EtherFi Founder Criticizes: All Crypto Apps Are Variants of Casinos, We Choose to Be a "Boring" Bank

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-17Last updated on 2026-08-17

Abstract

**Title:** EtherFi Founder Criticizes Crypto "Casino" Apps, Embraces "Boring" Banking Model **Summary:** EtherFi CEO Mike Silagadze argues that mainstream crypto applications like Pump.fun, CEXs, and Polymarket are merely "casino" variants—highly profitable but failing to retain ordinary users. In contrast, EtherFi is pursuing a "boring" and sustainable path by building a self-custody neobank that aims to function as a new brokerage. The platform's summer rollout introduces key features aligned with this vision: expanded fiat on-ramps, an integrated Aave credit line, and tokenized stocks/metals (starting with xStocks). This marks a progression from its initial focus on savings (via liquid restaking vaults) and spending (stablecoins & card) to now include "investing" and "borrowing." A core anti-casino design is embedded in its new Aave-powered lending market. Unlike typical DeFi lending pools which Silagadze calls "woodchippers" for users, EtherFi's system features a conservative threshold that halts further borrowing well before liquidation, aiming to serve as a personal finance tool rather than a high-leverage gambling venue. Silagadze highlights the untapped potential, noting that traditional neobanking is a $300 billion revenue industry—roughly 300 times larger than current DeFi. He believes moving beyond the "casino" phase is crucial for crypto's real economic accumulation. Looking ahead, EtherFi's "Autumn" update plans to add a social, peer-to-peer layer, envision...

Author: William Peaster

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide's Introduction: The crypto casino business is highly profitable but struggles to retain average users. EtherFi has chosen an anti-casino route, integrating stocks, lending, and self-custody into a new banking portal. This might be the sustainable path for crypto finance to go mainstream.

EtherFi Bets Against the Crypto Casino Economy

EtherFi CEO Mike Silagadze believes the crypto industry doesn't have a product problem, but a distraction problem:

"Look at crypto consumer apps like Pump.fun, centralized exchanges, and even Polymarket — they're all Casino 1.0, Casino 2.0, just with different facades. 'Now bet on the weather.' It's very profitable because gambling is an extremely high-margin industry."

Silagadze said this to David Hoffman in a recent podcast episode, while outlining the alternative that EtherFi is championing instead. EtherFi is a self-custody neo-bank that is evolving into a de facto neo-broker.

EtherFi explicitly positions itself as the more boring, more sustainable antithesis, aiming to provide useful financial products that can genuinely attract and retain ordinary people. This vision naturally drives the platform's new feature rollout this summer, including expanded fiat on-ramps, Aave credit lines, and tokenized stocks.

As David noted in the show, EtherFi's roadmap so far has been a series of gradually unlocked "money verbs," aligned with the maturation of Ethereum's own infrastructure. Step one was saving, launching with liquid restaking vaults. Step two was spending, with stablecoins and the EtherFi Card making those restaked assets spendable in daily life.

This summer release adds two verbs at once: investing and borrowing.

Investing means the EtherFi app can now hold tokenized stocks and metals alongside crypto assets, starting with xStocks. According to Silagadze, the plan is to extend permissionlessly to any asset that emerges on Ethereum in the future. "I think this is the first time a crypto neo-bank is letting people trade stocks with the same non-custodial benefits," he said.

Borrowing means EtherFi now has a new Aave V4 market that treats your entire portfolio (crypto assets, stablecoins, stocks, gold, etc.) uniformly. Users can draw a single line of credit against a collateral pool, instead of borrowing separately against each asset. The design of this lending market is where EtherFi's anti-casino ethos is written into code. In Silagadze's view, most DeFi lending markets are built for gamblers:

"It's a wood chipper. You feed users in: they lose money, get liquidated, earn a bit back, and then put more in. That's the casino business model. We can't treat our users like that, or we'll go out of business ourselves."

Therefore, EtherFi deliberately built something more conservative. Here are a few details worth knowing about this new Aave integration:

Typical Aave markets have a single line, crossing which triggers liquidation. EtherFi's market adds an earlier, gentler threshold that merely pauses further borrowing, with liquidation triggered much later. As Silagadze puts it: "We have a conservative threshold that won't kill you even with a 40% price swing, and a much higher threshold for actual liquidation. We don't want people coming here to over-leverage themselves to the max. This should be a personal finance tool."

Furthermore, the current market is a single unified pool on Optimism, with reported plans to add a second spoke for more DeFi-native activities. Deposits are permissionless, open to anyone wanting to earn yield, with external capital effectively funding the loans on the other side.

As for the economic model, according to the public Aave governance proposal, the plan is for EtherFi to retain 80% of the revenue generated by its market, with Aave taking 20% as a fee for the underlying infrastructure service.

Will this new product succeed? Time will tell. But ultimately, the key point is that the crypto casino seems to be leaving ordinary, non-gambler revenue on the table. As Silagadze stated:

Neo-banking, let alone the entire banking industry, is a $300 billion revenue industry today. That's roughly 300 times the size of DeFi. All these gambling shenanigans we're playing with are really just a distraction. The sooner we move past this phase, the sooner the real gains for cryptocurrency begin to accumulate.

Similarly, whether the neo-broker model can replace the "casino" as crypto's biggest growth engine remains an open question. But EtherFi has already spent multiple product cycles polishing in that direction. If any team can pull it off, they currently have the best shot at getting there first.

Meanwhile, we only need to look to the future, and we've already seen a preview. EtherFi's next version was teased in the show as "Autumn." Reportedly, it aims to add a social, peer-to-peer layer to the app. Silagadze described the idea like this:

Imagine sending someone $10, and when they open it, it's a fully functional account without needing a bank account. They can spend it or send it to someone else. The monetary unit itself becomes self-sovereign.

That's a rather interesting idea and the next natural frontier for EtherFi to explore. So for now, let's see if these experiments translate into deeper adoption of the EtherFi tech stack.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to EtherFi's founder Mike Silagadze, what is the fundamental problem of the crypto industry regarding consumer applications?

AMike Silagadze believes the crypto industry does not have a product problem, but a distraction problem. He states that many leading crypto consumer applications, such as Pump.fun, centralized exchanges, and even Polymarket, are essentially variations of casinos ('Casino 1.0, Casino 2.0') with different facades, designed primarily for high-profit gambling activities.

QWhat is the core vision and alternative path that EtherFi is pursuing, as opposed to the 'crypto casino' model?

AEtherFi's core vision is to build a 'boring' and sustainable alternative to the crypto casino model. It aims to be a self-custody neobank evolving into a de facto neobrokerage, providing genuinely useful financial products that can attract and retain ordinary, non-gambling users.

QWhat are the two new key functionalities ('money verbs') introduced in EtherFi's summer release?

AThe two new key functionalities introduced in EtherFi's summer release are 'Invest' and 'Borrow'. 'Invest' allows the app to hold tokenized stocks and metals (starting with xStocks) alongside crypto assets. 'Borrow' integrates a new Aave V4 market where users can get a single credit line against their entire portfolio (crypto, stablecoins, stocks, gold, etc.).

QHow does EtherFi's new Aave-integrated lending market specifically embody its anti-casino philosophy in its design?

AEtherFi's new lending market is designed conservatively to avoid a casino-like 'wood chipper' model. It features two thresholds instead of one: a conservative 'pause threshold' that only halts further borrowing during moderate price drops (~40%), and a much higher threshold for actual liquidation. This structure discourages extreme leverage and is intended as a personal finance tool rather than a high-risk gambling platform.

QWhat future development for EtherFi was previewed as 'Autumn', and what is its intended purpose?

AThe future development previewed as 'Autumn' aims to add a social, peer-to-peer layer to the EtherFi application. The idea is to enable scenarios where sending someone money (e.g., $10) automatically opens a fully functional account for the recipient without needing a bank account. They can then spend it or send it to others, with the currency unit itself enabling self-sovereignty.

Related Reads

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbit10m ago

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

marsbit10m ago

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

On August 19, 2026, the U.S. Treasury unexpectedly announced it would at least double the size of its long-term Treasury buyback operations, starting September 9. The move triggered an immediate market reaction, with the 30-year yield falling 9 basis points. This intervention came against a backdrop of the 30-year yield hitting a 19-year high of 5.34% the previous day, driven by persistent inflation, high oil prices, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health with public debt surpassing $40 trillion, and a global "buyers' strike" for long-dated bonds. Treasury buybacks involve the government repurchasing older, less liquid bonds from the market via reverse auctions to improve market functioning, not to reduce overall debt. While the action provided tactical relief and signaled the Treasury's willingness to intervene, analysts caution it does not address core structural issues: massive fiscal deficits, high borrowing needs, and fading demand from traditional buyers like foreign central banks. For investors, the announcement offered short-term support for long-duration bond ETFs and boosted assets like gold, which rose 2.7%. However, it's unlikely to significantly lower mortgage rates or alter the challenging environment for long-term bonds. The key takeaway is the distinction between a tactical market operation and the unresolved structural pressures that continue to push yields higher, requiring close monitoring of upcoming economic data, Treasury auctions, and potential signals of more aggressive policy measures.

marsbit13m ago

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

marsbit13m ago

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

Following an unscheduled announcement from the U.S. Treasury Department on August 19th, investor discussions have intensified regarding the potential for future policy interventions in long-term bond markets. The Treasury increased the maximum size of its regular buyback operations for 10-to-30 year bonds from $2 billion to $4 billion, citing a desire to improve liquidity. This move came shortly after a surge in long-term yields, with the 30-year Treasury yield briefly touching 5.34%. Market analysts, rather than focusing on the modest operational size, have interpreted the timing—outside the normal quarterly communication window—as a significant signal. The move has been dubbed the "Bessent Put," implying the market's growing expectation that Treasury officials, led by Deputy Secretary Josh Bessent, may act to prevent a disorderly rise in long-term borrowing costs. This perception represents a potential shift in the market's view of the government's "policy reaction function." The underlying pressures on long-term bonds are multifaceted, including large fiscal deficits, increased Treasury supply, a rise in corporate debt issuance for AI infrastructure (creating a "crowding out" effect), and uncertainty around foreign holdings, particularly from Japan. Geopolitical risks in the Middle East further complicate the policy landscape, potentially creating conflicting pressures between fighting inflation and managing financing costs. However, the article clarifies that this Treasury buyback program is distinct from Quantitative Easing (QE). It is a debt management operation, not a Federal Reserve balance sheet expansion. While the announcement opens the door for market speculation about more forceful tools like Yield Curve Control (YCC) or a return to QE, analysts note that conditions would need to deteriorate significantly for such measures to be implemented. For now, the "Bessent Put" reflects a change in market expectations about possible policy boundaries, not an imminent launch of new monetary stimulus.

marsbit14m ago

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

marsbit14m ago

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

"Is Stablecoin Truly Necessary for Cross-Border Payments? While stablecoins are often praised as superior for cross-border transfers—especially if the recipient desires crypto—their advantage is less clear in traditional cross-currency scenarios (e.g., USD to Mexican Peso). The existing correspondent banking system is slow and costly (≈15% fees) due to multiple intermediaries. Modern fintech solutions like Wise have dramatically improved this by using a netting model: they hold local currency pools and settle payments domestically, avoiding actual cross-border fund movement. This offers near-instant transfers with low, transparent fees (averaging ~0.52%). The 'stablecoin sandwich' model (convert fiat to stablecoin, transfer on-chain, convert to local fiat) offers similar user experience but doesn't inherently provide major cost or speed advantages over fintech. Its on-chain transfer is cheap, but fiat conversion spreads remain. Stablecoin's real innovation is 'unbundling' the cross-border payment stack. Instead of requiring a proprietary global network like Wise, businesses only need reliable on- and off-ramps in specific corridors. This lowers market entry barriers, fosters competition among local providers, and can drive down costs, particularly for niche or underserved corridors (e.g., US to Africa). While vertical integration may reoccur, the open, permissionless nature of the underlying blockchain layer makes monopolistic pricing difficult. The long-term benefit is the potential redistribution of value—previously captured as intermediary rents—to consumers through lower costs."

marsbit18m ago

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

marsbit18m ago

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

Ethereum has surged above $2,300, a level not seen in over three months, marking a significant recovery and technical breakthrough by reclaiming key resistance levels, including the weekly EMA50 for the first time in the current bear market. The rally has been fueled by a combination of factors: improved market risk appetite, positive regulatory sentiment, and a major short squeeze where over 88% of recent ETH liquidations were short positions. The ETH/BTC ratio has also broken its long-term downtrend, indicating renewed strength for Ethereum relative to Bitcoin. Fundamentally, Ethereum spot ETFs have shown strong inflows, outperforming their Bitcoin counterparts in recent months. Wall Street institutions like Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan have notably increased their ETH exposure, while several banks have added or expanded positions in ETH ETFs. On-chain fundamentals remain robust, with the proportion of staked ETH reaching a new all-time high of nearly 33.7%. Data indicates long-term holding sentiment, as small wallet holdings increased while large outflows were often directed towards staking or contracts, not selling. However, potential headwinds include declining staking yields and community debate over proposals to adjust staking rewards at high participation levels. The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade, featuring improvements to validator exit efficiency, could enhance liquidity and further attract institutional stakers. While the rebound is supported by sentiment, capital flows, and fundamentals, its sustainability hinges on continued positive developments.

marsbit18m ago

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

marsbit18m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalised services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalisation of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualisation of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasises these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalised Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

409 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.06Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片