It's Bankless That Needs Ethereum, Not Ethereum That Needs Bankless

链捕手Published on 2026-05-21Last updated on 2026-05-21

Abstract

Titled "Bankless Needs Ethereum, Not the Other Way Around," this article analyzes the significant recent news involving Bankless, a prominent crypto media outlet. Bankless co-founder David Hoffman announced the sale of all his ETH holdings, while the company also reportedly underwent major layoffs, with its founders parting ways. The news, likened to a high-profile defection, initially sent shockwaves through the Ethereum community, given Bankless's historical role as a key evangelist and "semi-official" narrative builder for Ethereum. For years, through its podcasts and writings, Bankless championed core Ethereum ideas like "ultrasound money" and the blockchain's role as a new financial settlement layer, acting as a crucial community hub and belief system during its growth phase. However, the article argues this development is not necessarily negative for Ethereum. It suggests Bankless's "first mission"—serving as Ethereum's passionate, inward-facing "propaganda department"—has largely been completed. As Ethereum matures and moves towards mainstream, institutional adoption, the narrative baton has shifted. Today, the value propositions of ETH are increasingly communicated to traditional finance by asset managers like BlackRock and VanEck, public companies adding ETH to their treasuries, and established financial figures. This represents a natural evolution towards a more decentralized, professional, and institutionally-focused narrative network. Therefore, while Bankless's ...

Author: Yu Gu, ChainCatcher

Under the shadow of a series of negative news such as the continuous resignation of high-level foundation executives and multiple institutions selling off ETH, the Ethereum ecosystem has once again been hit by sensational news.

Today, David Hoffman, co-founder of Bankless, confirmed on the X platform that he has liquidated all his ETH holdings. Simultaneously, news emerged that Bankless is undergoing massive layoffs and the two founders are parting ways.

In response, prominent KOL Chen Jian gave a rather vivid analogy—"Bankless co-founder David selling all his ETH is similar in nature to Huang Chang-yeop's defection from North Korea back in the day." The impact of this statement is enough to send a chill down the spine of anyone familiar with Bankless's status in the Ethereum ecosystem.

However, in the current context of the crypto industry's increasing mainstream and institutional adoption, and with the basic transfer of Ethereum's narrative authority, Bankless's retreat is actually understandable and may not necessarily be negative news for Ethereum.

I. Bankless: The Former "Propaganda Department" of Ethereum

Before delving into this earthquake, one must first understand what Bankless truly represents in the Ethereum ecosystem.

Bankless is far more than just a crypto media platform. It began as a podcast and a Substack subscription channel, with a core idea simple: to replace traditional banking using self-custody, DeFi, and Ethereum as the settlement layer for a new financial system.

David Hoffman and Ryan Sean Adams vigorously advocated that Ethereum is "ultra sound money." They built a media brand around Ethereum, maximizing its exposure and becoming two of the loudest Ethereum supporters in the industry. Today, Bankless is widely recognized as one of the most influential media brands in the crypto world, especially within the Ethereum ecosystem.

David Hoffman is particularly known for his firm personal beliefs. During the 2018 bear market, when Ethereum's price fell to $300, he actively bought ETH. Consequently, he became a symbol of Ethereum maximalism on Crypto Twitter.

Bankless's unique position lies in the fact that it is not merely a "reporter" on the Ethereum ecosystem but a co-builder of the Ethereum narrative itself.

"Ethereum is ultrasound money," "Ethereum will usher in the industrial revolution of the internet," "Ethereum is digital oil"... A series of his viewpoints have been widely disseminated in the crypto industry, injecting a continuous stream of belief and fuel into the Ethereum ecosystem.

From conversations with Vitalik Buterin to in-depth analyses of the Ethereum roadmap, and continuously providing theoretical packaging for new narratives like L2, DeFi, and restaking, Bankless has long played the dual role of the Ethereum community's "information hub" and "spiritual lighthouse." The two co-founders have also long acted as core evangelists for Ethereum—Hoffman himself publicly stated that 99% of his personal wealth was held in Ethereum.

Chen Jian compared Bankless to the "Ethereum party newspaper"—the accuracy of this metaphor lies in revealing that Bankless's role had long transcended that of a regular commercial media outlet; it was a value-output machine with a "quasi-official" or "semi-official" status within the ecosystem.

However, in the last year or two, Bankless's narrative authority within the Ethereum ecosystem has noticeably weakened, rarely putting forward distinctive viewpoints with high virality and unique perspectives.

II. What Exactly Happened

Earlier today, Bankless co-founder David Hoffman announced that he had sold all his ETH holdings. The other co-founder, Ryan Sean Adams, subsequently retweeted, stating that the first phase of Bankless has ended, and his six-year collaboration with David exploring crypto, DeFi, and Ethereum has come to a close. They have now entered the second phase, transitioning to a supporting role to continue providing support for Bankless.

Soon, Lucas Campbell, co-founder of FireEyes DAO and former Bankless research analyst, further disclosed on X that Bankless apparently fired most of its team members yesterday, and its founders did not offer a single word of thanks or a public statement to help the team members find new positions.

Jean-Paul Faraj, Head of Business Development at Bankless, posted on X recounting his experience working at Bankless, stating that today is his last day at the company, which also indirectly confirms the accuracy of the mass layoff news.

This series of messages conveys at least two clear signals: first, Bankless co-founder David Hoffman is no longer a staunch ETH bull, and second, after massive layoffs, Bankless will struggle to maintain its current content output frequency and intensity, and its status as Ethereum's "propaganda department" is over.

There have been signs of all this. Just a day ago, Ryan Sean Adams criticized the Ethereum Foundation, stating, "The future of Ethereum can no longer rely on the Ethereum Foundation (EF). EF is important, but Ethereum needs new institutions to step in and fill the gaps. We need an organization that genuinely wants Ethereum's asset (ETH) to win—to grow in quantity—and is willing to speak out and execute. EF is not that, and never will be."

And earlier this month, David Hoffman publicly stated on a podcast that he had sold his CryptoPunk, which he had held for years and carried significant symbolic meaning, and converted the proceeds mainly into Zcash (ZEC).



III. The End of a Phased Mission

In Ryan Sean Adams's response, there is a noteworthy statement: Bankless's first-phase mission is over, and it is now moving towards the second phase. So, what exactly was Bankless's first-phase mission? And what is its upcoming mission?

As mentioned earlier, Bankless largely served as a semi-official "propaganda department" for Ethereum, continuously transmitting the specific roles and concepts of new technologies like Layer2 to the crypto community and "recharging faith" in the market.

In the early stages of Ethereum's evolution from a "geek toy" to a "world computer of crypto," such high-density, high-belief content output was essential—it helped Ethereum consolidate its most loyal community amidst the siege of countless public chains and supported ETH's initial narrative premium.

But the problem is, this phased mission is largely complete.

In the past year or two, purely narrative-driven momentum within the crypto industry has noticeably weakened. The growth of adoption increasingly relies on the integration of the traditional financial system, especially in the realms of payments and RWA (Real World Assets). Ethereum no longer needs a few impassioned articles to convince people "not to trust banks," but rather needs to truly get banks, asset management companies, and publicly listed companies to treat Ethereum as infrastructure.

As the type of target audience switches, the baton of narrative has quietly been passed on.

Asset management companies represented by Bitwise, VanEck, and BlackRock are now conveying ETH's value proposition to the traditional financial world through ETF products, research reports, and public statements. While MicroStrategy focuses primarily on Bitcoin, its model of "public companies buying crypto assets" has been emulated by others, and some listed companies have begun incorporating ETH into their balance sheets. Figures with traditional finance backgrounds, such as Tom Lee and Larry Fink, have become the new faces explaining Ethereum's concepts to the mainstream world. Their language is more compliant, professional, and more acceptable to traditional capital.

Bankless's role is being replaced by a more decentralized, professional, and diverse "narrative network."

For a long time, Ethereum's "moat" was not technical superiority or user scale, but a complete system of value narratives jointly woven by Vitalik, the Ethereum Foundation, core developers, and evangelist media like Bankless. Technology can be imitated, ecosystems can be copied, but this community of faith accumulated since 2015 is almost irreplaceable.

Now, although Bankless is fading out, its role is not left in a vacuum. A host of new forces more aligned with Ethereum's current stage of development are naturally taking over, including various institutional research departments, mainstream entrepreneurs, on-chain data platforms, and so on.

From this perspective, Bankless's retreat is not a crisis but an inevitable outcome of the maturation and decentralization of Ethereum's narrative system. A healthy ecosystem should not rely long-term on a single "semi-official" media outlet to sustain its faith. When Ethereum has entered the sightline of mainstream finance, and when ETF fund flows influence market sentiment more than any podcast, the historical mission of the "propaganda department" has already been accomplished.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the two key signals conveyed by the recent series of announcements from Bankless founders?

AThe key signals are: 1) Bankless co-founder David Hoffman is no longer a staunch ETH bull, as evidenced by him selling his entire ETH holdings. 2) Following large-scale layoffs, Bankless will struggle to maintain its previous content output, signaling the end of its role as Ethereum's dominant "propaganda department".

QAccording to the article, what was Bankless's primary role and mission in the Ethereum ecosystem during its "Phase One"?

ABankless served as Ethereum's semi-official "propaganda department" or "spiritual lighthouse." Its mission was to co-build the Ethereum narrative, vigorously promote concepts like "ultrasound money," act as an information hub, and provide ideological fuel and unwavering belief to the community, especially during its early growth against competing blockchains.

QWhy does the article argue that Bankless's 'retreat' might not be negative for Ethereum?

AThe article argues it's not negative because Bankless's phase-one mission of community building and narrative evangelism is largely complete. Ethereum's narrative is now being driven and legitimized for mainstream adoption by a more diversified network including asset managers (e.g., BlackRock), traditional finance figures, and institutional research, marking a maturation and decentralization of its advocacy ecosystem.

QWhat specific actions by David Hoffman and Ryan Sean Adams prior to the announcement hinted at their shifting stance?

ADavid Hoffman sold his symbolically significant CryptoPunk NFT, converting most proceeds to Zcash (ZEC). Ryan Sean Adams publicly criticized the Ethereum Foundation, stating it is not and never will be an organization truly focused on ETH's price growth, and called for new institutions to fill the gap.

QHow does the KOL '陈剑' metaphorically describe Bankless's significance, and what does the article say this reveals about its role?

AChen Jian metaphorically described Bankless as the "Ethereum Party Newspaper." The article states this reveals Bankless's role transcended that of a typical commercial media outlet. It occupied a quasi-official or semi-official position within the ecosystem, functioning as a core value-output machine for Ethereum.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit6h ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit6h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit6h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit6h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit6h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit6h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit6h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit6h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片