Justin Sun-Linked Wallets Accumulate $40M Worth of LIT

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-02Last updated on 2026-01-02

Abstract

A number of wallets associated with Justin Sun have accumulated a significant amount of LIT tokens, the native asset of the Lighter decentralized exchange. On-chain analysis reveals that four wallets linked to Sun purchased 1.6 million LIT shortly after the token’s launch, eventually accumulating a total of 14.89 million LIT—valued at approximately $39.8 million. The activity was tied to liquidity provisioning rather than airdrop farming, with around $200 million deposited into Lighter’s Liquidity Provider Program. Sun now holds about 5.32% of the circulating supply. LIT launched on December 30 as part of a futures DEX on Ethereum zk-rollup, with 25% allocated to early users and liquidity providers. The token experienced volatility post-launch, dropping about 30% from its initial trading price of $3.40.

A number of wallets associated with Just Sun have silently made a quite large place in the newly launched LIT token by Lighter. The on-chain data has revealed that the purchases were linked to liquidity provisioning instead of airdrop farming.

The on-chain researcher MLM released its analysis on Jan 1, revealing that 4 wallets linked with Justin Sun accumulated 1.6 million LIT soon after the token generation event, taking the amount to about 6.4 million LIT, whose value is said to be around $17 million as per the current market rate.

The wallets’ funding took place 34 and 50 minutes after the closing of the Lighter airdrop allocation form. However, there is no proof that the wallets also participated in earlier points farming.

Adding more to this, the activity deposits around $200 million into the Lighter’s Liquidity Provider Program. Further, he took out about $38 million, using around $33 million to buy an extra 13.25 million LIT on the market. Totalling this, the wallets now have 14.89 million LIT, sitting at $39.8 million.

A Dig Into LIT

With this, Sun has around 5.32% of the circulating supply and 1.33% of the total supply. About $5.5 million stays in spot balances associated with the same group of wallets. The data has also dropped hints that similar arrangements may persist for other big LLP participants. A wallet deposited $50 million USDC in the programme and, after around a month, got 874,875 LIT via attribution.

Lighter rolled out LIT on December 30, an efficient, long-lasting futures DEX made as an Ethereum zk-rollup. With the launch, 25% was launched to early users and liquidity providers, quickly taking the circulating supply to around 250 million tokens.

After the launch, LIT is under the pressure because of liquidity withdrawals and post-airdrop profit-taking, which usually can be seen for new tokens having wide distributions. The debut price stood at around $3.40 at the time of initial trading but soon experienced volatility, falling around 30% to $2.45-$2.80.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Jupiter Launches Mobile V3 With Native Pro Trading Tools

TagsJustin SunlighterLIT

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow much LIT did the wallets linked to Justin Sun accumulate, and what is its approximate value?

AThe wallets linked to Justin Sun accumulated 14.89 million LIT, with an approximate value of $39.8 million.

QWhat was the primary purpose of the purchases made by the Justin Sun-linked wallets according to on-chain data?

AAccording to on-chain data, the purchases were linked to liquidity provisioning, not airdrop farming.

QWhat percentage of the circulating and total supply of LIT does Justin Sun now hold?

AJustin Sun holds approximately 5.32% of the circulating supply and 1.33% of the total supply of LIT.

QWhen was the LIT token launched, and what is Lighter?

ALighter rolled out the LIT token on December 30. Lighter is an efficient, long-lasting futures DEX built as an Ethereum zk-rollup.

QWhat happened to the price of LIT shortly after its launch?

AShortly after its launch, the price of LIT experienced volatility, falling around 30% from its debut price of approximately $3.40 to a range of $2.45-$2.80 due to liquidity withdrawals and post-airdrop profit-taking.

Related Reads

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手40m ago

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手40m ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1h ago

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy SUN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SUN (SUN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SUN (SUN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SUN (SUN)After purchasing your SUN (SUN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SUN (SUN)Easily trade SUN (SUN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.5k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy SUN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SUN (SUN) are presented below.

活动图片