From Yen Interest Rate Hikes to Mining Farms Shutting Down: Why Bitcoin Continues to Fall

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

This article analyzes the recent decline in Bitcoin's price, which fell to around $85,600, attributing it to a combination of macro-economic pressures. The primary factor is the Bank of Japan's (BOJ) anticipated interest rate hike, its first since January 2025. Historically, such hikes have triggered 20-30% Bitcoin sell-offs. As the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries, Japan's policy shift could unwind massive yen carry trades, forcing global deleveraging and impacting risk assets like crypto. Uncertainty around the U.S. Federal Reserve's future rate-cutting path post its first cut is another key factor. Upcoming U.S. non-farm payroll and CPI data are critical; weak jobs data might make the Fed cautious, while sticky inflation could prompt faster balance sheet reduction (quantitative tightening), effectively tightening liquidity. Finally, sustained selling pressure is evident from large outflows in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, significant BTC deposits to exchanges like Binance, and miner capitulation. Data shows long-term holders are accelerating disposals, and a reported shutdown of mining operations in Xinjiang, causing a 17% drop in network hash rate, confirms miner distress. These factors collectively create a bearish environment of tightening global liquidity and institutional selling.

The start after the rate cut hasn't been promising.

Bitcoin fell back to around $85,600, Ethereum lost the $3,000 mark; crypto-related stocks also faced pressure, with Strategy and Circle both falling nearly 7% intraday, Coinbase down over 5%, while mining companies CLSK, HUT, and WULF saw declines exceeding 10%.

From expectations of a Bank of Japan rate hike to uncertainties about the Federal Reserve's future rate cut path, and the systematic de-risking by long-term holders, miners, and market makers, the reasons for this decline lean more towards the macro level.

Yen Rate Hike: The Underestimated First 'Domino'

The Japanese rate hike is the biggest factor in this decline, potentially the last major event in the financial industry this year.

Historical data shows that when Japan hikes rates, Bitcoin holders tend to suffer.

After the past three Bank of Japan rate hikes, Bitcoin fell 20%–30% within 4–6 weeks. As analyst Quinten detailed: Bitcoin fell about 27% after the March 2024 Yen rate hike, 30% after the July hike, and another 30% after the January 2025 hike.

This time, it's Japan's first rate hike since January 2025, potentially reaching a 30-year high. Prediction markets currently indicate a 97% probability of a 25 basis point hike, almost certain. The meeting that day might just be a formality, as the market has already reacted with a decline.

Analyst Hanzo stated that the crypto market's neglect of the Bank of Japan's动向 was a major mistake. He pointed out that Japan, as the largest overseas holder of U.S. Treasury bonds (holdings exceeding $1.1 trillion), its central bank policy changes could affect global dollar supply, Treasury yields, and risk assets like Bitcoin.

Several Twitter users focused on macro analysis also noted that the Yen is the second largest player in the foreign exchange market after the U.S. dollar, potentially having a greater impact on capital markets than the Euro. The nearly thirty-year bull market in U.S. stocks has been significantly related to Yen carry trades. For years, investors borrowed low-interest Yen loans to invest in U.S. stocks, bonds, or high-yield assets like cryptocurrencies. When Japanese interest rates rise, these positions can be quickly unwound, leading to forced liquidations and deleveraging across all markets.

Furthermore, the current market backdrop is: most major central banks are cutting rates, while the Bank of Japan is hiking. This contrast will trigger the unwinding of carry trades, meaning such hikes could lead to renewed turmoil in the cryptocurrency market.

More importantly, the Yen hike itself might not be the key risk; the signal sent by the Bank of Japan's policy guidance for 2026 is more critical. The Bank of Japan has already confirmed it will sell approximately $550 billion worth of ETF holdings starting January 2026. If the Bank of Japan hikes rates again or multiple times in 2026, it would mean more hikes and accelerated bond sales, further unwinding Yen carry trades, triggering a sell-off in risk assets and a回流 of Yen, potentially causing sustained冲击 to stocks and cryptocurrencies.

But if we're lucky, if the Bank of Japan pauses further rate hikes after this one in future meetings, the market flash crash might end, followed by a period of反弹行情.

Uncertainty Over Future U.S. Rate Cut Expectations

Of course, any decline is never due to a single factor or variable. During this period of the Bank of Japan hike and Bitcoin's暴跌, the following conditions also coexisted: leverage reaching peak levels; U.S. dollar liquidity tightening; extreme positioning levels; the impact of global liquidity and leverage, etc.

Let's turn our attention back to the United States.

In the first week after the rate cut靴子落地, Bitcoin began to weaken. Because the market's focus has shifted to "how many more times can rates be cut in 2026, and will the pace be forced to slow down?". Two data points to be released this week: the U.S. macro data Non-Farm Payrolls report and CPI data, are core variables in repricing this expectation.

With the U.S. government ending its long shutdown, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) will release October and November employment data this week, with the most watched being the Non-Farm Payrolls report released tonight at 21:30. The current expectation is: +55k new non-farm jobs, significantly lower than the previous +110k.

On the surface, this is a typical data structure "beneficial for rate cuts," but the problem lies precisely in: if employment cools too quickly, will the Fed worry about the economy stalling and choose to adjust policy more cautiously? Once employment data shows a "cliff-like cooling" or structural deterioration, the Fed might choose to wait and see instead of accelerating easing.

Then there's the CPI data. Compared to employment data, the point repeatedly discussed by the market regarding the CPI data released on December 18th is: will CPI give the Fed a reason to "also accelerate QT (quantitative tightening)" to offset the Bank of Japan's tightening?

If inflation data rebounds or shows increased stickiness, even if the Fed maintains its rate cut stance, it might accelerate QT to回收流动性, thus balancing between "nominal easing" and "actual liquidity tightening."

The next truly certain rate cut is earliest at the January 2026 FOMC window, and the time span is still relatively far. Currently, Polymarket predicts a 78% probability of unchanged rates on January 28th, with the probability of a rate cut only 22%. The uncertainty of rate cut expectations is too high.

Additionally, the Bank of England and the European Central Bank will also hold their respective monetary policy meetings this week to discuss their stances. With Japan率先转向, the U.S. hesitating, and Europe and the U.K.观望, global monetary policy is in a highly fragmented stage,难以形成合力.

For Bitcoin, this "non-unified liquidity environment" is often more damaging than clear tightening.

Mining Farms Shutting Down, 'Old Money' Continues Exiting

Another common analytical view is: long-term holders are still持续抛售, and the pace of减持 accelerated this week.

First is the selling by ETF institutions. On that day, Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net outflow of approximately $350 million (about 4,000 BTC), primarily from Fidelity's FBTC and Grayscale's GBTC/ETHE; for Ethereum ETFs, the cumulative net outflow was about $65 million (about 21,000 ETH).

For example, a very interesting point is that Bitcoin's performance during U.S. trading hours was relatively weaker. Data from Bespoke Investment stated: "Since BlackRock's IBIT Bitcoin ETF began trading, holding it after hours yielded 222%, but holding it only during market hours resulted in a 40.5% loss."

Following this, a more direct selling signal appeared on the链上层面.

On December 15th, Bitcoin exchange net inflows reached 3,764 BTC (approx. $340 million), hitting a阶段性高点. Among them, Binance alone had a net inflow of 2,285 BTC,放大 about 8 times compared to the previous period, clearly indicating large holders集中充值, preparing to sell.


Furthermore, changes in market makers' positions also构成重要的背景因素. Taking Wintermute as an example, between late November and early December, it transferred over $1.5 billion in assets to trading platforms. Although between December 10th and 16th, its BTC holdings saw a net increase of 271 BTC, the market was still somewhat panicked about its large transfer behavior.

On the other hand, selling by long-term holders and miners has also attracted significant attention.

On-chain monitoring platform CheckOnChain detected a rotation in Bitcoin's hashrate, a phenomenon often associated with periods of miner pressure and liquidity tightening. On-chain analyst CryptoCondom pointed out: "A friend asked me if miners and OGs are really selling their BTC. The objective answer is yes, check Glassnode's data on miner net position changes and OG long-term BTC holdings."

Glassnode data shows that OGs (coins not moved for over 6 months) selling Bitcoin has been ongoing for months, with a noticeable acceleration from late November to mid-February.

Coupled with the drop in Bitcoin's global hashrate, as of December 15th, according to F2pool data, Bitcoin's global hashrate was temporarily reported at 988.49 EH/s, down 17.25% from the same time last week.

This data also aligns with the current rumors of "Bitcoin mining farms in Xinjiang陆续关机." Kong Jianping, founder and chairman of Nano Labs, also commented on the recent drop in Bitcoin's hashrate, stating that based on an average of 250T per machine, at least 400,000 Bitcoin miners have recently shut down.

In summary, the factors in this round of decline include: the Bank of Japan率先转向紧缩, loosening Yen carry trades; the Federal Reserve, after completing the first rate cut, failing to provide a clear subsequent path, leading the market to actively lower expectations for 2026 liquidity; and on the链上层面, the behavior of long-term holders, miners, and market makers further amplified the price's sensitivity to liquidity changes.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason for the recent decline in Bitcoin's price according to the article?

AThe main reason is the Bank of Japan's interest rate hike, which is expected to trigger the unwinding of yen carry trades and lead to forced liquidations in risk assets like Bitcoin.

QHow have Bitcoin's previous performances been affected by the Bank of Japan's rate hikes?

AHistorical data shows that Bitcoin fell by approximately 20%–30% within 4–6 weeks following the past three Bank of Japan rate hikes in March 2024, July 2024, and January 2025.

QWhat other major factor, besides the Bank of Japan's policy, is contributing to the uncertainty in the crypto market?

AUncertainty around the U.S. Federal Reserve's future interest rate cut path and the potential for it to slow down or pause its easing policy is a major contributing factor.

QWhat on-chain behavior indicates that long-term Bitcoin holders are selling?

AData from Glassnode shows that long-term holders (OGs) who haven't moved their Bitcoin in over 6 months have been selling for months, with a noticeable acceleration in late November.

QWhat evidence from the mining sector suggests additional selling pressure on Bitcoin?

AThere is a reported drop in Bitcoin's global hash rate, with data from F2pool showing a 17.25% decline, and reports of approximately 400,000 Bitcoin mining machines being shut down, particularly in Xinjiang, China.

Related Reads

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit5m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit5m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit42m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit42m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

972 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片