IOSG Founder: Bitcoin Undergoes Historic Handover, Bullish on the First Half of 2026

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-22Last updated on 2025-12-22

Abstract

In a significant market shift, Bitcoin has undergone a historic transfer of ownership from retail to institutional players, marking a structural transformation in the crypto landscape. Despite BTC's -5.4% and ETH's -12% price decline in 2025, institutional inflows via ETFs reached $25 billion, with BlackRock, Fidelity, and Grayscale dominating holdings. Institutional ownership now stands at 24%, while retail participation dropped 66%. Three waves of long-term holder sell-offs, totaling 1.4 million BTC ($121.17B), were fully absorbed by institutional demand, preventing a crash. Key drivers include pro-crypto policies under the Trump administration, ETF integration, and corporate treasury adoption. The outlook for 2026 is bullish, especially in H1, due to expected policy tailwinds and continued institutional accumulation, with price targets ranging from $120K to $250K. Risks include macro volatility and mid-term election uncertainties, but the transition to an institutional-led market suggests a new cycle of structural growth, not a bull market top.

Author: Jocy, Founder of IOSG

This is a fundamental shift in market structure, yet most people are still viewing the new era with old-cycle logic.

Recapping the 2025 crypto market, we see a paradigm shift from retail speculation to institutional allocation. Core data shows institutional holdings at 24%, while retail participation dropped by 66% — the 2025 crypto market handover is complete. Forget the four-year cycle; the crypto market in the institutional era has new rules! Let me break down the truth behind this "worst year" with data and logic.

1/ First, look at the surface data — 2025 asset performance:

Traditional Assets:

- Silver +130%

- Gold +66%

- Copper +34%

- Nasdaq +20.7%

- S&P 500 +16.2%

Crypto Assets:

- BTC -5.4%

- ETH -12%

- Major altcoins -35% to -60%

Looks bad? Keep reading.

2/ But if you only look at the price, you're missing the most important signal.

Although BTC was down -5.4% for the year, it hit a new all-time high of $126,080 during the period.

More importantly: what happened while the price was falling?

BTC ETF net inflows in 2025: $25 billion

Total AUM: $114-120 billion

Institutional holdings: 24%

Some are panicking, some are buying.

3/ Here's the first key judgment:

Market dominance has shifted from retail to institutions.

The approval of the BTC spot ETF in January 2024 was a watershed moment. The market, previously dominated by retail and OGs, is now led by macro investors, corporate treasuries, and sovereign funds.

This isn't just a change in participants; it's a rewrite of the game rules.

4/ Data supports this judgment:

BlackRock's IBIT reached $50 billion AUM in 228 days, becoming the fastest-growing ETF in history. It now holds 780-800k BTC, surpassing MicroStrategy's 670k BTC. Grayscale, BlackRock, and Fidelity account for 89% of total BTC ETF assets. 86% of institutional investors already hold or plan to allocate to digital assets.

BTC's correlation with the S&P 500 rose from 0.29 in 2024 to 0.5 in 2025.

5/ Look at BlackRock and MicroStrategy's aggressive strategies:

BlackRock's IBIT holds about 60% of the BTC ETF market share, with 800k BTC, surpassing MicroStrategy's 671,268 BTC.

Institutional participation continues to rise:

* 13F filing institutions hold 24% of total AUM (Q3 2025)

* More professional institutional investors account for 26.3%, up 5.2% from Q3

* Major asset managers account for 57% of 13F BTC ETF holdings, professional hedge funds account for 41% of BTC ETF holdings — together nearly 98%. This shows that current institutional holdings are mainly these two types of professional investors, not including more conservative institutions like pension funds and insurance companies (which may still be watching or just starting to allocate).

* FBTC institutional holdings account for 33.9%

Major institutional investors include Abu Dhabi Investment Council (ADIC), Mubadala Sovereign Wealth Fund, CoinShares, Harvard University Endowment (holding $116 million in IBIT), etc. Large traditional brokers and banks have also increased their Bitcoin ETF holdings. Wells Fargo reported holdings of $491 million, Morgan Stanley $724 million, and JPMorgan $346 million. This shows Bitcoin ETF products are being continuously integrated by major financial intermediaries.

The question is: why are institutions continuing to accumulate at "high" prices?

6/ Because they're looking at the cycle, not the price.

After March 2024, long-term holders (LTH) cumulatively sold 1.4 million BTC, worth $121.17 billion.

This is an unprecedented supply release.

But miraculously — the price didn't crash.

Why? Because institutions and corporate treasuries absorbed all this selling pressure.

7/ The three waves of selling by long-term holders:

From March 2024 to November 2025, long-term holders (LTH) cumulatively sold about 1.4 million BTC (worth $121.17 billion).

First wave (late 2023 - early 2024): ETF approval, BTC $25K→$73K

Second wave (late 2024): Trump elected, BTC冲向$100K

Third wave (2025): BTC sustained above $100K

Unlike the single explosive distributions in 2013, 2017, and 2021, this was a multi-wave, sustained distribution. Over the past year, we've seen BTC横盘 around highs for a year — something that has never happened before. BTC unmoved for 2+ years has decreased by 1.6 million since early 2024 (约$140 billion).

But the market's absorption capacity has strengthened.

8/ Meanwhile, what are retail investors doing?

Active addresses continue to decline.

Google searches for "Bitcoin" hit an 11-month low.

$0-$1 small transaction volume down 66.38%.

$10 million+ large transaction volume up 59.26%.

River estimates retail net sold 247,000 BTC in 2025 (约$23 billion).

Retail is selling, institutions are buying.

9/ This leads to the second key judgment:

The current phase is not a "bull market top" but an "institutional accumulation period."

Traditional cycle logic:

Retail frenzy → price surge → crash → restart

New cycle logic:

Stable institutional allocation → narrowing volatility → rising price center → structural上涨

This explains why the price is横盘, but funds keep flowing in.

10/ The policy environment is the third dimension.

The Trump administration has delivered in 2025:

✅ Crypto Executive Order (signed 1.23)

✅ Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (~200k BTC)

✅ GENIUS Act stablecoin regulatory framework

✅ SEC Chair change (Atkins appointed)

Pending:

⏳ Market Structure Act (77% probability of passing before 2027)

⏳ Stablecoins buying short-term U.S. Treasuries, scale to grow 10x in next three years

Potential impact of 2026 midterm elections

The 2026 election will see 435 House seats and 33 Senate seats up for grabs. 274 "pro-crypto" candidates were elected in 2024, but banking lobbying groups plan to spend $100 million+ to counter crypto donation influence. Polls show 64% of crypto investors consider a candidate's crypto stance "very important."

Policy friendliness is unprecedented.

11/ But there's a timing window issue:

The midterm elections are in November 2026.

Historical pattern: "Election year, policy first"

→ Policy密集落地 in the first half

→ Wait for election results in the second half

→ Volatility amplifies

So the investment logic should be:

H1 2026 = Policy honeymoon + institutional allocation = Bullish

H2 2026 = Political uncertainty = Increased volatility

12/ Now back to the initial question:

Why am I still bullish despite crypto's "worst performance" in 2025?

Because the market is completing a "handover":

- From retail hands → to institutional hands

- From speculative chips → to allocation筹码

- From short-term博弈 → to long-term holding

This process必然 accompanies price adjustments and volatility.

13/ How do institutions view target prices?

VanEck: $180,000

Standard Chartered: $175,000-$250,000

Tom Lee: $150,000

Grayscale: New highs in H1 2026

Not blind optimism, but based on:

- Continued ETF inflows

- Public company treasury DAT accumulation (134 companies globally hold 1.686 million BTC)

- Unprecedented U.S. policy window

- Institutional allocation just starting

14/ Of course, risks still exist:

Macro: Fed policy, strong dollar

Regulation: Market Structure Act可能延迟

Market: LTH may continue selling

Politics: Midterm election results uncertain

But the flip side of risk is opportunity.

When everyone is bearish, it's often the best time to position.

15/ Final investment logic:

Short-term (3-6 months): $87K-$95K range震荡, institutions continue accumulating

Mid-term (H1 2026): Policy + institutional drivers, target $120K-$150K

Long-term (H2 2026): Increased volatility, depends on election results and policy continuity

Core judgment:

This is not a cycle top, but the start of a new cycle.

16/ Why am I confident?

Because history tells us:

- 2013 retail-led, peak $1,100

- 2017 ICO frenzy, peak $20,000

- 2021 DeFi+NFT, peak $69,000

- 2025 institutional entry, currently $87,000

Each cycle, participants are more professional, capital is larger, infrastructure is better.

17/ The "worst performance" of 2025 is essentially:

A transition period from the old world (retail speculation) to the new world (institutional allocation).

Price is the cost of transition, but the direction is set.

When BlackRock, Fidelity, and sovereign funds are accumulating on the left,

Retail is still纠结 "will it fall further?"

This is the认知差.

18/ Final summary:

2025 marks the acceleration of crypto market institutionalization. Although BTC's annual return was negative, ETF investors showed strong "HODL" resilience. 2025表面上 crypto's worst, actually is:

- Largest supply handover

- Strongest institutional allocation意愿

- Clearest policy support

- Broadest infrastructure improvement

Price -5%, but ETF inflows $25 billion

This itself is the biggest signal.

Bullish on H1 2026 📈

19/ As long-term practitioners and investors, our job is not to predict short-term prices but to identify structural trends. Key things to watch in 2026 include: Market Structure Act legislative progress, potential expansion of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, and policy continuity after the midterm elections. Long-term, the improvement of ETF infrastructure and regulatory clarity lay the foundation for the next rally.

When market structure changes fundamentally,

Old valuation logic fails,

New pricing power is rebuilt.

Stay rational, stay patient ⚡️

---

Data sources:

CoinDesk, CryptoSlate, Glassnode, CoinShares, Farside Investors, Strategy official website, CME Group, Yahoo Finance

Not investment advice, DYOR

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument presented by IOSG founder Jocy regarding the 2025 crypto market?

AJocy argues that 2025 marked a historic shift in the Bitcoin market, characterized by a massive transfer of holdings from retail investors to institutions, signaling a fundamental change in market structure and the beginning of a new cycle driven by institutional allocation rather than retail speculation.

QWhat key data supports the claim that institutional ownership of Bitcoin has significantly increased?

AKey data includes: BTC ETF net inflows of $25 billion in 2025, bringing total AUM to $114-120 billion; institutional ownership reaching 24% of the ETF market; and large transactions over $10 million increasing by 59.26%, while small retail transactions under $1 decreased by 66.38%.

QAccording to the article, why did the price of Bitcoin crash despite long-term holders selling a massive amount of BTC?

AThe price did not crash because institutional investors and corporate treasuries fully absorbed the selling pressure from long-term holders, who sold approximately 1.4 million BTC over the period, demonstrating the market's new, stronger absorption capacity.

QWhat is the author's outlook for Bitcoin in the first half of 2026 and what are the driving factors?

AThe author is bullish on Bitcoin for the first half of 2026, citing a 'policy honeymoon period' and continued institutional allocation as key drivers, with a price target range of $120,000 to $150,000.

QHow does the article characterize the change in the market's cyclical nature with the rise of institutional players?

AThe article states that the old cycle logic (retail frenzy → price surge → crash → restart) has been replaced by a new cycle logic: stable institutional allocation → narrowing volatility → rising price中枢 → structural upward movement, leading to prolonged sideways price action with sustained capital inflows.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Mining Farms Are Becoming AI Factories

Bitcoin mines are transforming into AI factories. This shift is driven by the convergence of three key assets from the previous crypto cycle: infrastructure, talent, and capital. Crypto mining companies like Crusoe, CoreWeave, and Bitdeer are repurposing their core competency—securing power, land, and grid connections in remote locations—to build data centers for AI clients. These firms are signing multi-billion dollar, long-term contracts with companies like Anthropic, AWS, and Microsoft, as AI's demand for reliable, high-capacity compute surpasses the profitability of Bitcoin mining. Simultaneously, crypto entrepreneurs and engineers are applying their skills to new AI ventures. Examples include OpenSea's co-founder launching OpenRouter (an AI model aggregator), and former Coinbase engineers building Fal.ai (a generative media infrastructure platform). Their experience in building scalable, global software networks translates effectively to the AI space. Furthermore, capital accumulated during the crypto boom is now fueling AI. Figures like Jed McCaleb (co-founder of Ripple) funded Voltage Park, a large-scale GPU cloud provider. Notably, some crypto investments, like FTX's early bets on Anthropic and Cursor, have generated astronomical paper returns, demonstrating how high-risk crypto capital flowed into AI before it became mainstream. The transition is not just about repurposing hardware, but about redirecting critical resources—power infrastructure, distributed systems expertise, and venture funding—to the next technological frontier: artificial intelligence.

链捕手11m ago

Bitcoin Mining Farms Are Becoming AI Factories

链捕手11m ago

Morpho Launches Fixed-Rate Product Midnight: Lenders and Borrowers Set Their Own Rates, Ending the Era of Interest Rate Models

Morpho Launches Fixed-Rate Product Midnight: Lenders and Borrowers Set Their Own Rates, Ending the Era of Algorithmic Interest Models On-chain lending has grown to $60 billion but remains minuscule compared to traditional finance's $200 trillion annual credit volume. Morpho identifies the lack of fixed rates and maturity dates as key bottlenecks. Institutions need predictability, not the passive floating rates set by algorithmic models. Midnight allows lenders and borrowers to directly quote rates, set terms, and become price makers, not takers. Fixed-rate lending is now viable due to cheaper, faster blockchains and the entry of institutions demanding control and certainty over returns, costs, and duration. Morpho Blue previously gave users control over risk; Midnight adds control over interest rates. Past attempts at on-chain fixed-rate lending failed primarily because they were built on top of floating-rate pools (creating unpredictability) or lacked sufficient active participants. Midnight avoids these pitfalls as a standalone primitive with fixed rates at its core, built upon Morpho Blue's existing large and active user base. Midnight offers distinct value: institutions gain predictable term structures and full control; fintech companies can offer tailored fixed-rate products; lenders/borrowers achieve predictability and efficiency; and curators can now differentiate by configuring both risk and interest rates. Morpho Midnight is not a replacement for Morpho Blue. The Morpho network will now feature two complementary market structures: floating-rate/open-term (Blue) for flexibility and fixed-rate/fixed-term (Midnight) for predictability. Liquidity can flow between them. The launch will be gradual, prioritizing security. Initially, it will support direct lending on Base network with one trading pair (cbBTC/USDC) and limited maturity dates. Advanced features like auto-rollovers will be introduced later.

marsbit12m ago

Morpho Launches Fixed-Rate Product Midnight: Lenders and Borrowers Set Their Own Rates, Ending the Era of Interest Rate Models

marsbit12m ago

human.tech Launches Clean SDK for Privacy-First Web3 Apps

human.tech has launched the Clean SDK, a toolkit enabling developers to build privacy-first Web3 applications with transparent accountability. Released alongside Aztec's version 5, the SDK provides components for integrating zero-knowledge identity verification, sanctions screening, and private transactions, without developers handling sensitive user data or building compliance infrastructure from scratch. It uses zero-knowledge proofs and programmable verification to allow apps to confirm user legitimacy and sanctions compliance while keeping identities confidential. The first application built on the SDK, Shield, a privacy bridge to Aztec, also launched. It allows users to transfer assets privately while proving a unique human is behind each transfer and that funds have passed sanctions checks, as verified by a May 2026 audit. The SDK offers three core verification techniques: Proof of Innocence (sanctions screening against 23 sources), Proof of Personhood (simpler verification via Human Passport), and Proof of Clean Hands (higher-assurance zero-knowledge government ID checks). This allows apps to authenticate users and transactions without exposing personal data. Designed for Aztec builders, the SDK lets developers add programmable privacy to decentralized apps, eliminating the need to create their own verification and ZK infrastructure. Shield demonstrates its practical use for private bridges, but the SDK aims to enable a wider ecosystem of private, accountable financial apps and services. The launch addresses growing demand for infrastructure that balances privacy and accountability. The SDK avoids traditional identity databases, storing encrypted data off-chain, screening at both entry and exit points, and including a gated disclosure mechanism for legal requests. human.tech's products, including the Clean SDK, focus on using zero-knowledge technology to enable verifiable personhood and privacy in digital systems.

TheNewsCrypto48m ago

human.tech Launches Clean SDK for Privacy-First Web3 Apps

TheNewsCrypto48m ago

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

Pump.fun, a popular meme coin launchpad, has introduced a new standard mechanism called BOOST. It aims to address a significant capital efficiency issue: when a newly launched token graduates from its initial bonding curve to a liquidity pool (LP), roughly 20% of its liquidity becomes permanently locked as "dead liquidity," estimated to waste over $100 million annually. Instead of locking these funds permanently, BOOST repurposes them. Upon a token's migration, approximately 20% of the settlement funds (e.g., 17.6 SOL or ~$2516 USDC) are used to buy back the token on the open market over a 5-minute period via a Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) mechanism. All purchased tokens are immediately burned. This creates a brief, systematic buy pressure immediately after migration, potentially generating a short-term price surge ("pump") while permanently reducing the token's circulating supply. The goal is to enhance the immediate post-launch trading experience, potentially increasing trader retention and sustainable protocol revenue, which funds ongoing token buybacks. However, concerns exist that this artificial 5-minute boost could lower the barrier for launching low-quality tokens and lead to steeper price crashes once the buy pressure stops, if followed by large sell-offs. The feature automatically applies to tokens migrating after July 21, 2024, but not to previously migrated tokens or those launched via the Mayhem AI Agent lab.

marsbit56m ago

Unlocking $100 Million in Liquidity? Pump.fun's New Policy Tests the 5-Minute Pump Technique

marsbit56m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

973 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片