Ethereum Near Bottom? Tom Lee Signals Market Turnaround

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-20Last updated on 2026-03-20

Abstract

Ethereum's price is currently around $2,151, down over 50% from its 52-week high. Bitmine chairman Tom Lee believes the worst may be over, suggesting the market is at or near a bottom. He cites analysis comparing Ethereum's recent price action to the S&P 500's behavior during the 1987 crash and 2011 correction, indicating a potential end to the crypto winter. Lee also notes that ETH's current discount to its realized price is similar to the 2025 cycle low before a recovery. While veteran trader Peter Brandt also suggested a potential bottom, some social media users remain skeptical of Lee's prediction.

At press time, the price of Ethereum is hovering around $2,151, being 0.88% down in the past 7 days. Also, it is over 50% down from its 52-week high of around $4,831 hit in August last year.

That is a cruel slip; however, the chairman of Bitmine, Tom Lee, trusts that the worst is over. Not long ago, Lee referred to a “turnaround month” for markets overall, taking back recession fears.

The argument of Tom Lee takes on two analytical frameworks. The first comes from Tom DeMark, a market analyst working with Bitmine.

The analyst has recognised what he says is a 93% link between the latest price action of Ethereum and the S&P 500’s behaviour at the time of two historical episodes, the 1987 crash and the 2011 correction.

Users Not Convinced With the Theory

As per the 1987 correlation, Ethereum should have undersurfaced on March 7. Under the 2011 parallel, the bottom is now. Lee further mentioned that he thinks we are at the bottom or leaving the crypto winter now.

He also highlighted that in the 2025 cycle low, the price of ETH hovered at a 21% discount to the realised price before initiating a recovery. The present discount is almost identical, which he looks at as a meaningful indication.

Lee also highlighted the long-term track record of Ethereum to frame the present moment. In the last decade, ETH has returned around 49,000%, surpassing 11,000% of Bitcoin and around a 6,500% gain from Nvidia in the same duration.

Adding more to this, veteran trader Peter Brandt indicated a potential Ethereum bottom recently also. He suggested at a rally around $4,000 for the second-biggest crypto.

Although, he isn’t convinced by everyone. On social media, some users pushed back on the bottom call of Lee, with various highlighting that this is not the first time he has made it.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Dogecoin Buzz Returns as Elon Musk Revives Dogefather Meme

TagsETHETHEREUMtom lee

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price of Ethereum and how much has it fallen from its 52-week high?

AThe current price of Ethereum is hovering around $2,151, which is over 50% down from its 52-week high of approximately $4,831.

QWho is Tom Lee and what is his prediction for the cryptocurrency market?

ATom Lee is the chairman of Bitmine. He trusts that the worst is over for the market and has signaled a 'turnaround month,' suggesting we are at the bottom or leaving the crypto winter.

QWhat historical market events does Tom DeMark's analysis compare the current Ethereum price action to?

ATom DeMark's analysis compares the latest Ethereum price action to the behavior of the S&P 500 during the 1987 crash and the 2011 correction, noting a 93% correlation.

QWhat significant statistic about Ethereum's long-term performance does Tom Lee highlight?

ATom Lee highlighted that over the last decade, Ethereum has returned around 49,000%, surpassing Bitcoin's 11,000% and Nvidia's 6,500% gains in the same period.

QHow did some social media users react to Tom Lee's 'bottom call' for the market?

ASome social media users pushed back on Lee's bottom call, with various highlighting that this was not the first time he had made such a prediction.

Related Reads

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

South Korean stocks experienced their sharpest decline of the year, with the KOSPI index plunging nearly 9% on Monday, triggering a market circuit breaker. Leading semiconductor firms Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were heavily sold off, raising questions about whether the AI-driven bull market has reached an inflection point. This sell-off was largely triggered by a significant drop in the U.S. semiconductor sector late last week. Concurrently, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul over the weekend, meeting with top executives from SK Group, Samsung, LG, and NAVER. He announced a new multi-year partnership with SK Hynix to co-develop next-generation memory products for AI data centers. Huang emphasized that AI infrastructure build-out remains in its early stages, creating a stark contrast between market panic and ongoing, strengthened industry collaboration. The article argues that South Korea has become one of the most sensitive markets for global AI-related capital flows, functioning like a large AI memory ETF due to the heavy weighting of its chipmakers. The current market turmoil reflects a shift in investor focus: from simply betting on overall AI growth to scrutinizing which companies will actually capture the profits from that growth. This "profit pool reassessment" phase is causing high volatility based on supply chain news and earnings guidance. Ultimately, the direction of the Korean market will be determined by external factors—NVIDIA's orders, HBM supply-demand dynamics, and capital expenditures from cloud service providers—rather than domestic conditions. The disconnect between sharp price corrections and continued strong signals from the industry core leaves the market at a crossroads, awaiting clearer data on the durability of AI infrastructure demand.

marsbit27m ago

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

marsbit27m ago

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

In recent AI market discussions, a new dimension beyond growth and profits has emerged: the question of how the immense wealth potentially generated by AI should be shared with the wider public. Triggered by reports of White House officials discussing "voluntary equity transfers" with top AI firms, similar to models like Alaska's Permanent Fund, the conversation focuses on public wealth funds. OpenAI's own whitepaper proposes such funds, allowing households without direct tech stock ownership to benefit from AI gains. More radical proposals, like Bernie Sanders' call for high public equity stakes and board seats, represent an extreme end of the spectrum. Currently, these are early-stage policy probes, not enacted laws. OpenAI's initiative is seen as an attempt to secure "social license" for its future expansion, mitigating risks of public backlash, stricter regulation, or anti-trust actions as AI's economic impact grows. The core market implication is the introduction of a "policy discount" to AI valuations, particularly for private model companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. Investors must now consider not just future earnings but also what portion might be allocated to public mechanisms. The impact varies greatly based on the mechanism. A small, voluntary transfer of non-voting economic rights (e.g., 5%) acts as a quantifiable long-term cost. Government acquisition of economic rights via warrants tied to support differs from direct equity with governance power. The most disruptive scenario would be forced high-percentage public ownership affecting control and innovation incentives. Key signals to watch include whether other AI companies follow suit, if the White House formalizes proposals, related disclosures in future IPO documents, and any market price reactions. For now, this represents a shift from pricing pure AI growth to pricing its potential distribution. A manageable, voluntary economic share is akin to an insurance cost for societal acceptance, while a forced shift toward control and governance would fundamentally alter valuation logic.

marsbit31m ago

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

marsbit31m ago

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

From Record Highs to Two-Week Lows: Why Did AI Stocks Suddenly Pull Back? U.S. stock indices, led by the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, fell sharply to two-week lows. This marked a reversal from earlier in the week when AI infrastructure and semiconductor stocks had propelled major indices to record highs. Investors are rotating out of these previously high-flying tech sectors into other areas. The sell-off was driven by profit-taking and concerns that the AI rally had become overextended, exacerbated by chipmaker Broadcom's sales outlook falling short of lofty market expectations. The decline accelerated following a stronger-than-expected U.S. May nonfarm payrolls report, which showed 172,000 jobs added versus an estimated 88,000. This data sparked a jump in bond yields, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.553%, as it reinforced market speculation that the Federal Reserve's next move could be a rate hike rather than a cut. Globally, equities also declined, with European and Asian markets falling. Within the U.S. market, chip and AI-related stocks like Super Micro Computer and Arm Holdings led the losses, dropping over 7%. Cryptocurrency-linked stocks and mining shares also fell sharply amid drops in Bitcoin and commodity prices. While the overall Q1 earnings season remained solid, with 83% of S&P 500 companies beating estimates, the weakness was concentrated in tech. Excluding the tech sector, Q1 earnings growth was around 3%, the weakest in two years.

marsbit32m ago

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

marsbit32m ago

JP Morgan Mid-Year Research Report Analysis: The AI Supercycle is Not Over, Reduce Cash Holdings + Allocate to Real Assets

JP Morgan's 2026 Mid-Year Outlook argues the AI supercycle is far from over, despite market pessimism. The report advises clients to reduce cash holdings, increase allocations to real assets as an inflation hedge, and focus on emerging markets. Key conclusions include: 1. **AI Supercycle Intact**: Hyperscalers' 2026 capex forecasts exceed $650B, with AI contributing to GDP growth. However, their financial profile is shifting toward heavy investment, compressing free cash flow. 2. **SaaS Disruption**: Traditional software companies are being negatively impacted by AI, with significant stock declines and pressure in credit markets. 3. **Persistent Inflation**: Core inflation is structurally higher post-pandemic. Holding excess cash and bonds leads to real wealth erosion. Recommendations include commodities, infrastructure, real estate, and gold. 4. **Geopolitical Shocks & Opportunities**: The Hormuz Strait blockade caused a major oil shock, but JP Morgan views the subsequent equity market pullback as a buying opportunity. "Fragmentation" is creating pockets of value, notably in resource-rich Latin America, AI-supply-chain-linked East Asia, and deeply discounted Chinese equities, where a policy shift could trigger a re-rating. 5. **Regional Views**: The firm is cautious on Europe due to high energy costs and lower innovation investment, preferring US and select EM exposures. In short, JP Morgan sees market volatility as an entry point but recommends a portfolio pivot: favor AI infrastructure, real assets, and EM, while avoiding excess cash, vulnerable software firms, and traditional 60/40 stock-bond allocations.

marsbit57m ago

JP Morgan Mid-Year Research Report Analysis: The AI Supercycle is Not Over, Reduce Cash Holdings + Allocate to Real Assets

marsbit57m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片