North Korea steals $2.8B in 2 years – Here’s what U.S. Treasury wants to do

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-09Last updated on 2026-03-09

Abstract

The U.S. Treasury is intensifying efforts to combat illicit financial activities involving digital assets, as highlighted in a report under the GENIUS Act. The study identifies significant risks, particularly with stablecoins, which accounted for 84% of illicit crypto transactions in 2025. The Treasury recommends enhanced monitoring using AI and real-time blockchain analytics, and proposes treating major stablecoin issuers like regulated financial institutions. The report also underscores growing threats from state-backed actors, notably North Korea, which stole an estimated $2.8 billion in crypto over two years to fund weapons programs. These findings support legislative push for acts like the CLARITY Act to establish clearer regulatory frameworks for digital assets.

As digital asset adoption grows, regulators are increasing efforts to prevent illicit financial activity, and in this U.S. Treasury has made a bold move.

Under the GENIUS Act, the U.S. Treasury was tasked with studying tools to detect illicit activity involving digital assets. As a part of the process, the Treasury reviewed industry feedback and examined technologies such as AI, digital identity, blockchain analytics, and APIs.

In this, they also found the risks linked to digital assets. These included the misuse of mixers, distributed ledgers, and DeFi, while outlining measures to combat illicit crypto finance.

Stablecoins take centre stage from a regulatory point of view

Seeing such setbacks, the report calls for stronger monitoring of the crypto ecosystem, particularly stablecoins. Treasury data shows stablecoins accounted for about 84% of illicit crypto transaction volume in 2025, making them a key focus for regulators.

To address this risk, the Treasury proposes AI-powered monitoring tools and real-time blockchain analytics to track transactions involving unhosted wallets and decentralized platforms.

Under this framework, major stablecoin issuers could be treated more like regulated financial institutions with stricter compliance requirements.

Remarking on the same, Galaxy Research Head Alex Thorn also weighed in,

Rising criminal and state-backed threats

Beyond regulation, the report also highlighted the growing scale of cybercrime and state-backed activity in the crypto sector.

One major concern came from North Korea, which emerged as one of the most aggressive cyber actors targeting the industry.

Using advanced hacking and social engineering tactics, North Korean groups stole $1.5 billion in crypto in early 2025, bringing their estimated total to $2.8 billion over the past two years, reportedly used to fund weapons programs.

At the same time, online scams are also expanding rapidly.

This highlights how the Treasury’s findings are closely tied to the proposed CLARITY Act, which aims to create clearer regulatory rules for digital assets rather than forcing crypto into traditional banking frameworks.

The need for tighter oversight

Additionally, the 2026 Chainalysis report recently highlighted how sanctioned entities moved around $104 billion through cryptocurrency in 2025, representing a massive 694% increase from the previous year.

Together, these findings deepen the Treasury’s concerns and may push lawmakers toward advancing legislation like the CLARITY Act.


Final Summary

  • With stablecoins linked to a large share of illicit transactions, regulators are prioritizing stricter oversight of issuers and transaction flows.
  • North Korean hacks, global scams, and sanctions evasion highlight how crypto is increasingly tied to international security concerns.

Related Reads

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit1h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit1h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit1h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片