Pump.fun Launches Trader Cashbacks in Fee Model Shift

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-18Last updated on 2026-02-18

Abstract

Solana-based memecoin launchpad Pump.fun has introduced a new Trader Cashback system, shifting its fee model. Token creators must now choose between the traditional Creator Fees or the new cashback option before launch, a decision that is irreversible. Under the cashback model, traders earn automatic rewards on every trade made through Pump.fun's Terminal interface, aiming to better distribute incentives and reward active market participants rather than just deployers. This change comes as the platform experiences a significant revenue decline, with fees dropping 75.6% in January from its peak. On-chain data highlights a profitability disparity, as only a small fraction of the millions of interacting wallets have earned substantial profits. The community reaction is mixed; some welcome the trader-focused incentives, while others worry it may reduce developer promotion post-launch. This move reflects a broader industry trend of platforms testing new incentive models to boost participation and confidence in the volatile memecoin market.

Solana-based memecoin launchpad Pump.fun has introduced a new trader-focused rewards system that reshapes its fee model. The platform now allows token creators to choose between traditional Creator Fees or a new Trader Cashback structure before launching a coin. Once selected, creators cannot reverse the decision.

Pump.fun originally rewarded token deployers with 0.3% of all fees generated by their coins. That model fueled rapid growth and helped the platform generate more than $15 million in daily fees at its peak. However, critics argued that the system favored deployers while most retail traders absorbed losses.

Trader Cashback Model Takes Center Stage

Under the new framework, creators must decide whether their token qualifies for Creator Fees or should operate as a “Cashback Coin.” If creators select the Trader Cashback option, traders earn rewards on every trade executed through Terminal, Pump.fun’s built-in trading interface.

Terminal generates cashback rewards automatically and makes them accessible within the platform. According to Pump.fun, this change brings about a more balanced distribution of incentives, particularly for successful tokens that do not have organized teams or development plans.

The company noted that many viral memecoins gain traction organically. In this regard, the Creator Fees might end up favoring the deployers who do not contribute much to the process. The new system tries to shift the incentives to the people who are actively participating in the market.

Platform Revenue Faces Sharp Decline

The new system is being introduced at a time when the platform revenue is experiencing a drastic drop. Pump.fun has seen a 75.6% drop in its fees to $31.8 million in January, compared to the $148.1 million it saw in January 2025, which is its best month so far. February has brought in $15.6 million so far, putting the platform on track to underperform January’s total.

On-chain data reveals another challenge. Dune Analytics shows that out of 58.7 million wallets that interacted with Pump.fun, only 4.76 million wallets earned between $1,000 and $10,000. Fewer than 13,700 wallets reached millionaire status. The information points to the disparity between viral token launches and the profitability of traders.

Santiment analysts have recently indicated that memecoins could be close to a possible market bottom. You can follow memecoin market trends and on-chain data using tools such as CoinMarketCap and follow Solana ecosystem data using Solscan.

Community Reaction and Industry Context

The community responded positively to the news, although some users questioned the long-term implications of the change. Some critics believe that lowering Creator Fees could lead to a decrease in the number of developers who promote tokens following a launch. This is because developers currently use early trading volume as a reward, and this change could affect that.

However, other platforms have made different decisions. Coinbase’s Base has decided to end its Creator Rewards program in favor of tradable assets. The program rewarded about 17,000 creators with a total of $450,000 over a period of seven months.

The adjustment signal by Pump.fun indicates a larger trend in the economics of memecoins. The platforms are now testing different models of incentives as trading volumes become volatile and retail participation slows down. By putting traders front and center in the incentive scheme, Pump.fun aims to regain confidence and drive participation.

The memecoin market is driven by speculation and social momentum. For healthy growth, there has to be a balance in incentives. The cashback system of Pump.fun is testing the hypothesis of whether reward redistribution can help stabilize participation.

Highlighted Crypto News:

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) Posts 18% Surge: Are Buyers Taking the Driver’s Seat?

Tagscrypto tradingDeFimemecoinsPump.funSolana

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the key change Pump.fun has made to its fee model?

APump.fun has introduced a new Trader Cashback system, allowing token creators to choose between the traditional Creator Fees or the new cashback structure for traders before launching a coin.

QWhat was the primary criticism of the original Pump.fun fee model?

ACritics argued that the original model, which rewarded token deployers with 0.3% of all fees, favored deployers while most retail traders absorbed the losses.

QHow does the new Trader Cashback system work?

AIf a creator selects the Trader Cashback option, traders earn rewards on every trade executed through Pump.fun's built-in trading interface, Terminal, which generates and makes the cashback accessible within the platform.

QWhat significant challenge is Pump.fun facing alongside this model change?

AThe platform is experiencing a sharp decline in revenue, with a 75.6% drop in fees to $31.8 million in January compared to its peak of $148.1 million, and February is on track to underperform January.

QWhat is one potential negative consequence of lowering Creator Fees, as mentioned by some critics?

ASome critics believe that lowering Creator Fees could lead to a decrease in the number of developers who promote tokens after launch, as they currently use early trading volume as a reward.

Related Reads

Crypto Miners' Big AI Gamble: Valuations Enter Differentiation Stage, Comeback Fight Proves Tough

Crypto Mining Firms' AI Bet: Valuation Divergence and a Challenging Transformation Facing declining profitability in crypto mining, mining companies are pivoting to AI infrastructure, capitalizing on their existing power resources, land, and data center expertise to offer GPU compute power. This transition narrative has boosted their stock prices significantly, with firms like Hut 8 and Bitfarms seeing gains over 100% year-to-date, far outpacing Bitcoin. This has led to a market valuation split, with pioneers like CoreWeave reaching a $62.8B market cap, while others remain below $5B. The market currently prioritizes growth potential over short-term profits, which remain under pressure due to heavy capital expenditures for AI build-outs and crypto asset volatility. However, the transformation is a high-stakes gamble. Bitcoin mining profitability is shrinking, with the average production cost around $63,707 and miner margins contracting. While AI offers a more lucrative long-term path, it requires massive investment—estimated at a $500B near-term funding gap. Success now hinges on execution: delivering on contracted power capacity, securing quality tenants like major cloud providers, and managing the immense financial burden. The valuation focus is shifting from mere power capacity to project delivery, future cash flows, and tenant quality, making this a difficult but critical turnaround attempt.

链捕手3m ago

Crypto Miners' Big AI Gamble: Valuations Enter Differentiation Stage, Comeback Fight Proves Tough

链捕手3m ago

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

AI investor Leopold Aschenbrenner has made a significant portfolio shift, taking a $9 billion nominal short position against top AI infrastructure stocks like NVIDIA, ASML, and Oracle. Simultaneously, he is redirecting capital towards what he sees as the next critical bottlenecks in the AI boom: power, memory, and data center networking, alongside private investments in AI model companies like Anthropic. This move is interpreted not as a call that the AI bubble has burst, but as a rotation within the infrastructure stack. The analysis highlights NVIDIA's recent $25 billion bond issuance as a potential signal, questioning why a cash-rich company would seek external debt despite high profits and increased dividends/buybacks. The core investment thesis is that the initial, crowded "picks and shovels" trade in semiconductors is maturing. The next wave of capital is expected to flow into the physical and logistical constraints of AI expansion: electricity supply, memory chip capacity, data center construction, and enabling technologies like optical networking (fiber) for high-bandwidth communication, where copper remains crucial for short distances. Aschenbrenner's substantial (approx. 20% of fund) private stake in Anthropic is noted as a key part of his strategy—investing directly in the "mine" (AI models) rather than just the "shovels." The discussion concludes that while certain segments may be overvalued, the overarching AI infrastructure demand driven by real product usage remains robust. The most promising long-term investments are seen in essential, non-sexy infrastructure—particularly energy and power companies—whose demand is viewed as a global constant irrespective of AI's cyclicality.

marsbit24m ago

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

marsbit24m ago

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit53m ago

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit53m ago

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit1h ago

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片