Is Ethereum undervalued? These 2 on-chain signals say…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-21Last updated on 2025-12-21

Abstract

Ethereum has underperformed in 2025, declining roughly 12% YTD while assets like gold and equities climbed. However, two key on-chain signals suggest it may be undervalued. First, Ethereum's network remains the dominant settlement layer for global dollar liquidity, processing $90-100 billion in stablecoin transfers daily, as users prioritize security and finality over lower fees. Second, large holders are accumulating more ETH even as prices approach their average cost basis, showing patience and confidence despite squeezed profits. This indicates underlying strength that price action alone may not reflect.

Ethereum has been one of the worst-performing major assets of 2025 so far. But don’t let that fool you!

Every day, tens of billions of dollars in stablecoins move across Ethereum, making it THE settlement layer for global dollar liquidity. Large holders are accumulating ETH as well, even with prices down in the dumps.

Is the general market missing the bigger picture?

Putting Ethereum’s bad year in context

Ethereum has had a bruising start to 2025. While silver, gold, and U.S. equities have climbed steadily, ETH slid roughly 12% YTD, making it one of the weakest performers among major assets.

Bitcoin [BTC] has fared slightly better, while the altcoin market has fallen far further.

Capital is rotating into metals and traditional risk assets, all while Ethereum’s [ETH] price has gone nowhere. It looks like a market that has lost interest.

But price performance alone doesn’t tell you everything.

Where the money actually settles

On an average day, Ethereum Mainnet processes roughly $90-100 billion in Stablecoin Transfers, far more than any other network. According to Leon Waidmann, Head of Research, OnChainHQ, this is mostly USDT and USDC moving for payments, treasury operations, and real settlement.

Other chains are growing, and some are cheaper or faster. But stablecoin volume concentrates where trust, neutrality, and finality matter most.

Users willingly pay higher fees because a failed settlement is not an option at this scale.

While prices stall...

Large holders are behaving very differently.

ETH has repeatedly traded near the realized price of accumulation addresses; essentially, the average entry price of long-term whales. Instead of selling into weakness, these wallets have continued to add more ETH.

The timing is interesting.

Whale profits have been squeezed close to zero, a point where many would normally reduce exposure. Instead, inflows to accumulation addresses are increasing. That’s a lot of patience!

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow has Ethereum performed compared to other major assets in 2025 so far?

AEthereum has been one of the worst-performing major assets of 2025, sliding roughly 12% year-to-date, while assets like silver, gold, and U.S. equities have climbed steadily.

QWhat is the daily volume of stablecoin transfers processed on the Ethereum Mainnet?

AOn an average day, Ethereum Mainnet processes roughly $90-100 billion in stablecoin transfers, which is far more than any other network.

QAccording to the article, why do users choose to settle large stablecoin transfers on Ethereum despite higher fees?

AUsers willingly pay higher fees on Ethereum because a failed settlement is not an option at this scale, and the network offers the trust, neutrality, and finality that matter most for large settlements.

QHow are large Ethereum holders (whales) behaving despite the price weakness?

AInstead of selling into weakness, large holders (whales) have continued to accumulate more ETH, even as their profits have been squeezed close to zero.

QWhat is the 'realized price of accumulation addresses' mentioned in the article?

AThe 'realized price of accumulation addresses' refers to the average entry price of long-term whale wallets. ETH has repeatedly traded near this price point recently.

Related Reads

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit26m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit26m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit57m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit57m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片