Ethereum under pressure: Founder sales, whale losses, and bearish odds collide

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-22Last updated on 2026-02-22

Abstract

Ethereum's price declined below $1,980 due to macro pressure, leverage unwinds, and reduced liquidity. This caused unrealized losses across all whale wallet cohorts, with spot prices falling below the major holder cost basis. Despite the pressure, on-chain data suggests whales are holding rather than selling, indicating strategic absorption and potential accumulation. Founder Vitalik Buterin's recent sales of ETH, including a withdrawal of 3,500 ETH, are seen as a continuation of a staggered disposal pattern rather than panic selling, reflecting cautious portfolio rebalancing in a fragile market.

Ethereum’s decline unfolded progressively as macro pressure, leverage unwinds, and thinning liquidity weighed on price structure.

As downside momentum accelerated, Ethereum [ETH] slipped below the $1,980 threshold on the 21st of February, compressing profitability across major holder groups.

This breakdown did not occur in isolation; it followed sustained distribution, derivatives deleveraging, and reduced risk appetite across large balance sheets.

As prices weakened, unrealized losses spread simultaneously across all whale cohorts, from 1,000–10,000 to 100,000+ ETH wallets.

Spot now trades below the $2,075 mega-holder cost basis, confirming losses even among the largest addresses.

Long-term holders hovers near breakeven, while short-term cohorts remain deeply underwater near 0.5.

Despite this pressure, on-chain positioning shows restrained sell behavior. Realized cap trends indicate whales are largely holding rather than distributing, suggesting strategic absorption.

Historically, such cohort-wide stress reflects conviction testing, where unrealized pain precedes accumulation-led bottom formation rather than structural exit.

Vitalik’s sales re-emerge amid broader whale loss pressure

Liquidity absorption trends continued to develop even as founder-linked wallets returned to distribution flows. This activity did not begin recently.

A fortnight earlier, Vitalik had already conducted smaller ETH sales, forming a staggered disposal pattern rather than a single liquidation event.

The latest withdrawal of 3,500 ETH, worth approximately $6.95 million, from Aave [AAVE] therefore reflects continuation, not sudden capitulation.

This pacing differs from distress selling, where large volumes typically hit exchanges quickly. Instead, collateral withdrawals suggest treasury rebalancing or liquidity repositioning.

These flows also align with rising unrealized losses across whale cohorts. However, on-chain positioning shows limited aggressive distribution.

The activity therefore reflects cautious loss management rather than a panic exit.

While founder sales can influence sentiment, their scale here signals measured portfolio adjustment within a fragile market environment.

Kalshi markets price heavy on ETH weakness

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the main factors contributing to Ethereum's recent price decline?

AEthereum's decline is attributed to macro pressure, leverage unwinds, thinning liquidity, sustained distribution, derivatives deleveraging, and reduced risk appetite across large balance sheets.

QBelow which key price threshold did Ethereum slip on February 21st, and what was the consequence?

AEthereum slipped below the $1,980 threshold on February 21st, which compressed profitability across major holder groups and confirmed losses even among the largest addresses as spot trades fell below the $2,075 mega-holder cost basis.

QHow are Ethereum whales responding to the current market pressure according to on-chain data?

AOn-chain positioning shows restrained sell behavior, with realized cap trends indicating that whales are largely holding rather than distributing, suggesting strategic absorption and loss management rather than panic exits.

QWhat recent activity did Vitalik Buterin engage in, and how does it differ from distress selling?

AVitalik Buterin conducted a withdrawal of 3,500 ETH (worth ~$6.95M) from Aave, continuing a pattern of staggered disposal. This pacing differs from distress selling as it suggests treasury rebalancing or liquidity repositioning rather than large volumes hitting exchanges quickly.

QWhat is the historical significance of the current cohort-wide stress in Ethereum's market?

AHistorically, such cohort-wide stress reflects conviction testing, where unrealized pain precedes accumulation-led bottom formation rather than structural exit, indicating a potential market bottoming process.

Related Reads

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

In Fujian's Jinjiang, a city known for sportswear, lies a quiet semiconductor giant: Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co. (JHICC). Once a promising domestic DRAM manufacturer alongside Yangtze Memory and ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), its journey was derailed in 2018 when the U.S. placed it on an Entity List and filed criminal charges for alleged trade secret theft. This halted production for years. A turning point came in February 2024 when a U.S. federal court found JHICC not guilty. However, it had lost crucial time. While CXMT soared to become a top-valued A-share company in 2024, JHICC, with an estimated valuation of 80 billion RMB, was just restarting. Its current output is primarily customized DDR4 chips, not the advanced DDR5/HBM demanded for AI, but it still benefits from the broader memory chip upcycle. JHICC's story is tied to Chen Zhengkun, a veteran engineer who left Micron to lead the venture. Founded in 2016 with state-backed funding, JHICC partnered with Taiwan's UMC to develop DRAM technology. Rapid progress was cut short by the U.S. actions, which Micron initiated, partly due to its heavy reliance on the Chinese market. Post-sanctions, Chen's team worked to rebuild the production line with reduced reliance on U.S. technology. According to its records, JHICC achieved small-scale production and revenue growth under immense pressure. It now focuses on the stable "niche" DRAM market (e.g., TVs, routers) with a monthly capacity of ~40,000 wafers, aiming for 60,000 by 2026. It holds over 1,000 patents but remains on the Entity List. For Jinjiang, investing in JHICC was a bold industrial leap. The local government provided unwavering financial and logistical support during the crisis, helping the company survive. JHICC has become the anchor for a growing local semiconductor cluster. Though its scale lags behind domestic peers, JHICC's persistence symbolizes a hard-won foothold in a global market long dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Having missed one boom, it seeks a place in the new AI-driven memory supercycle.

marsbit1h ago

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片