Ethereum Supply Becomes More Concentrated In Large Wallets, Here Are The Numbers

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-01Last updated on 2026-06-01

Abstract

Recent on-chain data indicates a significant increase in Ethereum concentration among large wallet holders. Whale addresses holding at least 100,000 ETH now control 22.03% of the total supply, the highest level in ten weeks, representing approximately $35 billion in value. This trend points to aggressive accumulation by institutional players and whales, continuing despite recent market volatility and price declines. Supporting this shift, exchange reserves have been consistently declining, suggesting assets are being moved to cold storage for long-term holding. Market activity shows a surge in buy orders from these large holders, effectively absorbing selling pressure from retail investors. Notably, one whale recently opened a highly leveraged $25.6 million long position, signaling strong confidence albeit with substantial risk.

The concentration of Ethereum (ETH) among large wallet holders is increasing as whales and institutional players continue to buy the second-largest cryptocurrency at an aggressive pace. Fresh on-chain data has also revealed a striking shift in the asset’s supply distribution. Currently, almost a quarter of Ethereum’s supply is now controlled by these large players, suggesting that accumulation by whales has continued despite recent price declines and market volatility.

Over 22% Of Ethereum Supply Now Controlled By Whales

On May 28, on-chain analytics platform Santiment posted fresh data on Ethereum’s supply distribution and whale concentration on X. According to the report, whale wallets with at least 100,000 ETH now collectively hold a staggering 17.4 million tokens, indicating a renewed accumulation trend among major investors.

Santiment noted that this represents the highest number of ETH held by this group of whales in the past nine weeks, suggesting that large players and institutions are aggressively increasing their buying activity as prices continue to decline. Notably, the total value of each ETH whale wallet has surged to approximately $35 billion based on recent market prices.

Source: Santiment

Moreover, the share of Ethereum’s supply held by these whales has reached a whopping 22.03%, marking a supply distribution high not seen in as long as 10 weeks. This data highlights a growing dominance of a small group of large holders over Ethereum’s circulating supply, in contrast to the smaller holdings of retail investors.

Interestingly, Ethereum whale activity has been increasing since 2025, with investors taking advantage of lower prices and market swings to bolster their positions. However, sometime in 2026, Ethereum experienced a major distribution phase, as these same whales began selling off their cryptocurrencies. However, recent reports indicate this trend has since changed.

Not only are whales accumulating Ethereum directly, but according to CryptoQuant, exchange reserves have continued to decline into Q2 2026. This consistent outflow has contributed significantly to ETH’s reduced circulating supply, suggesting that whales are buying ETH and moving it to cold wallets for long-term holding.

ETH Buy Orders Surge As Whales Go Long

Currently, buy orders for Ethereum are still rising, as on-chain data shows strong confidence and renewed interest among large holders. Crypto analyst CW shared this latest development on X, noting that there have been virtually no sell orders from whales in recent days. He also said that the buy orders are effectively absorbing the selling volume from retail investors in the ETH market.

Source: Santiment

As this unfolds, whales appear to be going long on Ethereum, betting that it could increase soon. A recent market report by Crypto Rover shows that a large holder opened a staggering $25.6 million ETH long position with 25x leverage. Crypto Rover described this as an “insane gamble,” highlighting both massive confidence and extreme risk involved. The analyst noted that if Ethereum’s price drops by just $20, the whale’s entire position could be wiped out.

ETH bull push for recovery | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what percentage of Ethereum's supply is now controlled by large wallet holders (whales)?

AAccording to the on-chain data from Santiment, large wallet holders (whales) now control 22.03% of Ethereum's supply.

QWhat is the minimum amount of ETH that defines a 'whale wallet' in the data presented by Santiment?

AIn the Santiment data, a 'whale wallet' is defined as a wallet holding at least 100,000 ETH.

QWhat recent trend does the decline in exchange reserves into Q2 2026 suggest about whale behavior?

AThe consistent decline in exchange reserves into Q2 2026 suggests that whales are buying ETH and moving it to cold wallets for long-term holding, rather than keeping it on exchanges for trading.

QWhat did analyst CW note about sell orders from whales in recent days?

AAnalyst CW noted that there have been virtually no sell orders from whales in recent days, with buy orders effectively absorbing the selling volume from retail investors.

QWhat significant risk did Crypto Rover highlight about the large $25.6 million ETH long position with 25x leverage?

ACrypto Rover highlighted that if Ethereum's price drops by just $20, the whale's entire $25.6 million leveraged long position could be wiped out.

Related Reads

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit9m ago

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit9m ago

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

NVIDIA's investment strategy operates through a "three-track architecture," not just its NVentures venture arm. Corporate Development handles massive strategic bets (e.g., $30B in OpenAI, $10B in Anthropic, $20B in Synopsys). NVentures, a small team, focuses on early-stage, financial investments across sectors like quantum computing (Alice & Bob, PsiQuantum), AI infrastructure (OpenRouter, Tensormesh), and biotech. The NVIDIA Inception accelerator provides non-monetary support. This system allows NVIDIA to nurture startups and lock in strategic partners, creating a vast AI ecosystem. This aggressive capital deployment has drawn scrutiny. Critics like Michael Burry and EU regulators question potential "circular financing," where NVIDIA's equity investments in companies (e.g., CoreWeave, OpenAI) facilitate those companies' purchases of NVIDIA hardware, potentially inflating revenue. Supporters view it as a necessary "virtuous cycle" to secure supply and demand in a compute-scarce market. While NVentures' smaller deals appear like traditional VC, its role within the larger, controversial investment framework remains a point of debate.

marsbit37m ago

Which Companies Has NVIDIA's "Three-Track Investment Architecture" Invested In?

marsbit37m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit39m ago

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit39m ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1h ago

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1h ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1h ago

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions