Ethereum (ETH) Turns South: Is It Sliding Toward a Deeper Correction Phase?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-19Last updated on 2026-01-19

Abstract

Ethereum (ETH) is experiencing a bearish downturn, with its price dropping to around $3,222.34 amid a broader market decline. Trading volume surged by 143%, reaching $28.14 billion, while $156.31 million in ETH was liquidated. A critical support level is identified at $3,085; holding above it may preserve bullish structure and open a path toward $3.4K, while a break below could weaken momentum. Technical indicators signal bearish dominance: the MACD line is below zero, the Bull Bear Power is negative, and the RSI at 41.37 suggests further potential downside. Mild buying pressure exists but is insufficient to counter the current bearish trend.

As the bearish stretch across the market continues, all the major crypto assets are found in the red zone, with signs of exhaustion. The largest asset, Bitcoin (BTC), is hovering at $93K, while the largest altcoin, Ethereum (ETH), has registered a 2.91% slump. In the morning hours, the asset was trading at a high of $3,367.17.

With the potential bears taking control of the ETH market, the price has plummeted to a bottom of $3,181.67. At the time of writing, Ethereum traded at around $3,222.34, and the daily trading volume has rocketed by 143%, settling at $28.14 billion. Also, the market has observed a liquidation of $156.31 million worth of ETH.

Besides, an analyst chart displays $3,085 as a key support level for Ethereum, aligned with an ascending trendline. If it holds above this mark, it keeps the bullish structure intact and increases the chances of a breakout toward the $3.4K zone. A break below this level weakens the momentum and delays any upside move.

Ethereum’s downside trajectory pulls the price back to the $3,118 support. The emergence of the death cross might likely accelerate the loss even further to former lows. Assuming an upside move by ETH, the price might rise to the resistance at the $3.3K zone. Upon breaking this level, a potential recovery could loom, with the force of a golden cross.

Ethereum’s Technical Chart Signals a Bearish Bias

ETH’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line is below the zero line, which indicates that the downtrend is dominant and it trades below its longer-term average. The signal line remains above the zero line, showing the broader trend has not fully turned bearish, hinting at a weakening price trend.

Moreover, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator at 0.02 sits briefly above the zero line, suggesting very mild buying pressure in the Ethereum market. Notably, the capital inflows slightly exceed the outflows, but the momentum is weak and not decisive, reflecting consolidation rather than a strong trend.

Ethereum’s Bull Bear Power (BBP) value, staying at -125.81, signals strong bearish dominance. The sellers are firmly in control, with the price trading below, giving a hint of an intense continuation of the downside unless momentum shifts. Furthermore, the daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) found at 41.37 is resting below the neutral 50 level, implying bearish momentum. As ETH is not oversold, it leaves room for further short-term consolidation.

Top Updated Crypto News

Solana (SOL) Tumbles 6%: Can Bulls Halt the Freefall, or Do Bears Truly Hold the Reins?

TagsAltcoinCryptocurrencyETHETH PriceETHEREUM

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the current trading price of Ethereum (ETH) and how much has it declined?

AAt the time of writing, Ethereum is trading at around $3,222.34, having registered a 2.91% slump.

QWhat is the key support level for Ethereum according to the analyst's chart?

AThe key support level for Ethereum is $3,085, which is aligned with an ascending trendline.

QWhat does the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator suggest about ETH's trend?

AETH's MACD line being below the zero line indicates that the downtrend is dominant and that the price is trading below its longer-term average.

QWhat is the significance of the Bull Bear Power (BBP) value being at -125.81?

AA Bull Bear Power (BBP) value of -125.81 signals strong bearish dominance, indicating that sellers are firmly in control and the price is trading below its average, suggesting a potential continuation of the downside.

QWhat potential event could accelerate Ethereum's losses even further according to the article?

AThe emergence of a death cross could likely accelerate Ethereum's losses even further toward former lows.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit17m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit17m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit32m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片