Ethereum whales scoop up ETH worth $74M – Any effect on the price?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-23Last updated on 2026-01-23

Abstract

Ethereum's price has declined, hovering around $2,944, down 2.2% daily and 11% weekly. Despite the bearish pressure, whales have been actively accumulating ETH. One whale purchased 20,013 ETH worth $59 million, while another bought 5,099 ETH worth $15.14 million after three months of inactivity. In total, whales acquired 25,112 ETH valued at $74.14 million, indicating strong demand in the $2.9k to $3.1k range. However, this whale activity has not offset the overall market selling pressure. Bearish momentum persists, and if it continues, ETH could drop to $2.5k before a potential rise to $3.4k in early February.

Since Ethereum’s price breached its $3k support level, it has hovered around $2.9k. At the time of writing, the altcoin was valued at $2,944, down 2.2% on the daily charts and 11% on the weekly charts.

Its sustained decline is indicative of intense bearish pressure. However, with ETH showing upside weakness, investors, especially whales, have grabbed the chance to accumulate ETH lately.

Whale continue to ‘buy the dip’

With ETH hovering below $3,000, whales have been on an accumulation spree. According to Onchain Lens, a whale bought 20,013 ETH worth approximately $59 million from FalconX.

Just a week ago, this whale bought 10,000 ETH for $28.9 million and sent $58 million to Wintermute for future purchases. After the latest purchase, the whale now holds 80,115 $ETH worth $236.55M.

Additionally, another whale purchased 5,099 ETH worth $15.14 million from Kraken after being dormant for 3 months. In total, the two whales scooped up 25,112 ETH worth $74.14 million.

Here, it’s worth pointing out that these two whales are not isolated cases either. Looking at the Spot Average Order Size, a hike in whale participation has been evident throughout January so far.

The metric showed large whale orders dominated between the price ranges of $2.9k and $3.1k – Signaling aggressive whale demand.

Often, a hike in whale participation could mean either buying or selling. In this case, the altcoin’s Spot Taker CVD has remained positive throughout this period. A positive CVD implies that buy orders are dominant. Hence, in this particular case, whales have been active on the demand side of the market.

Often, an increase in whale buying activity during a downturn is also indicative of confidence in the market. Especially if they believe another leg up might be inevitable.

Can whales lift ETH’s price?

While whales have aggressively accumulated ETH, their buying pressure has failed to offset market pressure so far.

In fact, a look at the DMI Stochastic Momentum Index (DMI-SMI) revealed that the bearish momentum has accelerated, not stabilized.

To put it simply, markets have settled into a bearish regime, and retail traders have sold at every bounce, making the whales’ attempts insignificant so far.

Such a momentum configuration is a sign of bearish trend continuation or sideways chop, before the market attempts another leg up. Therefore, if whales continue to accumulate while reducing downside pressure, Ethereum will remain stuck between $2.8k and $3.1k.

However, if the bearish momentum accelerates further and overwhelms whale demand, ETH is likely to breach its lower boundary.

Based on the altcoin’s Future Grand Trend, ETH could breach $2.8k and drop to $2.5k, before rising to $3.4k in early February.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethereum whales have been buying the dip, scooping up 25,112 ETH worth $74.14 million.
  • Ethereum [ETH] continues to face intense bearish pressure, making whale activity inadequate for another leg up.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price of Ethereum and how has it performed recently?

AAt the time of writing, Ethereum (ETH) was valued at $2,944, down 2.2% on the daily charts and 11% on the weekly charts.

QHow much ETH did the two whales mentioned in the article accumulate and what was its total value?

AThe two whales scooped up a total of 25,112 ETH, which was worth approximately $74.14 million.

QAccording to the article, what does a positive Spot Taker CVD indicate about whale activity?

AA positive Spot Taker CVD implies that buy orders are dominant, indicating that whales have been active on the demand side of the market.

QDespite the whale accumulation, why has the price of ETH continued to face downward pressure?

AThe bearish momentum has accelerated, and retail traders have been selling at every bounce, making the whales' buying pressure inadequate to offset the overall market selling pressure so far.

QWhat are the two potential price scenarios for Ethereum outlined in the article's forecast?

AOne scenario is that ETH remains stuck between $2.8k and $3.1k if whales continue to accumulate. The other is that if bearish momentum accelerates, ETH could breach $2.8k and drop to $2.5k before potentially rising to $3.4k in early February.

Related Reads

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit1m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit1m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片