Inside Neo Blockchain Fallout: Co-Founders Trade Barbs Over Money and Power

ccn.comPublished on 2025-12-31Last updated on 2025-12-31

Abstract

Neo blockchain co-founders Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang are engaged in a public dispute over financial transparency and governance. Zhang accuses Hongfei of withholding financial reports for years and demands full disclosure of the Neo Foundation's assets and expenditures. He also states that Hongfei will step back from Neo mainnet operations starting January 1, 2026, to focus on side projects. Hongfei counters that Zhang controls the majority of NEO and GAS tokens and has refused to transfer them to multi-signature wallets despite previous agreements. Both claim to act in Neo’s best interests, but the conflict has raised concerns about governance and trust within the community. The disagreement underscores ongoing tensions in the project's management since its rebrand from Antshares in 2017.

Key Takeaways

  • Neo co-founders Erik Zhang and Da Hongfei are publicly fighting over the project’s finances and control.
  • Zhang says Hongfei has kept the finances secret for years and must now share a full report.
  • The argument undermines trust in Neo, with both parties claiming to protect the project.

The Neo blockchain, often referred to as the “Chinese Ethereum” due to its smart contract capabilities and focus on digital assets, has been rocked by a public feud between its co-founders, Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang.

This dispute centers on financial transparency, control over the project’s treasury, and allegations of governance hijacking.

Earn Crypto with These Top Mining Apps
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Mining Rig Rentals"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Mining Rig Rentals

promotions
Earn a commission on your referral\u2019s transactions."}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn a commission on your referral’s transactions.
Coins
6
  • Bitcoin
  • Litecoin
  • Ethereum Classic
  • Monero
  • Dogecoin
  • Ravencoin
  • Zcash
  • Bitcoin Cash
  • Dash
  • Kaspa
  • Firo
No result
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Hashing24"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Hashing24

promotions
Earn 3-10% on referral purchases"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn 3-10% on referral purchases
Coins
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Binance Pool"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Binance Pool

promotions
Sign up, verify, deposit 100 USDT, get 100 USDT bonus"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Sign up, verify, deposit 100 USDT, get 100 USDT bonus
Coins
5
  • Bitcoin
  • Bitcoin Cash
  • Litecoin
  • Ethereum Classic
  • Zcash
  • Ravencoin
  • Dash
  • Nervos Network
  • Kaspa
  • Conflux Network
No result
Claim Offer

Chinese Ethereum Killer Controversy

As of Dec. 31, the co-founders had exchanged pointed allegations on X, with each believing the other was to blame for opacity and potential resource waste.

Neo co-founder Erik Zhang accused Da Hongfei of failing to disclose Neo Foundation finances and urged a complete, verifiable report.

He said Hongfei will step back from Neo mainnet work, effective Jan. 1, 2026, to focus on NeoX and SpoonOS.

Hongfei replied that Zhang controls most NEO funds and consensus power, stating that one person should not run the project. He had long pushed for moving NEO/GAS to NF multisig wallets, but Zhang had repeatedly delayed the transfer.

“Before today, I avoided raising this publicly to protect community confidence and to give space for an orderly resolution. That silence was born of the hope that he would honor his promise. That restraint has now been misinterpreted. I should have done this earlier.”

This has sparked concerns about Neo’s future stability, particularly considering its history of pivots from Antshares to Neo, as well as migrations such as N3.

The controversy between the two founders of the popular blockchain network highlights deeper issues in decentralized project management, where personal control over funds can undermine community trust.

Neo’s History

The latest spat between the two co-founders stems from a protracted historical conflict of oversight.

Zhang alleged that Hongfei approached him privately, before 2025, claiming that joint oversight was inefficient and suggesting that one of the founders step down.

The co-founder allegedly agreed to withdraw, believing it would benefit Neo.

Zhang realized that Hongfei was working on AEON, a new blockchain project with its own coin that might potentially utilize Neo’s resources.

This motivated Zhang to return and question what he regarded as a conflict of interest.

According to Zhang, a phone call agreement was reached, where Hongfei would disclose financial reports and shift focus to side projects, such as NeoX, a cross-chain bridge, and SpoonOS, an operating system layer for Neo.

Erik posts publicly on Dec. 31, accusing Da of failing to honor the agreement. He demands the immediate disclosure of NF assets and expenditures, stating that Da will no longer handle Neo mainnet matters as of Jan. 1, 2026.

Da responds, countering that Erik controls the “super majority” of NEO/GAS in personal custody, refusing to transfer to multisig wallets despite promises. Da pledges a full 2025 financial report in Q1 2026 and vows to pursue treasury transfer through “all available remedies.

Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang established Antshares in 2014, which was later rebranded to Neo in 2017 amid China’s blockchain boom. Da Hongfei, who is sometimes referred to as the public face, has prioritized company development, collaborations, and ecosystem expansion.

The current spat revolves around the NF’s treasury—estimated to include significant NEO/GAS holdings and allegations that one founder has monopolized access, leading to a “black box” of unaccounted expenditures.

Community sentiment reflects displeasure with both parties for undermining confidence. Users and analysts describe it as a “governance breakdown” and a “trainwreck,” seeking rapid disclosures to restore credibility.

Some note danger signals, such as blocked access to reports, which mimic bigger blockchain governance flaws encountered in projects like Mantra DAO.

Top Picks for Ethereum
  • Best Exchanges for Ethereum Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Ethereum Fast & Easy How To Buy Ethereum With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Ethereum See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main issue causing the public feud between Neo's co-founders, Da Hongfei and Erik Zhang?

AThe main issue is a dispute over financial transparency and control of the Neo Foundation's treasury, with accusations of secret finances and governance hijacking.

QWhat specific action did Erik Zhang demand from Da Hongfei regarding the Neo Foundation's finances?

AErik Zhang demanded that Da Hongfei immediately share a full and verifiable financial report of the Neo Foundation's assets and expenditures.

QAccording to Da Hongfei's counter-argument, what control does Erik Zhang have over the project's assets?

ADa Hongfei stated that Erik Zhang controls a 'super majority' of NEO and GAS tokens in personal custody and has refused to transfer them to multi-signature wallets as promised.

QWhat change in Da Hongfei's role did Erik Zhang announce, effective January 1, 2026?

AErik Zhang announced that Da Hongfei would step back from working on the Neo mainnet to focus on side projects, namely NeoX and SpoonOS.

QHow has the community reacted to the public dispute between the two Neo co-founders?

AThe community has reacted with displeasure, describing the situation as a 'governance breakdown' and a 'trainwreck' that undermines trust, and is calling for rapid disclosures to restore credibility.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit3m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit3m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit19m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit19m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy NEO

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing NEO (NEO) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy NEO (NEO) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your NEO (NEO)After purchasing your NEO (NEO), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade NEO (NEO)Easily trade NEO (NEO) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy NEO

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of NEO (NEO) are presented below.

活动图片