Here’s What The Cardano Founder Has To Say About The Widespread Criticism

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-09Last updated on 2026-05-09

Abstract

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson responded to criticisms from Flare founder Hugo Philion, who compared the DeFi growth of the two networks. Philion cited data showing Flare's Total Value Locked (TVL) at $159 million, surpassing Cardano's $132 million, despite Cardano's earlier 2017 launch. He suggested Cardano was copying Flare's strategy and claimed his network would succeed by becoming a unified DeFi layer for various assets. Hoskinson dismissed the remarks as an outdated marketing tactic for attention. He indicated a lack of interest in further debate, while reiterating Cardano's own goal to become a DeFi layer for Bitcoin, potentially allowing major holders to generate yield. ADA's price was noted at approximately $0.27 at the time of writing.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has reacted to Flare founder Hugo Philion’s comments, in which Philion highlighted his network’s growth relative to Cardano. Notably, Flare has achieved this growth as one of the largest DeFi providers in the XRP ecosystem.

Cardano Founder Reacts To Flare Founder’s Comments

In an X post, the Cardano founder remarked that attacking his network to get attention and media coverage is an old marketing tactic. He urged the Flare founder to update his marketing strategy and possibly try “TikTok reaction videos.” Hoskinson was reacting to an X post, in which Philion highlighted his network’s growth while criticizing Cardano.

The Flare founder cited DeFiLlama data showing that the Cardano network has $132 million in total value locked in DeFi, while Flare has $159 million. Philion noted that the network launched in 2017, while Flare launched six years later. He added that ever since they launched, Cardano has been trying and “miserably failing” to copy their strategy.

Philion further mentioned that the network has far lower statistics across the board in DeFi than Flare does, despite having a massive head start and a vast treasury at one point. With his network ahead now, the Flare founder declared that ADA will not win BTC. Instead, he believes that his network will win by creating a unified DeFi layer for FXRP, FBTC, FXLM, RWAs, and stables.

The Flare network has notably gained ground in the XRP ecosystem, with Philion recently describing his network as the largest DeFi provider. CoinGecko data shows that FXRP currently has a market cap of just over $220 million, with 155 million tokens in circulation.

Not An Attack On The Network

In another X post, the Flare founder said that he wasn’t attacking Cardano and was just simply stating numbers from DeFiLlama. However, he questioned how nothing has materially changed for ADA despite the attacks against the network in 2022. He teased the founder by asking if he would like an advance copy of Flare’s 2027 strategy, so that he could try to implement it.

However, the Cardano founder indicated that he didn’t have time to go back and forth with the Flare founder. It is worth noting that, like Flare, Cardano aims to be the DeFi layer for Bitcoin. Hoskinson had previously said they wanted to make BTC programmable in ADA’s smart contracts. That way, market participants will be able to earn BTC yield on the network.

The founder highlighted how this could be huge for his network, given that the U.S. government and top organizations currently hold BTC. By becoming the DeFi layer for Bitcoin, Cardano could enable companies such as BlackRock to deploy their holdings to generate yields.

At the time of writing, the ADA price is trading at around $0.27, up over 5% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

ADA trading at $0.27 on the 1D chart | Source: ADAUSDT on Tradingview.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was Charles Hoskinson's main criticism of the Flare founder's comments?

ACharles Hoskinson criticized the Flare founder, saying that attacking the Cardano network to gain attention and media coverage is an old marketing tactic. He suggested that the Flare founder should update his marketing strategy.

QAccording to DeFiLlama data cited in the article, what is the Total Value Locked (TVL) for Cardano and Flare?

AAccording to DeFiLlama data cited in the article, the Cardano network has $132 million in total value locked (TVL) in DeFi, while the Flare network has $159 million.

QWhat did the Flare founder, Hugo Philion, claim about Cardano's strategy compared to Flare's?

AHugo Philion claimed that ever since Flare launched, Cardano has been trying and "miserably failing" to copy Flare's strategy.

QHow does Charles Hoskinson envision Cardano's potential role regarding Bitcoin (BTC)?

ACharles Hoskinson envisions Cardano becoming the DeFi layer for Bitcoin, making BTC programmable in ADA's smart contracts. This would allow market participants, including major organizations like BlackRock, to deploy their Bitcoin holdings on the Cardano network to generate yields.

QAccording to the article, what was the price of ADA at the time of writing and its 24-hour performance?

AAt the time of writing, the ADA price was trading at around $0.27, which was up over 5% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报18m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报18m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News36m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News36m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片