Franklin Templeton brings ETFs on-chain as Ethereum hosts over $13B in tokenized assets

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-25Last updated on 2026-03-25

Abstract

Franklin Templeton is launching two ETFs that can be traded directly through crypto wallets 24/7, marking a shift in how traditional financial products are accessed. One fund tracks the S&P 500, while the other focuses on short-term U.S. Treasuries. Both will be issued on Ethereum, enabling peer-to-peer trading without relying on traditional brokers or market hours. The move aligns with the growing tokenized real-world asset market on Ethereum, which has reached approximately $13.6 billion in value, with U.S. Treasury products making up the majority at $11.8 billion. The firm is collaborating with Ondo Finance to support the tokenized distribution of the funds.

Franklin Templeton is launching two exchange-traded funds that can be traded directly through crypto wallets around the clock. It marks a shift in how traditional financial products are accessed and settled.

The move brings equity and bond exposure onto blockchain rails, at a time when tokenized assets on Ethereum alone are approaching $13.6 billion.

The asset manager said the funds — one tracking the S&P 500 and another focused on short-term U.S. Treasuries — will be issued on Ethereum and available for trading 24/7.

Investors will be able to buy, sell, and hold shares using self-custody wallets, removing the need for traditional brokerage accounts and standard market hours.

Franklin Templeton is also working with Ondo Finance to support the tokenized distribution of the funds.

According to Bloomberg, the collaboration will allow the ETFs to trade in crypto wallets continuously, bypassing the brokerage infrastructure that has traditionally defined ETF access.

Franklin Templeton launches ETFs that trade directly in crypto wallets

The two ETFs are designed as fully on-chain products, allowing peer-to-peer trading without relying on centralized intermediaries.

While access through traditional brokers will still be supported, the core functionality shifts toward wallet-based ownership and transfer.

Franklin Templeton said the funds will operate under a hybrid structure, allowing shares to be created or redeemed in both fiat currency and stablecoins. This model is intended to bridge conventional financial systems with blockchain-based settlement.

The firm has already expanded its digital asset footprint in recent years. This includes the launch of an on-chain money market fund and is now extending that approach to broader asset classes.

How the funds work without brokers or market hours

Unlike traditional ETFs, which are limited by exchange trading hours and settlement timelines, the new funds are designed to function continuously. Transactions can occur at any time, with ownership recorded directly on-chain.

This setup reduces reliance on intermediaries and shortens settlement cycles, while giving investors direct control over their holdings through self-custody wallets.

The funds will also be compatible with platforms that support on-chain settlement, allowing participation from both crypto-native users and traditional investors.

Tokenized assets on Ethereum near $13.6B as Treasuries dominate growth

Franklin Templeton’s move comes as tokenized real-world assets continue to expand on Ethereum.

Data shows total on-chain RWA market capitalization on the network has reached approximately $13.6 billion. Also, around $9.86 billion is actively circulating across 36 issuers.

Source: DefiLlama

Within that market, tokenized U.S. Treasury products account for roughly $11.8 billion, making them the largest segment.

This aligns closely with Franklin Templeton’s decision to include a Treasury-focused ETF, suggesting the firm is targeting an already established demand base.

Growth has accelerated since 2024, with tokenized funds and credit products driving most of the expansion. The trend points to increasing institutional participation, as asset managers test blockchain-based distribution and settlement models.

The ETFs are expected to launch in the coming weeks, pending regulatory clearance.


Final Summary

  • Franklin Templeton’s ETFs shift trading from broker-led systems to wallet-based, 24/7 access on Ethereum.
  • The launch aligns with a $13.6B tokenized asset market where Treasuries already dominate demand.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Franklin Templeton launching and on which blockchain?

AFranklin Templeton is launching two exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that can be traded directly through crypto wallets, and they are being issued on the Ethereum blockchain.

QHow do these new ETFs differ from traditional ETFs in terms of trading and settlement?

AUnlike traditional ETFs limited by exchange hours and settlement timelines, these new funds can be traded 24/7 with transactions settled directly on-chain, reducing reliance on intermediaries and allowing peer-to-peer trading.

QWhat is the total value of tokenized real-world assets on Ethereum mentioned in the article?

AThe total on-chain real-world asset market capitalization on Ethereum has reached approximately $13.6 billion.

QWhich type of tokenized asset dominates the current on-chain market, and what is its approximate value?

ATokenized U.S. Treasury products dominate the market, accounting for roughly $11.8 billion of the total tokenized assets on Ethereum.

QWho is Franklin Templeton collaborating with to support the tokenized distribution of these funds?

AFranklin Templeton is working with Ondo Finance to support the tokenized distribution of the funds.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit12m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit12m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit12m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit12m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News23m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News23m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit39m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片