Lido: Revenue down 40%, market share intact – New report highlights mixed signals

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-25Last updated on 2026-03-25

Abstract

Lido, a leading Ethereum staking provider, reported a 23% year-on-year decline in annual revenue, falling to $40.5 million in 2025 from $52.4 million the previous year. The drop is attributed to staking outflows, a network-wide decrease in staking APR, and intensified competition from exchange and institutional staking services. Despite a broader surge in staking demand—driven by Spot ETH ETFs and corporate treasury activity—Lido experienced significant outflows, including 310,000 ETH in March 2026 alone. However, it maintained a dominant 24% market share with 8.8 million staked ETH. Looking ahead, Lido plans to diversify by expanding institutional distribution channels, scaling its validator marketplace, and enhancing its Lido Earn product. Additionally, the protocol aims to strengthen economic alignment with its LDO token through a proposed $10 million annual buyback program, expected to be formalized in Q2 2026. At the time of reporting, LDO was trading at $0.299, down 80% from its mid-2025 peak.

Ethereum staking provider Lido has reported a decline in annual revenue, citing a challenging macro landscape and competition.

In its 2025 annual report, the Lido Foundation said that the protocol’s total revenue was $40.5 million, down from $52.4 million reached in 2024—a 23% decline in revenue on a year-on-year (YoY) basis.

Source: Lido

Lido’s market lead faces headwinds

Commenting on the revenue drop, Lido noted,

2025 unfolded under rewards compression driven by staking outflows and a network-wide decline in staking APR.

Regarding staking outflows, the protocol noted that this was further fueled by a structural shift towards exchange and institutional staking.

Capital rotation away from Simple LST toward exchange and institutional staking, and intensified competition, reduced the size of the segment where Lido holds category leadership.

Source: Lido

Well, the staking demand has soared in recent months, reaching a record 30.7% of total ETH supply (38.2 million staked ETH). The uptick was driven by Spot ETH ETFs and treasury firms activating the yield feature for their investors.

In contrast, Lido’s outflows haven’t abated even in 2026. In March alone, Lido led the staking outflows, with nearly 310K ETH leaving the protocol.

Source: Dune

Even so, Lido maintained its dominant market share at 24% (8.8 million staked ETH). However, it will focus on diversification in 2026.

These will include doubling down on institutional distribution channels for low-risk staking segments (e.g., via WisdomTree Physical Lido Staked Ether), expanding its Lido Earn product, and scaling its validator marketplace.

Source: Lido

LDO token alignment plans

Lido also noted that it will advance ‘stronger economic alignment’ between the protocol performance and LDO. According to ongoing discussions, part of the token accrual plan will include automated token buyback via a ‘treasury surplus fund.’

This proposal was floated last November, with an annual budget of $10 million for the buyback program. A formal plan for the same is expected in Q2 2026, but it remains to be seen how LDO, the protocol’s native token, will react to the update.

At the time of writing, LDO traded at $0.299 and was down 80% from the H2 2025 high of $1.5.


Final Summary

  • Lido revenue dropped by 23% to $40.5M amid rising staking competition from spot ETH ETFs, treasury firms, and centralized exchanges.
  • LDO token alignment and the $10M buyback program are expected to be formalized in Q2 2026.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage decline in Lido's annual revenue from 2024 to 2025, and what were the total revenue figures for those years?

ALido's annual revenue declined by 23% year-on-year, from $52.4 million in 2024 to $40.5 million in 2025.

QWhat two main reasons did Lido cite for the decline in its revenue and the staking outflows?

ALido cited rewards compression driven by staking outflows and a network-wide decline in staking APR, which were further fueled by a structural shift towards exchange and institutional staking.

QDespite the outflows, what market share of the total ETH staking market did Lido maintain?

ALido maintained its dominant market share at 24%, representing 8.8 million staked ETH.

QWhat are Lido's three main areas of focus for diversification in 2026?

ALido's focus for 2026 includes doubling down on institutional distribution channels for low-risk staking, expanding its Lido Earn product, and scaling its validator marketplace.

QWhat is the key feature of the LDO token alignment plan, and when is a formal proposal for it expected?

AA key feature of the plan is an automated token buyback via a 'treasury surplus fund' with an annual budget of $10 million. A formal proposal for this is expected in Q2 2026.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit7m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit7m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit8m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit8m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News18m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News18m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit35m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit35m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片