Ethereum to $2,400? BlackRock’s latest $41.9M buy may be just the start it needs!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-05Last updated on 2026-03-05

Abstract

Ethereum surged above $2,000 in March 2026, driven by strong institutional interest, including a significant $41.9 million purchase by BlackRock. Despite some ETF outflows, institutional confidence appears long-term. Network activity also reached historic highs, with daily active addresses up 82% and new addresses growing by 64%. Trading at $2,075, Ethereum is testing key resistance. Technical indicators like MACD and RSI suggest bullish momentum, with a potential breakout toward $2,400 if resistance is cleared. Strong institutional support and organic growth position Ethereum for a major upward move.

Ethereum is back above $2,000 for the third time in March 2026, powered by a wave of institutional buying.

BlackRock’s sustained backing, along with other institutional moves, has solidified Ethereum’s position despite ongoing market volatility. Ethereum now faces a major wall – Will it break through or falter once again?

BlackRock buys $41.9M in Ethereum, fueling momentum

On 03 March 2026, BlackRock bought $41.9 million worth of Ethereum, giving the market a solid boost.

Despite $10.8 million in short-term ETF outflows, led by Fidelity with $66.7 million in outflows, Grayscale’s ETHE saw $4.7 million in outflows while its Ethereum fund brought in $18.7 million.

BlackRock’s bold move made one thing clear – It isn’t about quick profits. It is about long-term belief in Ethereum’s future.

This is no small move. Institutions have been driving Ethereum’s price, and BlackRock’s actions have made it clear the big players may be in it for the long haul. Their decision to keep buying through market turbulence speaks volumes about their confidence.

Network activity hits historic highs with 82% growth in active addresses

By 04 March, Ethereum’s network activity had surged, with daily active addresses reaching 837.2k – Up 82%. According to Santiment analysts, 284.8k new Ethereum addresses were created daily too – A 64% uptick.

These figures are illustrative of Ethereum’s organic growth and adoption. The network is thriving, supported by real user growth, ensuring a strong future.

Can Ethereum break $2,150 and reach $2,400?

At the time of writing, Ethereum was trading at $2,075, pushing against its local resistance on the price charts.

The 4-hour timeframe chart revealed strong momentum, with an ascending triangle signaling that a breakout may be near. Clear this resistance, and $2,400 would be possible, setting ETH up for a major rally.

The MACD and RSI flashed signs of strong bullish momentum too. The MACD crossover was solid, and the RSI was gaining strength.

Put simply, Ethereum’s price seemed poised to break through resistance and move towards $2,400. However, if it loses the ascending support, there could be downside risk. However, with aggressive institutional buying continuing, that outcome might be unlikely.

With strong institutional support and record network activity, Ethereum is ready for its next big move. The coming headlines will show if it can break free.

Final Summary

  • Ethereum’s price surge has been driven by institutional buying and impressive network activity.
  • If Ethereum clears the $2,150 resistance, $2,400 will be the next target.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
jst
JUSTJST

Related Reads

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

NVIDIA's Rubin Ultra, the top-tier variant of the newly announced Rubin AI accelerators, has reportedly seen significant specification downgrades, according to an industry report from SemiAnalysis. Initially designed with four compute dies (4-die), the Rubin Ultra is now said to be reduced to a 2-die design. Key changes highlighted in the report include: * **No increase in peak theoretical compute performance**, remaining at 35 PFLOPs like the standard Rubin. * **Severe reduction in memory capacity** to 192GB using 8-Hi HBM stacks, which is less than the standard Rubin's 288GB using 12-Hi stacks. * **Negligible memory bandwidth improvement** of only 1 TB/s. * **Slightly higher chip-level power consumption**. * The **primary upgrade is a massive increase in scale-up interconnect capacity**, supporting connections for up to 576 GPUs via NVLink, compared to 72 for the standard Rubin. The report suggests the redesign is primarily a cost-optimization move driven by the sharp rise in HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) prices. By reducing the expensive HBM content and shifting investment towards enhanced system-scale networking, NVIDIA aims to maintain the platform's value for large-scale AI training clusters while managing soaring material costs. The news reportedly triggered a sell-off in South Korean memory stocks, with SK Hynix and Samsung shares falling around 8%, as markets grew concerned that NVIDIA—a major HBM buyer—might be reducing its reliance on high-capacity memory, potentially capping future pricing power for memory makers.

Odaily星球日报11m ago

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

Odaily星球日报11m ago

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinist1h ago

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinist1h ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit1h ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit1h ago

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbit1h ago

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbit1h ago

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbit1h ago

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions