Ethereum Price Dips Below $2,950 After Brief Rebound, Eyes on $3,050 Resistance Zone

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2025-12-30Last updated on 2025-12-30

Abstract

Ethereum's price briefly rebounded above $3,000, reaching near $3,050, but failed to sustain momentum and has since declined. It is currently trading around $2,944, down 3.25% in 24 hours. Despite significant institutional buying from entities like Bitmine Immersion Technologies, ETH faces continued bearish pressure. Technical indicators, including the RSI at 41 and a bearish MACD crossover, suggest weak buying interest. Key support lies near $2,925, with further downside possible to $2,900 or $2,875. Resistance is at $2,975, while a break above $3,000-$3,050 is crucial for a bullish reversal.

Ethereum, the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency, began a small upward move and crossed above $3,000 yesterday after a prolonged downturn, but it couldn’t sustain that momentum and failed near $3,048. Now, ETH is trading below the $2,950 range.

Ethereum Attempts A Rebound, But The Price Dips Again

According to CMC data, yesterday, ETH started to rebound, gradually moving up from $2,928, then crossing $2,990 and even touching above the $3,000 resistance level, and formed the highest range near $3,040-$3,050.

Then, earlier today, ETH dropped around $2,925, but has started to move up slightly. At the time of writing, ETH is trading near $2,944.34, reflecting a 3.25% decline over the last 24 hours. Its market capitalization stands at $355.36 billion. As ETH is currently trading 40.5% below its all-time high zone.

Also, Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) released a press release on Monday, where they had bought around 44,463 ETH last week, and pushed the overall holdings to 4.1 million ETH, as this value is about 3.41% of the whole ETH supply. Although the institutional buying remained strong, ETH has since traded lower today.

What’s Next for ETH?

Technical indicators continue to show bearish momentum, with the Relative Strength Index (RSI) hanging around 41, indicating weak purchasing strength while remaining above oversold levels.

Meanwhile, the MACD displays the blue line below the signal line, which is a bearish crossover, indicating that sellers presently have more influence than buyers. Together, these indicators hint at continued downside pressure for Ethereum, with no strong confirmation of a positive turnaround at the moment.

Ethereum’s immediate support is near $2,925, and a drop below this level could see support at $2,900, then further weakness potentially testing the next support near $2,875. On the upside, $2,975 remains a near-term resistance, while $3,000- $3,050 remains a key breakout level for regaining bullish momentum.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

‌Strategy Keeps BTC Interest Afloat After Bitcoin Price Loses Momentum

TagsETHETHEREUMEthereum (ETH)

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the highest price range reached by Ethereum during its recent rebound?

AThe highest price range reached by Ethereum during its recent rebound was near $3,040-$3,050.

QWhat is the current price and 24-hour change for Ethereum at the time of writing?

AAt the time of writing, Ethereum is trading near $2,944.34, reflecting a 3.25% decline over the last 24 hours.

QWhat does the bearish crossover on the MACD indicator suggest for Ethereum's price?

AThe bearish crossover on the MACD indicator, where the blue line is below the signal line, indicates that sellers currently have more influence than buyers, suggesting continued downside pressure.

QWhat is the key resistance zone that Ethereum needs to break to regain bullish momentum?

AThe key resistance zone for Ethereum to regain bullish momentum is $3,000-$3,050.

QHow much of the total ETH supply does Bitmine Immersion Technologies' holdings represent?

ABitmine Immersion Technologies' holdings of 4.1 million ETH represent about 3.41% of the total ETH supply.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报2m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报2m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News20m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News20m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit48m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit48m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片