Hoskinson Claims Cardano Can Surpass Bitcoin By Solving Crypto’s Trust Problem

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-09Last updated on 2026-06-09

Abstract

In a June 8 livestream, Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson presented an ambitious long-term vision for the network, framing its mission as solving the global "trust problem" rather than merely competing for crypto market share. He argued that the cryptocurrency industry's core purpose is to reduce the massive annual costs associated with trusted third parties in finance and commerce through "verifiable reflexivity"—where transactions carry their own proof of correctness. Hoskinson outlined four key requirements for this goal: a decentralized engine (via Ouroboros), the right accounting model (extended UTXO), modular expansion (exemplified by partner chains like Midnight), and robust decentralized governance. He emphasized that Cardano's design aims to avoid dependency on intermediaries for reconciliation and scale for specialized applications through technologies like Hydra. While governance structures are still developing, Hoskinson claimed that if Cardano succeeds in building this trust infrastructure, ADA could become the "currency of global trust" and has the potential to eventually surpass Bitcoin. He stressed that for Cardano to reach its next level, it must prove it is a self-healing system capable of surviving even a loss of confidence in its founder.

Charles Hoskinson says Cardano is not merely competing for crypto market share, but for a much larger role: becoming the infrastructure layer for global trust. In a June 8 livestream titled “Why Cardano is the only Ecosystem that can run the world,” the Cardano founder argued that ADA’s long-term value depends on whether the network can reduce the world’s reliance on trusted third parties and eventually surpass Bitcoin.

Hoskinson framed the current market environment as more than a downturn in sentiment. “Right now the markets are not reflecting a bear market. They’re reflecting an existential crisis,” he said, arguing that investors are asking whether cryptocurrencies “even matter” as attention shifts toward AI, synthetic biology and other high-growth technologies.

Cardano’s Endgame Is Bigger Than Token Price

His answer was that crypto’s core function has been misunderstood. In Hoskinson’s view, the industry’s purpose is not simply to create currencies or blockchains, but to reduce the cost of trust in global commerce. He estimated that the current trust apparatus in regulated financial markets, including auditing, insurance, compliance, custody, reconciliation and other intermediating functions represents hundreds of billions of dollars in annual costs.

“The solution is actually something called verifiable reflexivity,” Hoskinson said. “It’s a property. Basically, something carries its own proof of being correct.”

That concept became the central thread of the livestream. Hoskinson used voting as a simplified example: rather than relying on a trusted third party to determine whether a ballot is valid, the ballot itself would carry proof that it is legitimate. Applied more broadly, he said, the same principle could extend across finance, identity, governance, proof of reserves, solvency, settlement and social coordination.

For Hoskinson, blockchains are the storage layer for these “verifiable reflexive transactions,” while smart contracts, zero-knowledge proofs and recursion provide the machinery to make them useful. Cryptocurrencies, in this framing, are not the end product. They are the economic resource that pays for the decentralized infrastructure required to maintain the system.

Hoskinson argued that this is where Cardano separates itself from rival networks. He identified four requirements: an engine of decentralization, the right accounting model, modular expansion of major functionality, and decentralized governance capable of specialization.

On decentralization, Hoskinson pointed to Ouroboros, describing it as the protocol architecture that allows ADA to scale while becoming more decentralized rather than less. He contrasted that with systems moving toward permissioned or compliance-gated models, which he said reintroduce trusted third parties into the settlement layer.

He also highlighted Cardano’s extended UTXO model, saying it preserves local determinism while enabling programmability. That matters, in his argument, because if Alice, Bob and the network do not share the same view of a transaction, they must rely on another actor to reconcile the difference. Cardano’s design, he said, is meant to avoid that dependency.

Hoskinson then turned to Hydra and “channel isomorphism,” which he described as allowing activity to happen in specialized domains and return to Cardano “as if you did it on Cardano.” He said this gives the network a path to scale for application-specific environments, including regulated real-world assets and other specialized commercial systems.

The third piece is modularity through partner chains. Hoskinson cited Midnight as the first example, arguing that Cardano can add functionality without making the base layer excessively complex or fragile. “When you’re modular, if that module fails, it doesn’t kill Cardano, which builds trust in the underlying system,” he said.

The most unfinished part, by his own description, is governance. Hoskinson said Cardano still needs stronger “executive function” and specialization, including budget, strategy and execution functions that can identify KPIs and allocate resources. He cited possible ecosystem metrics such as user-paid fees, active developers, retained revenue, stablecoin supply, active users, stake ratio, TVL, decentralization and adjusted transfer value.

Hoskinson placed that governance challenge inside a broader argument about Cardano’s ability to self-heal. He said Cardano must survive crises, including loss of confidence in its founder, to prove that it is more than a founder-led project. “You have to lose confidence in your founder for Cardano to get to the next level because if it survives that, it means it’s a self-healing system,” he said.

The livestream also included a direct long-term market claim. If Cardano succeeds in building a system for verifiable trust, Hoskinson argued, the cryptocurrency that fuels it could become “the currency of global trust.” He added that there is “an inevitability” that Cardano can win and “surpass Bitcoin” if the ecosystem continues building toward that objective.

At press time, ADA traded at $0.16.

ADA hovers above key support, 1-month chart | Source: ADAUSDT on TradingView.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core function of the cryptocurrency industry according to Charles Hoskinson?

AAccording to Charles Hoskinson, the core function of the cryptocurrency industry is not simply to create currencies or blockchains, but to reduce the cost of trust in global commerce.

QWhat concept did Charles Hoskinson identify as the solution to reducing the cost of trust, and what is a simplified example he used?

AHe identified 'verifiable reflexivity' as the solution, where something carries its own proof of being correct. A simplified example he used was voting, where a ballot itself would carry proof of its legitimacy instead of relying on a trusted third party.

QAccording to Hoskinson, what four requirements must a network meet to build a system for verifiable trust, and which part does he describe as the most unfinished for Cardano?

AThe four requirements are: 1) an engine of decentralization, 2) the right accounting model, 3) modular expansion of major functionality, and 4) decentralized governance capable of specialization. He described governance as the most unfinished part for Cardano.

QWhat specific technical features of Cardano did Hoskinson highlight to support its goal of reducing dependency on trusted third parties?

AHe highlighted several features: the Ouroboros protocol for scalable decentralization, the extended UTXO model to preserve local determinism, Hydra and 'channel isomorphism' for application-specific scaling, and modularity through partner chains like Midnight.

QWhat long-term market claim did Charles Hoskinson make regarding Cardano's success in building a system for verifiable trust?

AHe claimed that if Cardano succeeds in building a system for verifiable trust, the cryptocurrency (ADA) that fuels it could become 'the currency of global trust' and has 'an inevitability' to surpass Bitcoin.

Related Reads

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit5m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit5m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手7m ago

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手7m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手24m ago

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手24m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit51m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit51m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

970 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片