Hyperliquid Outperformed Bitcoin By 71% In The Worst Crypto Quarter Since 2018 — Report Reveals Why

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-08Last updated on 2026-05-08

Abstract

In Q1 2026, the worst crypto quarter since 2018, decentralized exchange Hyperliquid outperformed Bitcoin by 71.5 percentage points, generating $215M in gross revenue. While overall market metrics declined, a key structural shift occurred: volume from its HIP-3 feature for real-world asset (RWA) perpetual derivatives surged 175% within the quarter, reaching $68.5B in March. A pivotal moment came on February 28 when, following geopolitical strikes, Hyperliquid's 24/7 oil perpetuals became the de facto global price discovery venue while traditional commodity exchanges were closed. The quarter also saw the landmark licensing of the S&P 500 for perpetual contracts on the platform. Despite excluding U.S. users, Hyperliquid's HYPE token returned +44.8%, supported by substantial buybacks, while the core team voluntarily left approximately $849M in unclaimed tokens. The report concludes Hyperliquid is transitioning from a DeFi narrative to a broader financial infrastructure story.

Decentralized exchange Hyperliquid delivered $215 million in gross revenue during Q1 2026 — crypto’s worst quarter since the 2018 ICO crash — outperformed Bitcoin by 71.5 percentage points, and on one February night, became the de facto global price discovery venue for crude oil while every legacy commodity exchange was closed.

The findings come from a comprehensive 48-page quarterly report published by the Hyperliquid Research Collective (HRC), a joint initiative of Four Pillars and GLC Research, drawing on on-chain data from ASXN, DeFiLlama, and 0xArchive.

The quarter unfolded as Bitcoin fell 26.7% and total crypto market capitalization shed roughly $900 billion. Hyperliquid’s headline metrics declined with the market — holder revenue dropped 33.6% quarter-over-quarter to $149.90 million and perpetual derivatives volume fell 15.6%. Those numbers, the report argues, are not the story.

HYPE's price trends to the upside on the daily chart. Source: HYPEUSD on Tradingview

The Night Hyperliquid Became The Oil Market

On February 28, following US-Israeli strikes on Iran, traditional commodity exchanges went dark. Hyperliquid’s 24/7 oil perpetual derivatives markets stayed open. The protocol became what the report describes as the de facto price discovery venue for crude oil while legacy infrastructure sat offline — an event that drew coverage from Bloomberg, the Wall Street Journal, and Fortune within a five-day window, according to the report.

That single session, the HRC notes, said more about Hyperliquid’s institutional trajectory than any quarterly metric.

The Number That Matters: HIP-3

Beneath the headline revenue decline, a structural transformation was underway. Native crypto perpetual derivatives volume fell 32.5% as risk appetite contracted. HIP-3 deployer volume — a protocol feature enabling third parties to deploy real-world asset (RWA) perpetual derivatives on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure — moved in the opposite direction entirely, growing from $24.9 billion in January to $68.5 billion in March, a 175% intra-quarter expansion, per ASXN data cited in the report.

By March, HIP-3 represented 33.6% of total daily perpetual derivatives volume and 28.7% of total platform open interest. Daily unique HIP-3 traders tripled within the quarter, reaching 40,768 on the final day. Silver was the single most traded asset at $40.7 billion in Q1 volume, exceeding crude oil by approximately 2.4x.

The quarter’s institutional landmark arrived on March 18, when S&P Dow Jones Indices officially licensed its S&P 500 benchmark to Trade[XYZ] for perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid — the first officially sanctioned equity index perpetual derivatives product on a decentralized exchange. The contract reached $2 billion in volume within its first two weeks, according to the report.

The Supply Side Signal

On the token side, Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund purchased approximately 4.94 million HYPE at an average price of $29.90 during Q1 — 18.8% below the quarter-end price of $36.85 — deploying $147.72 million into buybacks. HYPE itself returned +44.8% for the quarter, per CoinGecko data cited in the report.

The report flags an additional signal that it describes as a character disclosure rather than a financial metric. The protocol’s core team claimed just 1.51 million HYPE against a scheduled entitlement of approximately 29.8 million — a 5.1% claim rate, declining each month throughout the quarter. At average Q1 prices, the team voluntarily left approximately $849 million unclaimed.

Four separate ETF filings for HYPE — from Grayscale, VanEck, 21Shares, and Bitwise — were submitted during the quarter, per the report.

The Worst Crypto Quarter Since 2018

The report does not sidestep the primary constraint: US persons cannot access Hyperliquid’s frontend. Every revenue figure, every volume number, and every user count in the report reflects a protocol generating these results without US market participation. The HRC frames every forward valuation of HYPE as, in part, a thesis on whether that regulatory wall eventually comes down.

The Q1 2026 report marks a critical juncture for Hyperliquid’s positioning within the nascent sector. A decentralized exchange that processed live commodity trades while legacy markets were closed, licensed the S&P 500 for on-chain derivatives, and outperformed Bitcoin by 71 percentage points in the worst crypto quarter in eight years is no longer a DeFi story. It is increasingly a financial infrastructure story — and the institutions are beginning to take notice.

On the above, David Schamis, CEO at Hyperliquid Strategies stated the following:

For a year I’ve been saying Hyperliquid is emerging as the most exciting trading venue, period. Q1 settled the argument. One of the worst crypto quarters since 2018 and the protocol still generated more than $200M in revenue, bought back >5M HYPE, brought the S&P 500 onto a decentralized exchange and became the price of oil when legacy markets were closed for the Iran conflict. This isn’ t a future story anymore — it’s all happening now.

Cover image from Grok, BTCUSD chart on Tradingview

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the Hyperliquid Research Collective report, by what percentage did Hyperliquid's native token HYPE outperform Bitcoin in Q1 2026?

AHyperliquid's native token HYPE outperformed Bitcoin by 71.5 percentage points in Q1 2026. HYPE returned +44.8% for the quarter while Bitcoin fell 26.7%.

QWhat specific event on February 28, 2026, demonstrated Hyperliquid's institutional relevance, as described in the report?

AOn February 28, 2026, following US-Israeli strikes on Iran, traditional commodity exchanges closed. Hyperliquid's 24/7 oil perpetual derivatives markets remained open, becoming the de facto global price discovery venue for crude oil while legacy infrastructure was offline.

QWhat was the key driver (HIP-3 volume) behind Hyperliquid's structural transformation in Q1 2026, and how much did it grow?

AThe key driver was HIP-3 deployer volume, which enables third parties to deploy real-world asset (RWA) perpetual derivatives. It grew from $24.9 billion in January to $68.5 billion in March, a 175% intra-quarter expansion.

QWhat major institutional milestone for decentralized exchanges did Hyperliquid achieve on March 18, 2026?

AOn March 18, 2026, S&P Dow Jones Indices officially licensed its S&P 500 benchmark to Trade[XYZ] for perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid. This was the first officially sanctioned equity index perpetual derivatives product on a decentralized exchange.

QWhat significant constraint does the report highlight regarding Hyperliquid's current operations and revenue generation?

AThe report highlights that US persons cannot access Hyperliquid's frontend. All revenue, volume, and user counts were generated without US market participation, framing forward valuations as partly a thesis on whether this regulatory barrier eventually comes down.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报57m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报57m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

972 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片