Ethereum fails at $2.5K: How $466M in liquidations crushed ETH

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-06Last updated on 2026-02-06

Abstract

On February 5th, Ethereum (ETH) experienced a significant price drop, falling 14.96% from $2,148 to $1,826. This decline triggered $466.4 million in liquidations, with the majority being long positions. Market sentiment was at "extreme fear," with the Fear and Greed Index hitting a low of 11. ETH's performance against Bitcoin reached a three-year low, and it fell below the key psychological level of $2,000. Technical analysis showed strong bearish momentum, with ETH breaking below the crucial $2,500 demand zone and the $2,100 weekly swing point. The RSI entered oversold territory, and the On-Balance Volume (OBV) indicated heavy selling pressure. Liquidation heatmaps revealed that the recent drop wiped out significant liquidity around $2,000, with potential magnetic zones further south near $1,500. Despite the possibility of a bounce to $2,400 or even $2,700-$2,900, traders are advised to remain cautious. The lack of bullish response at key levels suggests further downside risk, and any short-term recovery may be an opportunity to sell before another bearish move.

On the 5th of February, Ethereum [ETH] witnessed $466.4 million in liquidations, with $382 million of them being long. On the day, ETH prices fell 14.96%, from $2,148 to $1,826.

Crypto market sentiment was in extreme fear. The Fear and Greed index reached 11, a low not seen since 2023. AMBCrypto reported that sub-20 readings on the index represent heightened stress, forced selling, and broad de-risking.

The ETH/BTC was at a 3-year low, representing the severe underperformance of the leading altcoin against the leading crypto. The $2k level was at high risk, noted aMBCrypto, and Ethereum has slid below this key psychological level since then.

Plotting the ETH path so far

On the 1-day chart, the strength of the bears was very evident. In May and June last year, ETH consolidated around $2,500 for a few weeks before catapulting higher in July. In November, the same area was tested as support and saw a bounce.

The subsequent retest over the past week saw no noticeable reaction from ETH bulls. The price bulldozed its way below the $2.5k demand zone and also beyond the weekly swing point at $2.1k.

The RSI was in oversold territory. The 18.68 daily RSI value on the 5th of January was the lowest since August 2024. The OBV also made a new low, reflecting heavy sell volume.

Can THESE zones drag ETH prices higher?

The liquidity to the south has been nearly wiped out, showed the 1-month lookback period liquidation heatmap. Zooming out even further, the 1-year heatmap agreed. A massive pocket of liquidations around the $2k price level was taken out during the recent dip.

The magnetic zones further south were at $1,500 and lower. Meanwhile, the $2,400 and the $2,700-$2,900 areas had some liquidations that the price could target, showed the 1-month heatmap.

Why Traders should sell the bounce

The lack of response at the $2.4k demand zone highlighted bearish dominance. A further drop toward $1.5k remains possible, so swing traders looking to catch any ETH bounce should be wary.

The $2.1k and $2.4k levels were likely to be revisited in the coming weeks. Traders can be prepared for a bearish reaction at these levels.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethereum raced past key demand zones over the past week’s relentless selling pressure.
  • It is possible that ETH would bounce to $2.4k in the coming weeks before its next bearish impulse move.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the total value of liquidations Ethereum witnessed on February 5th, and how much of that were long positions?

AEthereum witnessed $466.4 million in liquidations on February 5th, with $382 million of them being long positions.

QWhat key psychological price level did Ethereum fall below, and what was the low point of the Fear and Greed Index on that day?

AEthereum fell below the key psychological level of $2,000. The Fear and Greed Index reached a low of 11, indicating extreme fear in the market.

QAccording to the 1-day chart, what was the significance of the $2,500 price level for ETH in the past, and how did the price react during its most recent retest?

AIn May and June of the previous year, ETH consolidated around $2,500 before moving higher in July. It was tested as support again in November and saw a bounce. However, during the most recent retest, there was no noticeable reaction from ETH bulls, and the price fell below it.

QWhat are the two 'magnetic zones' to the south that the liquidation heatmap identified as potential price targets for a further drop?

AThe two magnetic zones to the south identified for a potential further drop are $1,500 and lower.

QWhat is the article's trading advice for swing traders regarding any potential bounce in Ethereum's price?

AThe article advises swing traders to be wary and to sell the bounce, as a further drop toward $1.5k remains possible. It suggests that traders can prepare for a bearish reaction if the price revisits the $2.1k or $2.4k levels.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit12m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit12m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit32m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit32m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit40m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片