Gnosis DAO Faces Massive Treasury Redemption Proposal, "Treasury Raiders" Return

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-08Last updated on 2026-05-08

Abstract

A group of activist investors, often labeled as "treasury raiders," have submitted proposal GIP-150 to Gnosis DAO, calling for a one-time, voluntary, and proportional treasury redemption. The proposal would allow participating GNO holders to claim a share of the over $220 million in DAO reserves. Proponents argue this addresses the persistent and widening discount of GNO's market price relative to the treasury's net asset value. Despite recent DAO funding to Gnosis Ltd., the discount has increased. The current vote, closing May 12th, shows 65% opposition among early votes. The redemption would value each eligible token around $170, a ~30% premium to the current $131 market price. GNO held by Gnosis Ltd. is excluded. DeFi community reactions are mixed. Some commentators acknowledge the "risk-free value" (RFV) arbitrage logic but criticize the proposal as a short-term cash grab lacking legitimacy, as Gnosis never promised treasury backing for the token price. Others oppose it due to Gnosis's contributions to ecosystem infrastructure (Safe, CoW Swap, etc.). Founder Sebastian Bürgel lamented the targeting of respected builders. Aragon's team, previously targeted in similar RFV campaigns, called for better mechanisms to align incentives. This follows a pattern of 2023 RFV-style actions against projects like Rook and Aragon. Recently, Beefy Finance implemented a buyback to preempt such pressure. The proposal's author, Wismerhill, expressed past admiration for Gnosis but now sees...

A group of activist investors (or "treasury raiders") is targeting GNO token holders with a proposal for a treasury redemption plan.

GIP-150 proposes a one-time, voluntary, pro-rata treasury redemption. If passed, participating holders would share proportionally in a portion of Gnosis DAO's treasury reserves, which exceed $220 million.

The proposal comes less than six months after Gnosis DAO voted to remove its former treasury manager, KPK. The proposer, Wismerhill, stated that the market price of GNO has long been trading at a discount to Gnosis DAO's net asset value, and this discount has been widening.

He added that despite the DAO recently allocating $22.5 million to Gnosis Ltd, the discount of the token relative to net assets has only increased further, with GNO capturing minimal value accretion.

Voting on the proposal is now open and will close on May 12. Although support initially led by a significant margin, of the roughly 330,000 votes cast so far, 65% are currently against.

The redemption amount would be calculated pro-rata based on 1.3 million eligible GNO tokens, excluding tokens held by Gnosis Ltd. The proposal justifies this by stating that this entity already receives long-term financial support from the DAO.

Based on this calculation, the redemption value per token would be approximately $170, nearly 30% higher than GNO's current market price of $131.

Reactions from the DeFi Community

DeFi commentator and GNO holder Ignas admitted, "There's some logic to this RFV narrative," but also pointed out that "this is purely an arbitrage play, hardly an ethical one." He has voted against the proposal. (Note: RFV stands for risk-free value.)

Ethereum Foundation DeFi Lead ivangbi holds a similar view. Since Gnosis never marketed its treasury assets as a backstop for the token price, holders have no ethical right to claim a share of the treasury.

Many others, considering Gnosis's contributions to the ecosystem, also disagree with the proposal. Gnosis is the entity behind key infrastructure projects like Safe, CoW Swap, Gnosis Pay, and Gnosis Chain.

Gnosis founder Sebastian Bürgel asked pointedly, when did the ecosystem's most respected builders become targets for hedge fund harvesting? Jito ecosystem lead Nick Almond directly characterized the proposal as a blatant treasury dump-and-run.

Anthony Leutenegger, representing the Aragon team which faced a similar attack in 2023, offered a more nuanced perspective. He called for the industry to improve mechanisms for programmatic token holder rights to better align incentives and resolve such disputes.

Previous RFV Attack Cases

This group launched several similar treasury arbitrage campaigns in 2023, earning them the label "RFV raiders" in the industry, a term the group itself rejects.

Projects targeted that year included Rook, FEI/Tribe, and Aragon. Aragon was ultimately forced to restructure its treasury usage, converting it into an ecosystem grant funding program.

Just recently, when Beefy Finance's token BIFI fell below its treasury net asset value in April, the DAO quickly launched a buyback mechanism precisely to avoid a surprise arbitrage attack by RFV forces.

Regarding the current Gnosis situation, the proposer Wismerhill previously stated that he has always admired Gnosis DAO and predicted that after removing KPK, Gnosis would make more commercially-driven decisions.

This ongoing vote will ultimately test whether GNO holders value short-term commercial arbitrage gains or long-term ecosystem building value more.

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary objective of the GIP-150 proposal for Gnosis DAO, and how does it work?

AThe GIP-150 proposal aims to launch a one-time, voluntary, pro-rata treasury redemption scheme. If passed, participating GNO token holders would receive a proportional share of a portion of the over $220 million in Gnosis DAO's treasury reserves, based on 1.3 million eligible GNO tokens at a calculated value of about $170 per token.

QWhy are the proposal's supporters, like Wismerhill, advocating for this treasury redemption?

ASupporters argue that the GNO token price is trading at a persistent and widening discount to the net asset value (NAV) of the Gnosis DAO treasury. They believe the token captures minimal value from the DAO's assets, and recent funding to Gnosis Ltd has exacerbated this discount, justifying a direct distribution of treasury funds to token holders.

QWhat is the 'RFV' label mentioned in the article, and which other projects have faced similar proposals?

A'RFV' stands for 'risk-free value,' a term used to describe proposals where groups target DAOs to extract treasury value for token holders when tokens trade below NAV. In 2023, similar initiatives targeted projects like Rook, FEI/Tribe, and Aragon. Recently, Beefy Finance implemented a buyback mechanism to preempt such an attack.

QWhat are some of the key counterarguments from the DeFi community against the GIP-150 proposal?

AOpponents argue it is a purely speculative arbitrage trade with no moral justification, as Gnosis never promised to back its token price with treasury assets. Others oppose it due to Gnosis's contributions to the ecosystem (Safe, CoW Swap, etc.), viewing the proposal as a 'treasury dump and run' that harms long-term builders for short-term gain.

QHow does Anthony Leutenegger from Aragon suggest the industry address conflicts like the one at Gnosis DAO?

AAnthony Leutenegger advocates for improving programmatic token holder rights mechanisms. He believes better-designed systems can better align incentives and resolve such disputes, referencing Aragon's own experience where it adapted its treasury into a grants program after a similar challenge.

Related Reads

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit9m ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit9m ago

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit49m ago

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbit49m ago

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit56m ago

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit56m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy DAO

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing DAO Maker (DAO) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy DAO Maker (DAO) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your DAO Maker (DAO)After purchasing your DAO Maker (DAO), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade DAO Maker (DAO)Easily trade DAO Maker (DAO) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.3k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy DAO

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of DAO (DAO) are presented below.

活动图片