Measuring Market Asymmetry: The Glassnode Skew Index

insights.glassnodePublished on 2025-12-11Last updated on 2025-12-11

Abstract

The Glassnode Skew Index is a new metric designed to measure market asymmetry by aggregating information across the entire volatility smile, rather than relying on the traditional 25-delta skew which only samples two points. It condenses the volatility curve into two components: DownVol (volatility from OTM puts, indicating downside protection and fear) and UpVol (volatility from OTM calls, reflecting bullish sentiment and upside speculation). The index is calculated as UpVol minus DownVol. Positive values suggest optimism and call buying dominance, while negative values indicate hedging and risk aversion. It helps identify sentiment regimes, confirm or contradict price movements, and analyze different tenors for layered market outlooks. Available for multiple assets and tenors, it provides a standardized, cross-exchange view of options market sentiment.

When assessing options markets, one of the most powerful signals is skew: how the market prices risk on the upside versus the downside. The standard approach for traders is to look at the 25-delta skew: a simple comparison between the implied volatility of a 25-delta call and a 25-delta put. This method is effective, simple and familiar, but it samples only two points on the volatility curve. As a result, it often misses structure embedded in the rest of the surface.

The Glassnode Skew Index addresses this by aggregating information across the full smile, producing a more robust signal of where risk is being priced. We explain the purpose of the new metric, how it is constructed, and how it can fit into the broader toolkit of options analysis.

To access the new metrics visit Glassnode Studio. Available to Professional plan users.

View metric

Introducing the Glassnode Skew Index

Instead of focusing on two isolated strikes, the Glassnode Skew Index condenses the entire shape of the volatility smile into a single, intuitive measure of market asymmetry.

We divide the curve into two regions: one representing downside risk, and one representing upside potential. Each region is transformed into a standardized volatility measure as we calculate how much volatility the market is pricing into that segment.

  • DownVol represents the total implied volatility from out-of-the-money put options — protection against falling prices. When traders rush to buy puts, DownVol rises, signalling fear or a desire to hedge.
  • UpVol captures the opposite: the total volatility priced into out-of-the-money call options. This reflects how much traders are willing to pay for upside exposure or potential short-squeeze gains. When call demand increases, UpVol rises, often alongside strong bullish sentiment.

The difference between these two components gives us the skew index: Glassnode Skew Index = UpVol - DownVol

  • Positive values indicate a market that’s paying more for upside volatility – typically driven by optimism, momentum, or speculative call buying.
  • Negative values mean downside protection dominates, as investors prioritize safety and hedging over chasing upside.

In practical terms, The Glassnode Skew Index shows whether option traders are more concerned about a crash down, or more excited about a breakout up – and by how much.

How to Use the Skew Index

The Skew Index can be applied in several ways to interpret options market positioning, identify sentiment regimes, and understand how traders are distributing risk across upside and downside scenarios.

Map the Current Sentiment Regime

The index can help contextualize prevailing market conditions:

  • Deeply negative values indicate a market that is paying a premium for downside protection, consistent with defensive positioning.
  • Strongly positive values indicate that investors are paying more for upside participation, often in the context of strong trends and speculative call activity.

Monitoring these extremes helps identify when fear or euphoria dominates the options market.

Use it as a Confirmation or Divergence Tool

The index can complement movements in spot price:

  • A rising Skew Index alongside a rising spot price suggests that the options market is reinforcing the move through increased demand for upside volatility.
  • A rally in spot with a Skew Index that stays sharply negative points to a distrusted move, where traders remain hedged and cautious.
  • A falling market with a heavily negative Skew Index confirms a classic risk-off environment with significant demand for protection.
  • A falling market with a positive Skew Index can indicate that traders are already looking through the weakness and positioning for a recovery.

This makes the index useful for evaluating whether options flows validate or contradict price action.

Interpreting Tenor Combinations

Different tenors can convey different layers of sentiment:

  • A negative 1-week skew with neutral or positive 3- and 6-month values often indicates temporary stress overlaying a constructive medium- and long-term outlook.
  • A very positive 1-week skew with subdued longer tenors suggests that traders are enthusiastic about the near-term, but reluctant to extend risk far into the future.
  • When skew is consistently elevated or depressed across all tenors, it points to a stable, regime-like sentiment environment rather than a short-lived spike.

For example, in June 2022, we saw a clear tenor divergence: the 1-week Skew Index (red) plunged into deeply negative territory, signalling aggressive demand for short-dated puts over calls. Meanwhile, the 3-month (yellow) and 6-month (green) skews moved higher, indicating that investors were still willing to pay relatively more for upside exposure further out the curve.

In other words, the fear was mainly short-term, and longer-dated options continued to lean towards upside scenarios, implying that many participants expect better prices further out on the horizon.

How it works under the hood

We calculate the Glassnode Skew Index by aggregating option prices across many strikes on both sides of the distribution. These prices are transformed into standardized measures of upside and downside implied volatility, aligned to fixed maturities such as 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

We then combine data across major venues so traders can compare BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, or PAXG on consistent terms. This standardization removes the distortions that arise from strike irregularities, liquidity gaps, or exchange-specific conventions.

The result is a cross-asset, cross-tenor gauge of options market sentiment that captures the full structure of the volatility smile rather than relying on a single-point skew measure.

Available for:

  • Resolutions: 10 minutes, hourly, daily
  • Tenors: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
  • Assets: BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, PAXG
  • Exchanges: Deribit, OKX

  • Follow us on X for timely market updates and analysis
  • Join our Telegram channel for regular market insights
  • For on-chain metrics, dashboards, and alerts, visit Glassnode Studio

Disclaimer: This report is for informational and educational purposes only. The analysis represents a limited case study with significant constraints and should not be interpreted as investment advice or definitive trading signals. Past performance patterns do not guarantee future results. Always conduct thorough due diligence and consider multiple factors before making investment decisions.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit16m ago

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit16m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit23m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit23m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手26m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手26m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手42m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手42m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy ONE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Harmony (ONE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Harmony (ONE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Harmony (ONE)After purchasing your Harmony (ONE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Harmony (ONE)Easily trade Harmony (ONE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.4k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ONE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ONE (ONE) are presented below.

活动图片