Morgan Stanley launches Bitcoin ETF with $30mln inflows – Details

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-09Last updated on 2026-04-09

Abstract

Morgan Stanley launched its Bitcoin ETF (MSBT) on April 8, becoming the first major Wall Street bank to do so. The fund recorded $30.6 million in first-day inflows, a relatively modest amount compared to earlier spot Bitcoin ETF debuts from firms like Bitwise and Fidelity. However, MSBT distinguishes itself with a competitive expense ratio of 14 basis points, making it one of the cheapest available. The launch reflects growing institutional acceptance of Bitcoin, particularly among high-net-worth clients. It occurred amid a period of market volatility, with Bitcoin trading above $71,000 despite broader fluctuations. The move signals traditional finance's increasing conviction in crypto as a lasting asset class.

On the 8th of April, Morgan Stanley became the first Wall Street bank to launch its own Bitcoin-tracking exchange-traded fund under the ticker MSBT.

Debuting on the NYSE Arca, MSBT recorded $30.6 million in inflows on its first day, as reported by Farside Investors ETF monitor.

Interestingly, Senior Bloomberg Analyst Eric Balchunas had already predicted this inflow when he took to X and noted,

Source: Eric Balchunas/X

Morgan Stanley’s MSBT vs other Spot BTC ETFs debut

However, if looked back, in comparison to other Bitcoin [BTC] ETFs, the performance was low.

This is because on the 11th January 2024, the launch date of multiple Spot Bitcoin ETFs, Bitwise’s BITB saw inflows worth $237.9, followed by Fidelity’s FBTC, which recorded inflows worth $227.0 million.

Source: Farside Investors

Additionally, BlackRock’s IBIT saw inflows worth $111.7 million. In fact, only Invesco’s BTCO, Valkyrie’s BRRR, Wisdom Tree’s BTCW, and VanEck’s HOLD were the ones that recorded inflows less than MSBT.

Does MSBT have an edge in this competitive market?

Yet despite this, and being late to the launch list, the fees and scale are giving MSBT a secret advantage over others.

Accounting for an expense ratio of 14 basis points in comparison to Grayscale’s BTC’s 1 basis point and BlackRock’s IBIT’s 11 basis points, MSBT is the cheapest fund.

Expressing on the matter, Allyson Wallace, global head of ETFs at Morgan Stanley Investment Management, in a recent Bloomberg interview said,

The demand, especially from the high-net-worth investors, has been quite high. Viewed at the firm level, this is an asset class that is not going away.

Overall, this shift in sentiment shows how traditional institutional leaders are finally understanding the value of crypto.

Remarking on the same, Strategy’s new CEO, Phhong Lee, recently hit the nail on the head when he said,

In the last month, Morgan Stanley, Charles Schwab, and Citadel — among the world’s largest wealth managers, broker-dealers, and hedge funds — have announced plans to build Bitcoin capabilities. Probably nothing.

Volatile market dynamics

This comes at a time when the overall crypto market surged after the announcement of an immediate ceasefire in the ongoing U.S- Iran tension. In turn, this resulted in the crypto market surging over 4% on the 8th of April.

However, at press time, the crypto market was back in the hands of sellers and was trading at $2.42 trillion. Yet despite the drop, Bitcoin was still above the $70,00 mark, changing hands at $71,501.17 at the time of reporting.


Final Summary

  • Morgan Stanley’s Bitcoin ETF debut was not that strong, but fees and scales are giving it an additional advantage over other Spot BTC ETFs.
  • Launching at a time when the crypto market was volatile shows banks’ long-term conviction in Bitcoin.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the ticker symbol of Morgan Stanley's Bitcoin ETF and how much inflow did it record on its first day?

AThe ticker symbol is MSBT, and it recorded $30.6 million in inflows on its first day.

QHow does the first-day inflow of Morgan Stanley's MSBT compare to that of Bitwise's BITB and Fidelity's FBTC?

AMSBT's first-day inflow of $30.6 million was significantly lower than Bitwise's BITB ($237.9 million) and Fidelity's FBTC ($227.0 million).

QWhat is the expense ratio of Morgan Stanley's MSBT, and how does it compare to other major Bitcoin ETFs?

AMSBT has an expense ratio of 14 basis points, making it cheaper than Grayscale's BTC (1 basis point) and BlackRock's IBIT (11 basis points).

QAccording to Allyson Wallace, what type of investors have shown high demand for Morgan Stanley's Bitcoin ETF?

AAllyson Wallace stated that the demand, especially from high-net-worth investors, has been quite high.

QWhat event in the geopolitical landscape contributed to the crypto market surging over 4% on April 8th?

AThe crypto market surged over 4% on April 8th following the announcement of an immediate ceasefire in the ongoing U.S.-Iran tension.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit3m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit3m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit18m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit18m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalised services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalisation of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualisation of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasises these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalised Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

207 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.06Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片