Interview with Sharplink: After Holding Over $2 Billion in ETH, Where Can the DAT Model Go Next?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-08Last updated on 2026-05-08

Abstract

SharpLink, led by Joseph Chalom, stands out as one of only two major entities on the Ethereum network among over 200 U.S. public companies that have established a digital asset treasury.

More than 200 publicly listed US companies have established some form of a digital asset treasury, but very few have truly achieved scale. On the Ethereum track, that number might be just two. Joseph Chalom's Sharplink is one of them.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core topic of the article 'Interview with Sharplink: After Holding Over $2 Billion in ETH, Where Does the DAT Model Go Next?'

AThe article discusses the state of digital asset treasury (DAT) adoption among US public companies, with a focus on Sharplink, one of the few major players on Ethereum holding over $2 billion worth of ETH, and explores the future direction of the DAT model.

QWho is the leader of Sharplink mentioned in the article?

AThe leader of Sharplink mentioned in the article is Joseph Chalom.

QAccording to the article, how many US public companies have established some form of digital asset treasury?

AAccording to the article, over 200 US public companies have established some form of digital asset treasury.

QHow many companies are cited as having achieved significant scale in digital asset treasuries on the Ethereum blockchain?

AThe article states that on the Ethereum blockchain, the number of companies that have achieved significant scale in their digital asset treasuries is possibly only two, with Sharplink being one of them.

QWhat is the approximate value of Ethereum (ETH) held by Sharplink's treasury according to the article?

AAccording to the article's title, Sharplink's treasury holds over $2 billion worth of Ethereum (ETH).

Related Reads

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit21m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit21m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit52m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片