Ethereum Founder Dumps 100,000 ETH Worth $170M, What’s Going On?

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-09Last updated on 2026-06-09

Abstract

A viral rumor in the crypto space claimed Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin had sold 110,000 ETH (worth ~$170M), sparking fears of a major market downturn. Analysts suggested it could be a bearish signal, comparing it to past sell-offs before crashes. However, the community quickly countered, revealing the transaction was actually by co-founder Joseph Lubin. On-chain analysis showed the ETH was not sold but moved as collateral into a DeFi vault to manage loan liquidation risk, with no tokens entering the open market. Critics called the initial reports exaggerated misinformation and urged verifying data through reliable on-chain tools.

A viral claim is spreading across the crypto space, suggesting that Ethereum’s co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, had dumped a massive amount of ETH in a short period. The report has sparked fears of a major price decline, raising investor concerns. It also drew sharp reactions from ETH community members, as debate ignited over whether the sell-off move indicated deeper market weakness or misinformation.

Ethereum Co-founder Dump Claims Shake The Market

Crypto investors and traders were rattled this week after reports claimed Buterin had sold a large portion of his ETH holdings. Market watchers reacted to a widely circulated post, with images alleging that he had dumped 110,000 ETH, worth $170 million, in just a few hours on June 5.

The report also sparked intense concern, with one analyst arguing that if the creator of Ethereum was moving out of the market, investors should also consider doing the same. Another market participant, @CryptoNobler, compared the alleged 110,000 ETH sell-off to a transaction Buterin made three years ago.

Source: Chart from @CryptoNobler on X

The analyst recalled that the Ethereum co-founder had sold all his crypto right before the market crashed, implying insider knowledge. This suggests that the analyst believes that a similar bearish move could be on the horizon.

Another analyst, Midas, reported that the claimed sell-off was one of the largest insider ETH exits he has ever seen. He noted that a sale of that level by a co-founder was a strong bearish signal for the crypto market.

Other social media posts amplified the story further, claiming that Buterin anticipated a major market drop and was allegedly selling his ETH holdings to avoid losses. These analysts are now warning investors to monitor the situation closely, framing it as an event that could influence investors’ sentiment on Ethereum and the broader crypto ecosystem.

Community Pushes Back And Reveals Truth Behind Transaction

Despite the headlines, many in the crypto community quickly challenged the claims, describing the reports as misleading and widely exaggerated. On-chain analysis revealed that the Ethereum cofounder involved was not Buterin but actually Joseph Lubin. They revealed that Lubin had not sold off $170 million worth of ETH but had moved it into a decentralized finance (DeFi) vault. The transaction was designed to reduce liquidation risk on an existing loan.

Data also show that ETH was transferred through DSProxy contracts and used as collateral in the DeFi position, with roughly 178,000 WETH supplied and $103 million DAI borrowed against it. This is a standard liquidity management strategy in the DeFi space, allowing holders to maintain full exposure to ETH while borrowing stablecoins. Community members also confirmed that no ETH had entered the open market, and Lubin’s position still holds a net value of about $173 million.

After clarifying the situation, community members criticized the individual spreading the false narrative, noting that they were trying to attract attention by creating viral stories. Given the level of misinformation involved, they urged people to always verify transactions with reputable on-chain tools like Arkham Intelligence or Etherscan before amplifying co-founder dump stories.

ETH trading at $1,665 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the viral claim that spread across the crypto space this week?

AThe viral claim was that Ethereum's co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, had sold 110,000 ETH worth $170 million in a few hours on June 5.

QWhy did some analysts view the reported sell-off as a bearish signal for the market?

AAnalysts viewed it as a bearish signal because they recalled Buterin selling his crypto before a previous market crash, implying potential insider knowledge, and considered a co-founder's large sale a sign of deeper market weakness.

QWho was actually involved in the large ETH transaction, and what was its purpose?

AThe transaction involved Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin. He moved ETH into a DeFi vault as collateral to reduce liquidation risk on an existing loan, not to sell it on the open market.

QWhat was the community's reaction to the initial claims about Buterin selling ETH?

AThe community quickly challenged the claims, describing them as misleading and exaggerated. They clarified the truth behind the transaction and criticized those spreading the false narrative.

QWhat tools did community members suggest using to verify such transactions?

ACommunity members urged people to verify transactions with reputable on-chain tools like Arkham Intelligence or Etherscan before amplifying stories about co-founder sell-offs.

Related Reads

A New 'Ghost Story' in Storage: Is the US Going to Grab Money?

The article discusses a potential new phase in US-Korea semiconductor relations, shifting from pressure to build factories in the US to demands for profit-sharing. Citing the *Korea Times*, it reports that a US trade official allegedly claimed the US has a right to share in the massive profits of South Korean chipmakers Samsung and SK Hynix, arguing that purchases by American companies directly drive their earnings. While unconfirmed by US authorities, the claim has caused concern in Korea. The context is Korea's surging semiconductor exports to the US and the dominant profitability of its memory chipmakers in the global AI supply chain. Analysis from CITIC Securities draws historical parallels, noting that sustained high profits or market share by foreign firms in key industries have often triggered US political intervention to redistribute global industrial benefits, as seen with Japanese semiconductors in the 1980s and Taiwanese panels in the 2000s. Currently, the primary US focus remains securing AI-related memory supply and encouraging Korean investment in US manufacturing. Systemic political pressure to curb Korean profits is not yet evident. However, the report warns the risk could materialize if continued price increases start squeezing the profits and competitiveness of American companies. Key signals to watch would be if US tech giants publicly oppose price hikes or if US policymakers reframe the issue around anti-competitive practices. The official's reported remarks are seen as an early sign that the battleground in US-Korea chip rivalry may be extending to the division of profits.

marsbit25m ago

A New 'Ghost Story' in Storage: Is the US Going to Grab Money?

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片