Polish Parliament Slams The Brakes On Crypto Market Act After Controversial Revival

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-12-20Last updated on 2025-12-20

Abstract

Polish lawmakers have halted discussions on the controversial Crypto-Asset Market Act until January. The lower house, the Sejm, recently passed a nearly identical version of a bill previously vetoed by President Karol Nawrocki, who expressed concerns about overregulation, threats to innovation, and potential startup exodus. Despite failing to override the veto, the ruling coalition reintroduced the bill with minimal changes, including a reduced fee for crypto intermediaries from 0.4% to 0.1%. The Senate has delayed its decision to carefully review the amendments, with further discussions scheduled for January.

Polish lawmakers have reportedly halted discussions on crypto legislations until January after the parliament’s lower house, the Sejm, voted to pass a nearly identical version of a bill that was vetoed by Poland’s president earlier this month without changes.

Poland’s Sejm Passes Controversial Crypto Bill

On Friday, local news media outlets informed that the Polish Senate hit the brakes on the controversial Crypto-Asset Market Act, following the Sejm’s recent vote to pass “version 2.0” of the legislation.

According to the reports, more than half of the members of the lower chamber voted to pass the revived version of the bill on Thursday, leaving its fate in the hands of the Senate and then the President, who has strongly opposed to the legislation.

As reported by Bitcoinist, Poland’s President Karol Nawrocki vetoed the Crypto-Asset Market Act at the start of the month due to concerns of a potential exodus of startups and overregulating the sector with the “legal mess” proposed by the Polish government.

On December 1, President Nawrocki refused to sign the bill, first introduced in June, which aimed to establish strict rules on the crypto assets market. He argued that the legislation it could pose a real threat to the freedoms of Poles, the stability of the state, and market innovation.

The local crypto community had raised concerns about the bill in September, affirming that it exceeded the European Union (EU)’s minimum regulatory requirements and could drive small businesses and startups abroad.

The parliament attempted to override the President’s veto, but ultimately failed after being unable to secure the required three-fifths majority vote to overturn the presidential decision.

Nonetheless, the part of the ruling coalition in the Sejm reintroduced the bill a week later without allegedly amending any of the controversial policies, raising more concerns among crypto industry players and community members.

Senate Delays Decision Until January

According to the reports, the Senate had initially planned to pass the bill “at an express pace” before the end of the year. However, the Deputy Finance Minister Jurand Drop raised concerns about the intention to pass the legislation with no further revisions.

Deputy Minister Drop pointed out that the Sejm had introduced only one change to the proposal, a lower fee for entities intermediating in crypto trading, despite the government’s disapproval of the current text.

“This amendment, which was introduced during the Sejm vote and which the government disagrees with, concerns the level of fees paid to the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) by entities in the crypto-asset market. The fee has been reduced from 0.4% to 0.1%,” Drop explained.

“Other market segments have fees of a maximum of 0.5%; for this market, the government has proposed 0.4%. Although the KNF’s projections indicate that these fees will not exceed 0.1%, and in the first year, they will not be collected at all, the question remains what will happen if this market grows and, as a result, the fees are forced to exceed 0.1%,” he added.

On Friday morning, the Senate Budget and Public Finance Committee discussed the recently passed bill and the Ministry of Finance’s concerns. The committee chairman, Senator Kazimierz Kleina, suggested that the committee review this modification calmly.

Therefore, he withdrew the motion to pass the bill without new changes and suspended the discussions on the bill, affirming that the Sejm’s amendments “will have to be carefully considered.” Ultimately, Chairman Kleina scheduled to resume work on the legislation during the January Senate session.

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $87,752 in the one-week, chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Related Questions

QWhy did the Polish Sejm halt discussions on crypto legislation until January?

AThe Sejm halted discussions after passing a nearly identical version of a previously vetoed crypto bill, and the Senate decided to delay further review until January to carefully consider the amendments.

QWhat was the main reason President Karol Nawrocki vetoed the Crypto-Asset Market Act initially?

APresident Nawrocki vetoed the bill due to concerns about potential startup exodus, overregulation, and the threat it posed to Poles' freedoms, state stability, and market innovation.

QHow did the Sejm's revived version of the crypto bill change the fee structure?

AThe Sejm reduced the fee paid to the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) by crypto entities from 0.4% to 0.1%.

QWhat concerns did Deputy Finance Minister Jurand Drop raise about the revised bill?

ADrop expressed concerns about the reduced fee (0.1%) and questioned what would happen if the market grew, potentially requiring fees to exceed that level, as other market segments have fees up to 0.5%.

QWhy did the local crypto community oppose the Crypto-Asset Market Act?

AThe community argued that the bill exceeded the EU's minimum regulatory requirements and could drive small businesses and startups abroad due to overregulation.

Related Reads

Founder of Baixing.com: The Notion That Large Language Models Will Devour Everything, I Believe Half of It

Founder of Baixing.com: I Only Half-Believe the Saying “Large Language Models Will Devour Everything” Author: Wang Jianshuo, Founder of Baixing.com Many proclaim that large models are everything, but the author is skeptical. He argues that such sweeping claims often stem from a limited understanding of the future. Drawing parallels to past technologies like electricity and the internet—which were predicted to “devour everything” but didn’t—he suggests that large language models (LLMs) are better seen as a foundational base. Like electricity, this base is essential for modern development, but its real value emerges only when applied to specific scenarios through various “machines” or “tools” (e.g., Claude Code for programming, Claude Design for design). The author acknowledges that LLMs may indeed replace many existing software systems built on rigid rules, workflows, and forms (e.g., CRMs, SaaS tools), as these are precisely what LLMs excel at processing. However, he emphasizes that beyond software, elements like customer data, execution capabilities (e.g., booking a flight), trust, and physical-world interactions will not be “devoured.” Instead, he foresees that after streamlining existing software, LLMs will open up a larger space for innovative, next-generation applications. These new tools will likely feature fluid interfaces and rely less on fixed rules, unleashing greater creativity. The author cautions against short-sightedness, recalling how in 2004 many believed internet giants like Sina, Sohu, and NetEase would monopolize the market—only to be proven wrong by subsequent disruptions. In conclusion, while LLMs are a crucial foundation and a current focal point, the true mainstream of this wave lies in the diverse applications built atop them to solve concrete problems. The phrase “devour everything” is imprecise; the real opportunity lies in identifying and leveraging the areas where LLMs do bring transformative change.

marsbit32m ago

Founder of Baixing.com: The Notion That Large Language Models Will Devour Everything, I Believe Half of It

marsbit32m ago

Founder of Baixing.com: I Only Half Believe in the Notion that Large Language Models Devour Everything

The founder of Baixing Wang states that while large language models (LLMs) are an extremely important foundational technology—akin to electricity or the internet—he only "half believes" the notion that they will "consume everything." He argues that LLMs provide a base layer of intelligence, but real-world value and transformation come from integrating this intelligence into specific applications and devices designed for particular scenarios—like how electricity powers various appliances from washing machines to TVs. He agrees LLMs will likely consume or replace a significant portion of existing rule-based, workflow-driven software (e.g., many SaaS systems, CRMs), as these are precisely what LLMs excel at handling. However, numerous other elements—such as customer data, execution capabilities (e.g., booking a flight), trust, and physical-world interactions—will not be consumed. Wang emphasizes that after LLMs absorb certain software layers, they will open up a much larger space for innovation: new types of "streaming" software with less rigid interfaces, where fixed rules are managed by AI. This next wave of applications built on top of the stable LLM foundation is where the true mainstream opportunity lies. He cautions against the short-sightedness of declaring any technology as all-consuming, drawing parallels to past premature predictions about internet giants monopolizing the web. The key is to find opportunities within the areas LLMs do transform.

链捕手37m ago

Founder of Baixing.com: I Only Half Believe in the Notion that Large Language Models Devour Everything

链捕手37m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片