Meme Wrapped Contracts: Is alt.fun Real Innovation or a Pseudo-Need?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-18Last updated on 2026-05-18

Abstract

A new platform called alt.fun on Hyperliquid has gained attention by merging meme coin creation with leveraged futures trading. Unlike typical meme platforms like Pump.fun, alt.fun requires creators to select an underlying asset (like HYPE or S&P 500) and a leverage level (2x, 3x, or 5x) to take a long or short position. The issued meme token is directly linked to a corresponding leveraged token (LT) on BounceTech, which represents that perpetual contract position. This means the token's price is driven by both the standard bonding curve (community buying/selling) and the performance of its leveraged underlying asset, allowing value to increase even without new purchases. The platform's "graduation" to a DEX pool requires a市值 of $9,000, achievable through market demand or underlying asset growth. While this mechanism can amplify gains in trending markets, it also introduces significant risks from asset volatility, leverage decay during rebalancing, and potential liquidation during sharp price moves. Despite early traction—with its top token ALT reaching an $8.8M market cap—alt.fun faces challenges. Its limited selection of 14 underlying assets constrains variety, leading to tokens with identical financial profiles. More fundamentally, critics argue it misunderstands the meme coin ethos: its tokens are primarily financial instruments tied to asset performance, lacking the community-driven narratives and cultural appeal essential for sustaining meme coin value. The article co...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web3_golem)

Last week, a new Meme issuance platform named alt.fun in the Hyperliquid ecosystem garnered significant attention from Meme players. Within just one week of launch, its leading token ALT reached a peak market cap of $8.8 million, with the current price having retraced, maintaining a market cap around $6.7 million.

The novelty of alt.fun can be understood as a combination of Pump.fun and Hyperliquid, where users can simultaneously experience the dual thrill of playing with Memes and opening contracts.

Introduction to the alt.fun Platform Mechanism

Specifically, each Meme token issued on alt.fun has a corresponding contract position matched on Hyperliquid at its core.

Similar to Pump.fun, any user can issue a Meme coin with one click on HyperEVM through the alt.fun platform. The token price is still influenced by a bonding curve. The total supply of the created Meme coin is 1 billion tokens, and when 75% of the tokens are sold, the token successfully "graduates" and is migrated to a HyperSwap V2 liquidity pool.

The difference from Pump.fun is that when creating a token on alt.fun, users also need to select an underlying asset and choose a limited leverage multiple (2x/3x/5x) to go short/long. At the same moment of token creation, the platform mints a corresponding amount of leveraged tokens (LT) on BounceTech(Odaily note: a permissionless leveraged token platform on Hyperliquid) and sends them to the user. This leveraged token corresponds to establishing a perpetual contract position on Hyperliquid. For example, if a user chooses to create a token based on a 3x long position on HYPE, what they receive is essentially a leveraged token that tracks the gains of a 3x long HYPE position.

As shown in the figure below, currently on alt.fun, users can choose from 14 types of underlying assets when creating a token. Similarly, when players buy Meme coins on this platform, the platform also mints corresponding leveraged tokens on BounceTech. If a player sells, this process is reversed—the leveraged token is redeemed, and the user receives the corresponding USDC.

This model of packaging and then selling leveraged tokens as underlying assets is similar to the securitization of specific risk exposures like futures and options in traditional finance, such as 3x inverse Nasdaq ETFs or 5x inverse crude oil products. In this process, the alt.fun platform acts like an asset management company, managing the long-term positions behind the leveraged tokens for users.

The price of such financial products primarily follows the net asset value. However, since the token price issued by the alt.fun platform is also simultaneously influenced by the bonding curve mechanism of Meme coins, the graduation mode and price drivers of tokens on this platform are not singular either.

Dual Graduation Modes and Price Drivers

This means that the price of tokens on the alt.fun platform is influenced by two factors: one is market sentiment driven by buying and selling, and the other is the performance of the underlying asset. So now you might understand what alt.fun's slogan "Your token pumps even when nobody's buying" means.

For instance, if a user creates a token based on a 3x long HYPE position with an initial investment of $20 (the platform's minimum buy-in size), and subsequently HYPE rises by 10%, then even if no one buys the token, the user's holding value increases by 30% to $26.

Based on this dual driver of price, the token graduation mode on the alt.fun platform is not limited to one method either. Specifically, its token graduation condition is reaching a market cap of $9,000, which essentially calculates the value of the leveraged token. Besides achieving graduation through buying tokens, if the token itself reaches a market cap of $9,000 due to the rise of its underlying asset, it can also graduate successfully. Therefore, whether a token reaches the graduation threshold is often a combined result of the two pricing mechanisms.

Of course, ideally, a rise in the underlying asset drives up the leveraged token, and combined with the emotional catalysis of the Meme market, the token might soar step by step. But once the underlying asset falls, the value of the leveraged token continuously shrinks, the market might panic-sell, and the token price could potentially crash instantly.

Thus, while alt.fun's mechanism can effectively leverage amplification effects, this only works in a one-sided market trend and requires users to accurately time the trend. If encountering volatile conditions in the underlying asset, users also have to bear leverage decay losses. This is because when the underlying asset price fluctuates, the platform needs to perform "rebalancing" to manage positions to avoid liquidation. This means that even if the underlying asset drops and then recovers, the leveraged token will suffer depreciation due to forced position reduction during the decline.

Moreover, in the case of wick or flash crash events, the platform might fail to react in time, potentially leading the leveraged token value to zero.

Meme or not Meme

Currently, the alt.fun platform has a total of 41 graduated tokens, with only two having a market cap exceeding one million: ALT (based on 5x long HYPE) and STONKS (based on 5x long S&P 500). The total number of users is around over 1,000. Although alt.fun is still in its early stages, we can also discern its current development bottlenecks from this.

First, the platform has too few underlying assets. Based on the current 14 types of underlying assets, there can be at most 84 different combinations of leveraged tokens. alt.fun has already seen leveraged tokens with the same leverage multiple shorting/longing the same underlying asset. For example, the current highest token ALT is based on 5x long HYPE, while another token with the ticker ATH is also based on 5x long HYPE. Apart from the token name and creation time, there is no difference between the two. If so, why wouldn't investors buy the lower market cap ATH?

Although alt.fun may support more underlying assets in the future, its core pain point is its inability to coalesce Meme coin community consensus.

The fundamental reason investors choose to buy leveraged tokens on the alt.fun platform instead of opening leverage directly on Hyperliquid themselves is essentially to gain greater price leverage. Moreover, because the platform manages position rebalancing in the backend for users, individual users can be "hands-off landlords," not having to worry about individual liquidation risks.

But this is also the problem. Investors buying an alt.fun token are essentially still basing their decision on future price expectations for its underlying asset, rather than on narratives, market games, or attention—these "meaningless things" are precisely what support the core value of a Meme. A Meme's ability to rise or gain market recognition is often not due to any practical value backing or financial design behind it; more importantly, it's the community propagation attribute.

As a Meme player, it's difficult for me to develop a love for a leveraged token similar to the affection for a particular Meme's community culture. If one truly has conviction in the underlying asset of a leveraged token, it might be better to issue one's own leveraged token rather than buy an existing one and bear unnecessary premiums.

Therefore, while the mechanism of the alt.fun platform appears novel, in my eyes, it's merely a mechanical innovation. If alt.fun pivots towards developing as a DeFi platform in the future, there might still be opportunities. But if it insists on forcefully entering the Meme issuance platform track, it is destined to be a flash in the pan.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core innovation of the alt.fun platform as described in the article?

AThe core innovation is combining a Meme token launchpad (similar to Pump.fun) with leveraged perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid. Each Meme token created on alt.fun has an underlying leveraged token position on Hyperliquid, allowing token value to be influenced by both market buying/selling and the performance of the chosen leveraged asset.

QAccording to the article, what is one major drawback or criticism of the alt.fun model?

AA major drawback is its perceived inability to build genuine Meme community consensus. The token's value is fundamentally tied to the performance of a leveraged financial product rather than narrative, culture, or community hype, which are considered the true drivers of Meme value. It risks being a 'mechanical innovation' lacking the social dynamics essential for Meme success.

QHow can a token on alt.fun 'graduate' or be considered successful besides being bought by others?

AA token can graduate if its market capitalization (calculated as the value of the underlying leveraged tokens) reaches $9,000. This can happen not only through direct purchases but also if the value of the underlying leveraged position increases significantly due to favorable price movement of the base asset (e.g., HYPE or S&P 500).

QWhat role does the BounceTech platform play in the alt.fun ecosystem?

ABounceTech is the permissionless leveraged token platform on Hyperliquid. When a user creates or buys a Meme token on alt.fun, the platform mints a corresponding leveraged token (LT) on BounceTech and sends it to the user. This LT represents a perpetual contract position on Hyperliquid. Selling the Meme token reverses the process, redeeming the LT for USDC.

QWhat potential risks does an investor face when holding a token from alt.fun?

AInvestors face several risks: 1) Exposure to the high volatility and potential liquidation of the underlying leveraged position. 2) Leverage decay during volatile or sideways markets due to mandatory 'rebalancing' of the position, which can erode value. 3) The risk of the leveraged token's value going to zero during extreme market events like a flash crash. 4) The premium paid for the Meme token layer on top of the leveraged token's intrinsic value.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit15h ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit15h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit15h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit15h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit15h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit15h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit15h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit15h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片