New Protocol Tacit: The ZEC of the Bitcoin Ecosystem

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-14Last updated on 2026-05-14

Abstract

The article discusses Tacit, a new privacy-focused Bitcoin asset protocol emerging after a period of relative quiet in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Unlike BRC-20 or Runes, Tacit is a "meta-protocol" where the indexer runs directly in the user's browser, removing the need for centralized servers. Its key innovation is enabling privacy for token amounts on the Bitcoin mainnet. Tacit employs cryptographic techniques like Pedersen Commitments and Bulletproofs to conceal transaction amounts while proving conservation of funds. It uses Mimblewimble-style signatures to prevent inflation and ECDH encryption to ensure only senders and receivers can decrypt real amounts. This makes it a native "privacy coin" for Bitcoin, albeit one that hides amounts but not the direction of fund flows between addresses. The protocol, developed by ross.wei (known for Ethereum's ZAMM), has rapidly evolved since its May 7 launch. It now supports fair launches, a marketplace, token swaps, and a novel mixer similar to Tornado Cash but without relying on smart contracts. However, this privacy comes at a cost, with transaction fees estimated to be about 10 times higher than Runes. Future plans include privacy-wrapping native Bitcoin (cBTC), implementing silent receipts, and hiding the token type in transfers. The main token, $TAC, has gained traction with a market cap around $4 million. Positioned between simpler token standards and complex solutions like RGB, Tacit represents a significant and innovative step ...

The Bitcoin ecosystem had been forgotten for a long time. Especially after Magic Eden, once the largest Bitcoin ecosystem marketplace, stopped supporting the Bitcoin ecosystem and discontinued its Magic Eden Wallet service, it gave players who hadn't paid attention to the Bitcoin ecosystem for a while a feeling that "the Bitcoin ecosystem is over."

However, not only are veteran Bitcoin infrastructure projects like UniSat and Xverse still working hard, but after Magic Eden, marketplaces like SatFlow and ord.net have also filled the gap. Recently, the emergence of a new Bitcoin asset protocol has brought the Bitcoin ecosystem back into the spotlight.

This new protocol is called Tacit.

What is Tacit?

First, we need to classify Tacit into the "meta-protocol" category like BRC-20 and Runes, which rely on indexers to handle asset confirmation. If there's any difference, it's that Tacit's indexer runs directly in the user's browser, eliminating the need to trust any centralized server (indexer). As long as two computers run the same code and view the same Bitcoin blockchain data, they will arrive at the same balance results.

Tacit's unique aspect is that it is a new Bitcoin asset protocol focused on "privacy." Many players promoting this new protocol directly use analogies like "ZEC on Bitcoin." This has some merit but isn't entirely accurate, because Tacit's hiding capability only applies to the *amount* of tokens (including the total supply amount specified during new token deployment and the specific amount of each transfer), not to the on-chain address graph.

In other words, Tacit hides the *amount* of fund flow, but not the *direction* of fund flow.

Nevertheless, it is still a native privacy asset protocol on the Bitcoin mainnet. Let's use a simple analogy to explain how it achieves this on the Bitcoin mainnet.

An ordinary Bitcoin transaction is like a transparent ledger; everyone can see a transaction and how much money is involved. Tacit, on the other hand, is like putting the transaction into a "black box" (a Pedersen commitment).

People can still see that this transaction occurred. Although they cannot see the amount, you can prove to everyone that "the money I put in plus the money I take out balances the books."

Pedersen commitments and Bulletproofs are used to hide the transaction amount while proving to the entire network that you haven't fabricated tokens out of thin air (e.g., proving the transferred amount is not negative and the total is conserved).

Mimblewimble-style signatures prove that the outgoing amount equals the incoming amount, ensuring tokens cannot be maliciously inflated.

When the sender transfers tokens to the receiver, the amount information is encrypted using ECDH and written onto the blockchain. Only the sender and receiver can decrypt and see the real amount using their private keys; to others, this data is just gibberish.

Finally, the indexer built into the dApp (the user's browser) reads the data on the Bitcoin chain, independently verifies the aforementioned cryptographic proofs, and thereby calculates your real balance.

Since its launch on May 7th, developer ross.wei (@z0r0zzz) has been updating quickly. Currently, Tacit already supports fair launches, has a marketplace, supports token swaps, and even has a mixer.

This mixer is somewhat similar to Tornado Cash—the more people deposit, the higher the privacy (harder to identify which addresses in the pool correspond). However, Tacit's mixer does not rely on smart contracts. It embeds the deposit proof in the Taproot transaction note, and the zero-knowledge proof for withdrawals is handled by the indexer in the browser.

It's even slightly stronger than Tornado Cash in some aspects because Tornado Cash cannot hide the amount being mixed. However, Tacit's mixer cannot mix native Bitcoin because hiding the mixing amount itself requires first wrapping the Bitcoin.

Of course, privacy comes at a cost. According to the GitHub documentation, due to the larger witness data required for hiding, the transfer cost corresponds to a mainnet fee rate of approximately 10 sat/vB, meaning each transfer costs about 25,000-30,000 sat, roughly 10 times the cost of a Runes transfer.

Who Built Tacit?

Developer ross.wei (@z0r0zzz) is a relatively well-known developer in the Ethereum ecosystem. He previously developed ZAMM, which uses a single contract for creating new tokens, managing LPs, farming, and swaps, significantly improving gas efficiency and user experience.

$ZAMM was also a notable project on Ethereum in the past, reaching a market cap in the tens of millions of dollars and receiving a retweet from crypto KOL Ansem.

Tacit isn't something he suddenly created on a whim; he has been interested in Bitcoin technology for a while. This new protocol has also garnered attention from Messari Enterprise Research Manager @AvgJoesCrypto.

In the future, the author also plans to implement privacy-wrapped native Bitcoin (cBTC), silent receiving (generating a new one-time address for each receiving transaction), and hiding the type of currency being transferred.

Relevant Assets

Currently, the token with the highest trading volume is $TAC. This token was deployed by the protocol author himself and was airdropped not long ago based on holdings of the $ZORG staking token from the Ethereum-based $ZAMM. Its current market cap is approximately $4 million, making it the undisputed leader.

The first token launched via fair launch is $FAIR, though trading for this token is not yet available on the marketplace.

Conclusion

This is indeed an innovative Bitcoin asset protocol. Compared to BRC-20 and Runes, it has already implemented amount privacy and plans to achieve more. Compared to RGB, Taproot Assets, and Liquid CT, it doesn't rely on off-chain client-side proofs or exist as a sidechain; it operates entirely using on-chain data.

After repurposing its own protocol components to create a mixer, it has also addressed the hiding of the on-chain address graph.

Although the usage cost is relatively high, this is truly a refreshing and eye-catching innovation not seen in the Bitcoin ecosystem for a long time.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main characteristic that differentiates the new Bitcoin asset protocol Tacit from protocols like BRC-20 and Runes?

ATacit is a privacy-focused Bitcoin asset protocol. Its primary differentiating characteristic is that it can hide the amount of tokens in transactions (including the total supply defined at deployment and the specific amount in each transfer), while protocols like BRC-20 and Runes have transparent ledgers. However, Tacit does not hide the direction of fund flows (i.e., the address graph).

QHow does Tacit achieve transaction amount privacy on the Bitcoin mainnet according to the article?

ATacit uses a combination of cryptographic techniques: Pedersen commitments and Bulletproofs to hide the transaction amount while proving to the network that no tokens are fraudulently created (e.g., proving amounts are non-negative and conserved). Mimblewimble-style signatures prove that the output amount equals the input amount, preventing malicious inflation. The actual amount information is encrypted using ECDH and written on-chain, decryptable only by the sender and receiver with their private keys.

QWho is the developer behind the Tacit protocol, and what is their background mentioned in the article?

AThe developer behind Tacit is ross.wei (@z0r0zzz). He is a well-known Ethereum developer who previously created ZAMM, a project that reached a multi-million dollar market cap and gained attention from crypto KOLs like Ansem. His interest in Bitcoin technology led to the development of Tacit.

QWhat is the current primary token associated with the Tacit protocol, and how was it distributed?

AThe primary token is $TAC. It was deployed by the protocol author and recently airdropped to holders of $ZORG, the staking token of the Ethereum-based $ZAMM project. Its current market capitalization is approximately $4 million.

QWhat are some of the planned future features for the Tacit protocol as mentioned in the article?

APlanned future features for Tacit include: privacy encapsulation for native Bitcoin (cBTC), silent receiving (generating a new one-time address for each incoming transaction), and hiding the type of token being transferred.

Related Reads

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit11m ago

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit11m ago

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

"Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: Circulation Shrinks Amid Bearish Sentiment" Amid widespread bearish sentiment, with prominent figures like Bankless founder David Hoffman selling ETH and young developers flocking to Solana, some argue Ethereum is entering its "Ballmer era"—akin to Microsoft's perceived stagnation under Steve Ballmer. While surface-level criticisms about slow protocol development, cautious leadership, and competitive pressure are valid, underlying fundamentals tell a different story. Approximately 30% of ETH is staked, major holders like BitMine are accumulating, and spot ETFs continue to absorb supply. Regulatory clarity, including the SEC/CFTC's March ruling on staking rewards and the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, is transforming crypto from a regulatory threat into a legitimized framework. This institutionalization, alongside a shrinking circulating supply (with net issuance around 0.23% annually), creates significant buy-side pressure independent of fee-based value capture. The broader crypto total addressable market is expanding through regulated stablecoins, tokenized assets, and institutional adoption. While public chains face competition from permissioned alternatives, the winning model appears to be permissioned assets settling on public chains like Ethereum and Solana. The author advocates a non-maximalist, barbell strategy: holding ETH for its institutional role and supply squeeze, SOL for consumer/throughput trends, BTC as a macro hedge, and a basket of next-gen L1s. Key bullish drivers for ETH include rapid circulation shrinkage, potential Q2 staked ETF approvals, regulatory tailwinds solidifying its role as a default settlement layer, and the optionality of an eventual "Satya moment" leadership shift. Despite bearish consensus, the current setup—where crypto is "not hot" and regulatory groundwork is being laid—presents a compelling investment opportunity. The crypto cycle's focus may have shifted to AI, but blockchain infrastructure is gaining a legal and institutional foothold precisely while attention is elsewhere.

marsbit11m ago

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

marsbit11m ago

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

Claude Code introduces dynamic workflows, enabling AI to coordinate teams of specialized agents for complex tasks. This transforms Claude from a code assistant into a programmable workbench. Workflows address key limitations of single-agent systems: agentic laziness (premature task completion), self-preferential bias (favoring own outputs), and goal drift (losing sight of original objectives). The system allows Claude to dynamically create execution frameworks using JavaScript. It can split tasks, dispatch parallel agents for isolated work (e.g., in separate worktrees), implement adversarial validation, run tournaments, and synthesize results. This multi-agent approach is valuable for tasks requiring deep research, factual verification, code migration, root cause analysis, large-scale triage, and qualitative sorting. Key patterns include: classify-and-route, fan-out-and-synthesize, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter, tournaments, and loop-until-done. While token usage is higher, workflows excel where tasks resemble programming—needing problem decomposition, isolated context, hypothesis testing, and handling many details. They extend Claude Code's utility beyond technical work to areas like business plan review, resume screening, and naming brainstorm. The feature is not a universal solution but points to a future where AI tool competitiveness depends on organizing reliable, reusable, and auditable execution flows for complex goals.

marsbit52m ago

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

marsbit52m ago

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

Hyperliquid: The 24/7 Trading "Convenience Store" for Wall Street Hyperliquid, a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange, has become a go-to platform for Wall Street traders seeking to trade around the clock, especially during traditional market closures. Founded by Jeff Yan, a former quantitative trader, after the FTX collapse, the platform emphasizes user self-custody of assets. It offers a wide range of perpetual contracts—leveraged derivatives with no expiry—on assets from Bitcoin and crude oil to the S&P 500 and even pre-IPO companies like SpaceX. A notable example involves a hedge fund trader who capitalized on geopolitical news over a weekend, securing a 243% return on oil derivatives before markets reopened. The platform, run by just 11 employees, generated approximately $800 million in revenue last year, and its native token HYPE has seen significant growth. Its rise highlights the merging of traditional finance and crypto. While U.S. users are currently restricted, recent CFTC rule changes could open access. The platform is known for its transparency, having processed $10 billion in liquidations during a market crash while competitors faltered. Regulators warn of the high risks and complexity of perpetual contracts for retail investors. Key to its appeal is a strong community culture, direct engagement with founders, and a simple interface. Despite rules against VPN use, it attracts global users with its permissionless approach. Hyperliquid plans to expand into prediction markets and options, aiming to eventually host all financial activity.

marsbit52m ago

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy ZEC

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Zcash (ZEC) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Zcash (ZEC) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Zcash (ZEC)After purchasing your Zcash (ZEC), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Zcash (ZEC)Easily trade Zcash (ZEC) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ZEC

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ZEC (ZEC) are presented below.

活动图片