Hyperliquid leads Solana and Ethereum in fees – What it means for HYPE

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-19Last updated on 2026-01-19

Abstract

Hyperliquid [HYPE] has recently led all major blockchain networks, including Solana and Ethereum, in both fees and trading volume over a 24-hour period, according to Artemis data. This indicates strong user demand, as fees are only incurred during transactions. Additionally, Hyperliquid network has recorded the highest weekly perpetual DEX trading volume and open interest, suggesting sustained trader engagement. While competitors like Lighter have seen a decline in activity, Hyperliquid’s liquidity and consistent participation have made it a central player in the perps market. The question remains whether this momentum can be sustained and positively impact the price of its native token, HYPE.

Hyperliquid [HYPE] is back! In the past 24 hours, it topped all chains by fees and trading volume. Zoom out, and it’s leading weekly perps readings too!

Can this push be a mainstay and help push native token price?

A standout moment

In the last day, Hyperliquid topped every major network by fees and volume, per Artemis data. The network pulled ahead of established names like Solana [SOL], TRON [TRX], and Ethereum [ETH].

Since fees are paid only when users transact, there’s real demand too.

Hyperliquid is at the top of the perps race

Over the past seven days, Hyperliquid has recorded the highest perpetual DEX trading volume, pulling ahead of its rivals.

The chart shows the network leading both Weekly Volume and Open Interest, which clearly means traders are keeping positions open.

In contrast, Lighter’s [LIGHTER] volumes have dropped while its airdrop distribution plays out, with weekly activity down nearly three times from its peak.

Looks like traders are rotating back toward platforms with liquidity and consistent participation. That’s perhaps why Hyperliquid is back at the center of the perps market.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, which blockchain led in fees and trading volume in the past 24 hours?

AHyperliquid [HYPE] led all chains in fees and trading volume in the past 24 hours.

QWhat does the article suggest is the reason for Hyperliquid's high fee generation?

AThe high fees indicate real demand, as fees are only paid when users transact on the network.

QHow does Hyperliquid's weekly perpetual DEX trading volume compare to its rivals?

AOver the past seven days, Hyperliquid has recorded the highest perpetual DEX trading volume, pulling ahead of its rivals.

QWhat two key metrics does the article mention that Hyperliquid is leading in for the weekly perps readings?

AThe article states that Hyperliquid is leading in both Weekly Volume and Open Interest for perpetual trading.

QWhy does the article suggest traders are rotating back to platforms like Hyperliquid?

ATraders are rotating back towards platforms with liquidity and consistent participation, which Hyperliquid offers.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit18m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit18m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit33m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit33m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片