Pump.fun Launches Trader Cashbacks in Fee Model Shift

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-18Last updated on 2026-02-18

Abstract

Solana-based memecoin launchpad Pump.fun has introduced a new Trader Cashback system, shifting its fee model. Token creators must now choose between the traditional Creator Fees or the new cashback option before launch, a decision that is irreversible. Under the cashback model, traders earn automatic rewards on every trade made through Pump.fun's Terminal interface, aiming to better distribute incentives and reward active market participants rather than just deployers. This change comes as the platform experiences a significant revenue decline, with fees dropping 75.6% in January from its peak. On-chain data highlights a profitability disparity, as only a small fraction of the millions of interacting wallets have earned substantial profits. The community reaction is mixed; some welcome the trader-focused incentives, while others worry it may reduce developer promotion post-launch. This move reflects a broader industry trend of platforms testing new incentive models to boost participation and confidence in the volatile memecoin market.

Solana-based memecoin launchpad Pump.fun has introduced a new trader-focused rewards system that reshapes its fee model. The platform now allows token creators to choose between traditional Creator Fees or a new Trader Cashback structure before launching a coin. Once selected, creators cannot reverse the decision.

Pump.fun originally rewarded token deployers with 0.3% of all fees generated by their coins. That model fueled rapid growth and helped the platform generate more than $15 million in daily fees at its peak. However, critics argued that the system favored deployers while most retail traders absorbed losses.

Trader Cashback Model Takes Center Stage

Under the new framework, creators must decide whether their token qualifies for Creator Fees or should operate as a “Cashback Coin.” If creators select the Trader Cashback option, traders earn rewards on every trade executed through Terminal, Pump.fun’s built-in trading interface.

Terminal generates cashback rewards automatically and makes them accessible within the platform. According to Pump.fun, this change brings about a more balanced distribution of incentives, particularly for successful tokens that do not have organized teams or development plans.

The company noted that many viral memecoins gain traction organically. In this regard, the Creator Fees might end up favoring the deployers who do not contribute much to the process. The new system tries to shift the incentives to the people who are actively participating in the market.

Platform Revenue Faces Sharp Decline

The new system is being introduced at a time when the platform revenue is experiencing a drastic drop. Pump.fun has seen a 75.6% drop in its fees to $31.8 million in January, compared to the $148.1 million it saw in January 2025, which is its best month so far. February has brought in $15.6 million so far, putting the platform on track to underperform January’s total.

On-chain data reveals another challenge. Dune Analytics shows that out of 58.7 million wallets that interacted with Pump.fun, only 4.76 million wallets earned between $1,000 and $10,000. Fewer than 13,700 wallets reached millionaire status. The information points to the disparity between viral token launches and the profitability of traders.

Santiment analysts have recently indicated that memecoins could be close to a possible market bottom. You can follow memecoin market trends and on-chain data using tools such as CoinMarketCap and follow Solana ecosystem data using Solscan.

Community Reaction and Industry Context

The community responded positively to the news, although some users questioned the long-term implications of the change. Some critics believe that lowering Creator Fees could lead to a decrease in the number of developers who promote tokens following a launch. This is because developers currently use early trading volume as a reward, and this change could affect that.

However, other platforms have made different decisions. Coinbase’s Base has decided to end its Creator Rewards program in favor of tradable assets. The program rewarded about 17,000 creators with a total of $450,000 over a period of seven months.

The adjustment signal by Pump.fun indicates a larger trend in the economics of memecoins. The platforms are now testing different models of incentives as trading volumes become volatile and retail participation slows down. By putting traders front and center in the incentive scheme, Pump.fun aims to regain confidence and drive participation.

The memecoin market is driven by speculation and social momentum. For healthy growth, there has to be a balance in incentives. The cashback system of Pump.fun is testing the hypothesis of whether reward redistribution can help stabilize participation.

Highlighted Crypto News:

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) Posts 18% Surge: Are Buyers Taking the Driver’s Seat?

Tagscrypto tradingDeFimemecoinsPump.funSolana

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the key change Pump.fun has made to its fee model?

APump.fun has introduced a new Trader Cashback system, allowing token creators to choose between the traditional Creator Fees or the new cashback structure for traders before launching a coin.

QWhat was the primary criticism of the original Pump.fun fee model?

ACritics argued that the original model, which rewarded token deployers with 0.3% of all fees, favored deployers while most retail traders absorbed the losses.

QHow does the new Trader Cashback system work?

AIf a creator selects the Trader Cashback option, traders earn rewards on every trade executed through Pump.fun's built-in trading interface, Terminal, which generates and makes the cashback accessible within the platform.

QWhat significant challenge is Pump.fun facing alongside this model change?

AThe platform is experiencing a sharp decline in revenue, with a 75.6% drop in fees to $31.8 million in January compared to its peak of $148.1 million, and February is on track to underperform January.

QWhat is one potential negative consequence of lowering Creator Fees, as mentioned by some critics?

ASome critics believe that lowering Creator Fees could lead to a decrease in the number of developers who promote tokens after launch, as they currently use early trading volume as a reward.

Related Reads

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit1h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit1h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit1h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit1h ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手1h ago

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片