitcoinist2h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures