From TPS to BONK, here’s how Solana can catch up in 2026!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

Despite a significant 34.16% price decline in 2025, Solana (SOL) demonstrated dominant on-chain performance, leading all Layer 1s with an average of 1.1k TPS—a 34% year-over-year increase. This fundamental strength is now being highlighted by a 2026 memecoin resurgence, with the sector's market cap up 30% and Solana capturing substantial inflows. Bonk (BONK) and key launchpads, like LetsBonk.fun, are driving this activity, with $228 million in trading volume. This underscores Solana's superior throughput and execution capabilities, positioning it for a potential price recovery as network activity catches up to its strong fundamentals.

As 2026 kicks off, the market is taking stock of 2025.

Despite all the volatility, there were some clear divergences that set the stage for renewed rallies. Solana [SOL] is a perfect example. Last year, SOL showed a big disconnect between its fundamentals and price action.

While it closed 2025 as the “worst-performing asset” with a 34.16% pullback, it still dominated Layer 1s across key on-chain metrics, highlighting strong underlying activity that the market didn’t fully price in.

Take transactions per second (TPS), for instance. SOL averaged 1.1k TPS.

As the chart above shows, Solana led the L1 pack, marking a 34% YoY increase from 2024. Zooming in further, that’s a nearly 160% gap versus Binance Smart Chain [BSC], which came in second at roughly 130 TPS.

Yet, BNB still closed the year up 24%, clearly outperforming SOL on price. This raises the obvious question: Can Solana’s price finally catch up to its fundamentals in 2026? Notably, one key divergence suggests it might.

Solana’s L1 dominance shines amid memecoin resurgence

Memecoins are making a clear comeback this cycle.

Less than a week into 2026, the combined market cap of memecoins has jumped roughly 30%, pointing to renewed risk appetite. Naturally, with Solana hosting top memes, the network is seeing strong capital inflows.

Technically, Bonk [BONK] is leading with a 58% weekly gain, but the real momentum is on the launchpad side. Volumes have hit a three-month high of $228 million, with LetsBonk.fun driving almost 73% of the inflows.

Put simply, Solana is seeing a solid memecoin resurgence.

Why does it matter? Solana makes up about 15% of the total memecoin market cap, and its top two launchpads alone saw $220 million in trading volume. That’s nearly 97% of memecoin activity on the network.

Solana’s TPS is key here. After dominating in speed through 2025, this memecoin rally isn’t a fluke. Instead, it underscores SOL’s L1 strength in throughput and execution, making it a key divergence for the 2026 cycle.


Final Thoughts

  • Despite a 34.16% pullback in 2025, Solana led in TPS, showing strong on-chain fundamentals.
  • With $228 million in launchpad volume and top memes like BONK driving inflows, SOL’s network activity highlights Layer 1 strength.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was Solana's (SOL) performance in terms of price and TPS in 2025?

ASOL closed 2025 as the worst-performing asset with a 34.16% price pullback, but it led all Layer 1s in transactions per second (TPS), averaging 1.1k TPS and marking a 34% year-over-year increase.

QHow did Solana's TPS compare to Binance Smart Chain (BSC) in 2025?

ASolana's TPS had a nearly 160% gap over Binance Smart Chain, which came in second at roughly 130 TPS.

QWhat evidence suggests a memecoin resurgence is happening on Solana in early 2026?

AIn early 2026, the combined market cap of memecoins jumped roughly 30%, and Solana launchpad volumes hit a three-month high of $228 million, with LetsBonk.fun driving almost 73% of the inflows.

QWhich memecoin was leading the weekly gains on Solana, and what was its performance?

ABonk (BONK) was leading with a 58% weekly gain.

QWhat key divergence does the article suggest could help Solana's price catch up to its fundamentals in 2026?

AThe key divergence is Solana's Layer 1 strength in throughput and execution, as evidenced by its dominant TPS and its role as a major hub for memecoin activity, which is seeing strong capital inflows.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit18m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit18m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit34m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片