Is Ethereum undervalued? These 2 on-chain signals say…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-21Last updated on 2025-12-21

Abstract

Ethereum has underperformed in 2025, declining roughly 12% YTD while assets like gold and equities climbed. However, two key on-chain signals suggest it may be undervalued. First, Ethereum's network remains the dominant settlement layer for global dollar liquidity, processing $90-100 billion in stablecoin transfers daily, as users prioritize security and finality over lower fees. Second, large holders are accumulating more ETH even as prices approach their average cost basis, showing patience and confidence despite squeezed profits. This indicates underlying strength that price action alone may not reflect.

Ethereum has been one of the worst-performing major assets of 2025 so far. But don’t let that fool you!

Every day, tens of billions of dollars in stablecoins move across Ethereum, making it THE settlement layer for global dollar liquidity. Large holders are accumulating ETH as well, even with prices down in the dumps.

Is the general market missing the bigger picture?

Putting Ethereum’s bad year in context

Ethereum has had a bruising start to 2025. While silver, gold, and U.S. equities have climbed steadily, ETH slid roughly 12% YTD, making it one of the weakest performers among major assets.

Bitcoin [BTC] has fared slightly better, while the altcoin market has fallen far further.

Capital is rotating into metals and traditional risk assets, all while Ethereum’s [ETH] price has gone nowhere. It looks like a market that has lost interest.

But price performance alone doesn’t tell you everything.

Where the money actually settles

On an average day, Ethereum Mainnet processes roughly $90-100 billion in Stablecoin Transfers, far more than any other network. According to Leon Waidmann, Head of Research, OnChainHQ, this is mostly USDT and USDC moving for payments, treasury operations, and real settlement.

Other chains are growing, and some are cheaper or faster. But stablecoin volume concentrates where trust, neutrality, and finality matter most.

Users willingly pay higher fees because a failed settlement is not an option at this scale.

While prices stall...

Large holders are behaving very differently.

ETH has repeatedly traded near the realized price of accumulation addresses; essentially, the average entry price of long-term whales. Instead of selling into weakness, these wallets have continued to add more ETH.

The timing is interesting.

Whale profits have been squeezed close to zero, a point where many would normally reduce exposure. Instead, inflows to accumulation addresses are increasing. That’s a lot of patience!

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow has Ethereum performed compared to other major assets in 2025 so far?

AEthereum has been one of the worst-performing major assets of 2025, sliding roughly 12% year-to-date, while assets like silver, gold, and U.S. equities have climbed steadily.

QWhat is the daily volume of stablecoin transfers processed on the Ethereum Mainnet?

AOn an average day, Ethereum Mainnet processes roughly $90-100 billion in stablecoin transfers, which is far more than any other network.

QAccording to the article, why do users choose to settle large stablecoin transfers on Ethereum despite higher fees?

AUsers willingly pay higher fees on Ethereum because a failed settlement is not an option at this scale, and the network offers the trust, neutrality, and finality that matter most for large settlements.

QHow are large Ethereum holders (whales) behaving despite the price weakness?

AInstead of selling into weakness, large holders (whales) have continued to accumulate more ETH, even as their profits have been squeezed close to zero.

QWhat is the 'realized price of accumulation addresses' mentioned in the article?

AThe 'realized price of accumulation addresses' refers to the average entry price of long-term whale wallets. ETH has repeatedly traded near this price point recently.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报37m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报37m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News55m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News55m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片